Abstract
In this chapter, we present our key results. Specifically, our stated hypotheses are explicitly tested here where the efficacy of debriefing-based SDILE is assessed on five dimensions: subjects’ task performance, decision strategy, decision time, structural knowledge, and heuristic knowledge. Both the main effects and indirect effects of debriefing on these five dimensions are reported. Beginning with the descriptive analysis of our participant, we report the subjects’ performance and learning in the dynamic task. Subjects’ reaction to received debriefing as well as the effects of the practice is also reported here.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The benchmark performance is based on a near optimal strategy which is described in detail in Qudrat-Ullah (2014).
References
Abdel-Hamid, T., Sengupta, K., & Swett, C. (1999). The impact of goals on software project management: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 1–19.
Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2014). Yes we can: Improving performance in dynamic tasks. Decision Support Systems, 61, 23–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2020). Results of Experimental Research. In: Improving Human Performance in Dynamic Tasks. SpringerBriefs in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28166-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28166-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28165-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28166-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)