Abstract
The secondary structure was first described by Pauling et al. in 1951 [14] in their findings of helical and sheet hydrogen bounding patterns in a protein backbone. Further refinements have been made since then, such as the description and identification of first 3, then 8 local conformational states [10]. The accuracy of 3-state secondary structure prediction has risen during last 3 decades and now we are approaching to the theoretical limit of 88–90%. These improvements came from increasingly larger databases of protein sequences and structures for training, the use of template secondary structure information and more powerful deep learning techniques. In this paper we review the best four scorer servers which provide the highest accuracy for 3- and 8-state secondary structure prediction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altschul, S., et al.: Gapped blast and PSI-blast: a new generation of protein databases search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–402 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
Anfinsen, C.B.: Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 181(4096), 223–230 (1973)
Bourne, P.E.: The protein data bank. In: Protein Structure: Determination, Analysis, and Applications for Drug Discovery, p. 389 (2003)
Ceroni, A., Frasconi, P.: On the role of long-range dependencies in learning protein secondary structure. In: 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37541), vol. 3, pp. 1899–1904. IEEE (2004)
Ceroni, A., Frasconi, P., Pollastri, G.: Learning protein secondary structure from sequential and relational data. Neural Netw. 18(8), 1029–1039 (2005)
Fang, C., Shang, Y., Xu, D.: MUFOLD-SS: new deep inception-inside-inception networks for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 86(5), 592–598 (2018)
Hanson, J., Paliwal, K., Litfin, T., Yang, Y., Zhou, Y.: Improving prediction of protein secondary structure, backbone angles, solvent accessibility and contact numbers by using predicted contact maps and an ensemble of recurrent and residual convolutional neural networks. Bioinformatics (2018)
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)
Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997)
Kabsch, W., Sander, C.: Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22(12), 2577–2637 (1983)
Klausen, M.S., et al.: NetSurfP-2.0: improved prediction of protein structural features by integrated deep learning. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 87, 520–527 (2019)
Moult, J., Fidelis, K., Kryshtafovych, A., Schwede, T., Tramontano, A.: Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) - round XII. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 86(Suppl. 1) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.25415
Oldfield, C.J., Chen, K., Kurgan, L.: Computational prediction of secondary and supersecondary structures from protein sequences. In: Kister, A. (ed.) Protein Supersecondary Structures, pp. 73–100. Springer, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9161-7_4
Pauling, L., Corey, R.B., Branson, H.R.: The structure of proteins: two hydrogen-bonded helical configurations of the polypeptide chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 37(4), 205–211 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.37.4.205. https://www.pnas.org/content/37/4/205
Pirovano, W., Heringa, J.: Protein secondary structure prediction. In: Carugo, O., Eisenhaber, F. (eds.) Data Mining Techniques for the Life Sciences, pp. 327–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-241-4_19
Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Hauser, A., Söding, J.: HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat. Methods 9(2), 173 (2012)
Rost, B.: Protein secondary structure prediction continues to rise. J. Struct. Biol. 134(2–3), 204–218 (2001)
Rost, B., Sander, C.: Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 90(16), 7558–7562 (1993)
Rost, B., Sander, C., Schneider, R.: Redefining the goal of protein secondary structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 235, 13–26 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80007-5
Schuster, M., Paliwal, K.K.: Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Sig. Process. 45(11), 2673–2681 (1997)
Staples, M., Chan, L., Si, D., Johnson, K., Whyte, C., Cao, R.: Artificial intelligence for bioinformatics: applications in protein folding prediction (2019). https://doi.org/10.1101/561027
Stephenson, N., et al.: Survey of machine learning techniques in drug discovery. Curr. Drug Metab. 19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2174/1389200219666180820112457
Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., Alemi, A.A.: Inception-v4, inception-resnet and the impact of residual connections on learning. In: Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2017)
Tai, C.H., Bai, H., Taylor, T.J., Lee, B.: Assessment of template-free modeling in CASP10 and ROLL. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 82, 57–83 (2014)
Torrisi, M., Kaleel, M., Pollastri, G.: Porter 5: fast, state-of-the-art AB initio prediction of protein secondary structure in 3 and 8 classes. bioRxiv, p. 289033 (2018)
Yang, Y., et al.: Sixty-five years of the long march in protein secondary structure prediction: the final stretch? Brief. Bioinform. 19(3), 482–494 (2016)
Zhang, W., Dunker, A.K., Zhou, Y.: Assessing secondary structure assignment of protein structures by using pairwise sequence-alignment benchmarks. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 71(1), 61–67 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21654. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/prot.21654
Zhou, Y., Duan, Y., Yang, Y., Faraggi, E., Lei, H.: Trends in template/fragment-free protein structure prediction. Theor. Chem. Acc. 128(1), 3–16 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Musci, M., Maruccia, G., Ferretti, M. (2019). A Review of Quasi-perfect Secondary Structure Prediction Servers. In: Anderst-Kotsis, G., et al. Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1062. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27684-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27684-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27683-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27684-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)