Skip to main content

Organic Pork in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Sustainability of European Food Quality Schemes

Abstract

In Germany, the market share of organic meat (pork, beef, poultry, etc.) is less than 1.8% and organic pork meat is even lower. In 2016, the total production volume of organic pork amounted approximately to 250,000 slaughtered pigs, whereas in the conventional sector, nearly 60 million pigs are slaughtered every year. The German self-sufficiency degree in organic pork meat varies over the years and was around 70–75% in 2016. This lack of organic pork meat is covered by imports mainly from Denmark and The Netherlands. Thanks to a growing demand, German producers of organically fattened pigs can rely on stable and high prices compared to conventional fluctuating prices. This is one of the reasons why German production of organic pork is continuously growing since 2015.

Regarding slaughterhouses and processors for organic pork, there are six main players in Germany dealing with three fourth of the total volume plus a series of small to medium-sized companies, slaughtering organic pigs 1 or 2 days per week. Most of the production is commercialized through organized value chains with long term contracts made with specialized organic producers’ organizations. Organic pork is offered to consumers through all kind of distribution channels, including direct selling.

Organic pork outperforms its conventional reference along most of the sustainability indicators assessed in this chapter. The two notable exceptions are exports, as Germany is not self-sufficient in organic pork, and water pollution from nitrates: while organic pork production is less polluting on an area basis, its lower productivity implies a larger discharge of nitrogen per ton of meat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See: Smith-Spangler et al. (2012).

  2. 2.

    There are no statistics on the number of such farmers, there must be at least 250 farmers in Germany, rearing both: piglets and fattening pigs (source: Destatis 2017, p. 43).

  3. 3.

    Farms with less than 50 pig places and which are under the thresholds for the other production branches are not taken into consideration by Destatis.

  4. 4.

    A survey by AMI is ongoing in 2017/2018 on butcheries as well as on direct selling farmers in order to get more solid information on these two channels.

  5. 5.

    A private certification organization is a union of organically producing farmers and manufacturers – with the purpose to support the common marketing and control of the products. The first organization was “Demeter” founded in 1924 and their requirements are higher than those laid down in the EU regulation on organic farming. The most important organic certification organizations in Germany for pork meat are Bioland, Naturland, Demeter, Biokreis, Biopark and Gäa. These certifiers have their own standards (“EU+”) which are checked by the yearly mandatory controls of German control bodies. Approximately 60% of organic pigs in Germany are certified by Naturland. Some of these farmer’s associations have created “market actors” in different value chains and with different organization forms. These stakeholders then buy and sell pork meat. Exampels are the “Vermarktungsgesellschaft Bio-Bauern mbH (Bioland)” or the “Marktgesellschaft der Naturland Bauern AG”.

References

  • AMI. (2017a, June) Preise für Mastschweine E, konv, bio, Grafik Nr. OL-136, Agrarmarkt Informations-Gesellschaft mbH (AMI).

    Google Scholar 

  • AMI. (2017b, January). AMI Markt Charts Importangebot von Bio-Produkten in Deutschland – Bio-Fleisch, Stand 30.1.2017, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellassen, V., Giraud, G., Hilal, M., Arfini, F., Barczak, A., Bodini, A., Brennan, M., Drut, M., Duboys de Labarre, M., Gorton, M., Hartmann, M., Majewski, E., Muller, P., Monier-Dilhan, S., Poméon, T., Tocco, B., Tregear, A., Veneziani, M., Vergote, M.-H., Vitterso, G., Wavresky, P., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Strength2Food project, deliverable 3.2: Methods and indicators for measuring the social, environmental and economic impacts of food quality schemes. INRA, Dijon, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMEL (2017, April). Ökobarometer 2017, Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (BMEL).

    Google Scholar 

  • British Journal of Nutrition. (2016). Composition differences between organic and conventional meat, no. 115, pp. 994–1011. (Based on a study of University of Newcastle, November 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bund für Ökologische Lebensmittelwirtschaft (BÖLW). (2017). Zahlen, Daten, Fakten zur Bio-Branche 2017, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, K. M., Gerber, J. S., Mueller, N. D., Herrero, M., MacDonald, G. K., Brauman, K. A., Havlik, P., O’Connell, C. S., Johnson, J. A., Saatchi, S., & West, P. C. (2016). Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nature Climate Change, 7, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3158

  • Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 766–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.082

  • Destatis. (2017, June). Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Fischerei -Betriebe mit ökologischem Landbau, Agrarstrukturerhebung, Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 3, Reihe 2.2.1; p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Parliament. (2016, December) Human health implications of organic food and organic agriculture; EPRS (European Parliament Research Service – Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA), PE 581.922.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIBL. (2015). 100 Argumente für den Biolandbau (2nd ed.). Frick: Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrle, J. (2017). Expert interview with Jürgen Herrle, consultant/advisor in animal husbandry for Naturland Öko-Beratungs Gesellschaft mbH und Erzeugerring für naturgemäßen Landbau e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISN. (2017, March 23). ISN-Schlachthofranking 2016 – Chinaboom und Rohstoffsicherung. https://www.schweine.net/news/isn-schlachthofranking-2016-chinaboom-rohstoffe.html

  • Just, R. E., & Pope, R. D. (2001). The agricultural producer: Theory and statistical measurement. In B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (Eds.), Handbook of agricultural economics, volume 1, part A (pp. 629–741). North-Holland: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • KÖN. (2017, September). Biomarkt Niedersachsen – Öko-Tiere in Niedersachsen und ihre Bedeutung, Kompetenzzentrum Ökolandbau Niedersachsen GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kool, A., Blonk, H., Ponsioen, T., Sukkel, W., Vermeer, H. M., Vries, J. W. de, Hoste, R. (2009). Carbon footprints of conventional and organic pork. Assessments of typical production systems in the Netherlands, Denmark, England and Germany. Blonk Milieu Advies [etc.], Gouda [etc.].

    Google Scholar 

  • KTBL. (2015). Faustzahlen für den ökologischen Landbau, Kuratorium für Technik und Bauwesen in der Landwirtschaft (KTBL), p. 56), Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • LfL. (2012, May 25). Öko-Daten selbst ermittelt, belastbare Zahlen zur wirtschaftlichen Erzeugung von Öko-Schweinen, in BLW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, M. S., Stoessel, F., Jungbluth, N., Juraske, R., Schader, C., & Stolze, M. (2015). Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products – Are the differences captured by life cycle assessment? Journal of Environmental Management, 149, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.006

  • Münchhausen, S. et al. (2015), Beim Fleisch läuft’s immer etwas anders! - Perspektiven zum Aufbau wertebasierter Wertschöpfungsketten, Tagung der DGS, 6-7.11.2015, Fulda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naturland. (2017, November) Schweinehaltung. https://www.naturland.de/de/erzeuger/betriebszweige/schweinehaltung.html

  • Ökolandbau. (2015, June 25). Erzeuger – Kennzahlen und Leistungsdaten. https://www.oekolandbau.de/erzeuger/tierhaltung/spezielle-tierhaltung/schweine/oekonomie/kennzahlen-und-leistungsdaten

  • Smith-Spangler, C., Brandeu, L. M., Hunter, G. E., Bavinger, J. C., et al. (2012). Are organic foods safer or healthier than conventional alternatives? Annals of Internal Medicine, 157(5), 348–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista. (2017). Umsatz mit Bio-Lebensmitteln in Deutschland in den Jahren 2000 bis 2016, Statistikportal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiftung Warentest (2003, November). Schweine würden Bio kaufen, Stiftung Warentest, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Werf, H. M. G., Kanyarushoki, C., Corson, M. S. (2009). An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 3643–3652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.003

  • Vollmer, T. (2012, December). Bio-Schweine in der Klemme, in: top agrar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wucherpfenning. (2015, June). Die Situation am Bio-Schweinemarkt, Landwirtschaftskammer NRW, Ökolandbauportal (article dated 25/6/2015 by Christian Wucherpfennig).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wucherpfenning. (2017a) Expert interview with Christian Wucherpfennig, ABD and Landwirtschaftskammer Nordrhein-Westfalen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wucherpfenning. (2017b, March). Bio-Schweinefleisch – Nachfrage wächst stetig, Landwirtschaftskammer NRW, Ökolandbauportal www.oekolandbau.nrw.de

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Böhm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Böhm, M., Gauvrit, L., Schaer, B. (2019). Organic Pork in Germany. In: Arfini, F., Bellassen, V. (eds) Sustainability of European Food Quality Schemes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27508-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics