Skip to main content

CAF Operations: A Comprehensive Approach to Enable Future Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Canadian Defence Policy in Theory and Practice

Part of the book series: Canada and International Affairs ((CIAF))

  • 4528 Accesses

Abstract

Despite increasing calls to harness and integrate the entirety of state power in response to defence and security challenges under a Comprehensive Approach, the benefits posed by such integration often go unrealized in Western nations. Simultaneously, hybrid actors, possessing strategic outlooks incompatible with Western security objectives, seem increasingly able to harness multi-spectral elements of national or group power to achieve their desired ends. This chapter examines insights provided by recent Canadian operations, and those of hybrid actors, to understand how Canada can improve its ability to apply Comprehensive Approach principles. Moreover, it draws linkages to Canadian institutional, bureaucratic and cultural features to stimulate thinking about what will be required in future security environments. In doing so, it argues that strong, decisive leadership, robust institutional structures and inter-organizational processes are necessary to facilitate development of holistic approaches in response to contemporary security challenges.

The views presented here are those of the authors alone and do not represent the views or policies of Defence Research and Development Canada, the Department of National Defence or the Government of Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archambault, Peter, and Brad Gladman. 2011. A Role for Effects-Based Planning in a National Security Framework. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 13 (2): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axworthy, Lloyd. 1997. Canada and Human Security: A Need for Leadership. International Journal 52 (2): 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgault, Jacques, and René Lapierre. 2000. Horizontality and Public Management Final Report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Public Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBC News. 2011. NATO Worried over Possible Libya War Crimes Probe. CBCNews. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/nato-worried-over-possible-libya-war-crimes-probe1.1047228.

  • Chuka, Neil. 2007. Confusion and Disagreement: The Information Operations Doctrine of the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and NATO. MA thesis, Department of War Studies, Royal Military College of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuka, Neil, and Jennifer Born. 2014. Hybrid Warfare: Implications for CAF Force Development. DRDC-RDDC-2014-R43. Ottawa: Defence Research and Development Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody, Edward. 2011. French, British Leaders Meet About West’s Role in Libyan Uprising. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/france_britain_call_for_summit_on_natos_role_in_libyan_uprising/2011/04/13/AFy71qVD_story.html?utm_term=.b1fb0a99ae6d&wprss=rss_homepage.

  • Commission of Inquiry into the Investigation of the Bombing of Air India Flight 182. 2010. Air India Flight 182: A Canadian Tragedy—Volume One: The Overview. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, C.E.S. 2004. Putting Accountability and Responsibility Back in the System of Government. Policy Options 25 (9): 64–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, Lawrence. 2014. Ukraine and the Art of Crisis Management. Survival 56 (3): 7–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, Russell. 2009. Thoughts on “Hybrid” Conflict. Small Wars Journal. http://smallwarsjournal.com/blog/journal/docs-temp/188-glenn.pdf?q=mag/docs-temp/188-glenn.pdf.

  • Grammer, Nicholas. 2008–2009. Integrating Civilian-Military Operations: The Comprehensive Approach and the ATF Experience. Paper Presented to the CPSA Annual Conference. Author’s copy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuser, Beatrice. 2010. The Evolution of Strategy: Thinking War from Antiquity to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Frank. 2009. Hybrid Warfare and Challenges. Joint Force Quarterly 52 (1): 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, Mary. 1999. New and Old Wars. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagassé, Philippe. 2010. Accountability for National Defence: Ministerial Responsibility, Military Command and Parliamentary Oversight. IRPP Study, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manley, John. 2008. Independent Panel on Canada’s Future Role in Afghanistan. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Karl (ed.) 2015. Precision and Purpose: Airpower in the Libyan Civil War. Santa Monica: RAND Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Williamson, and Peter Mansoor. 2012. Hybrid Warfare—Fighting Complex Opponents form the Ancient World to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NATO, Warsaw Summit Communiqué. 2016. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_133169.htm.

  • Patrick, Stewart, and Kaysie Brown. 2007. Greater than the Sum of Its Parts? Assessing Whole of Government Approaches to Fragile States. New York: International Peace Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Financial Management and Accountability. 1979. Final Report, 194. Hull: Canadian Government Publishing Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scales, Robert, Jr. 1998–1999. Trust, Not Technology, Sustains Coalitions. Parameters XXVIII (4): 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentz, Larry K. 1997. Intelligence Operations. In Lessons from Bosnia: The IFOR Experience. Washington, DC: National Defense University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather Hrychuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chuka, N., Hrychuk, H. (2020). CAF Operations: A Comprehensive Approach to Enable Future Operations. In: Juneau, T., Lagassé, P., Vucetic, S. (eds) Canadian Defence Policy in Theory and Practice. Canada and International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26403-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics