Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accountability and Democracy: An Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy Beyond Elections

Part of the book series: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century ((CDC))

  • 607 Accesses

Abstract

It is difficult to assess whether an accountability process following media allegations is democratic or not. Existing methods assess accountability by using crude proxies, such as democracy and elections. A more refined approach measures accountability in terms of investigations, explanations and sanctions. The chapter develops this latter line of research further by contributing an original database and a novel methodology. The book assesses accountability through a multidimensional measure, which encompasses the sanctioning power of various accountability forums, information about the type of accuser, the type of the accusation, the type of explanations that the government gives, the type of investigations and the type of sanctions. The accountability pyramid is the main methodological innovation that the book advances. The accountability pyramid measures how many sanctions various investigations produce, and visualises the relative sanctioning capacity of various investigative bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The only exception is that the impact of the presidential approval ratings in Russia differs slightly between the first differences model and the odds ratio model. In the chapter on Russia, I explain why this might be the case.

References

  • Adsera, Alicia, Carles Boix, and Mark Payne. 2000. Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government. Research Department Working Paper Series 438, Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucoin, P., and R. Heintzman. 2000. The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences 66 (1): 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Anthony. 1994. The Upturned Stone: Political Scandals and Their Investigation Processes in Twenty Democracies. Crime, Law and Social Change 21 (4): 337–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennetts, Marc. 2014. Kicking the Kremlin: Russia’s New Dissidents and the Battle to Topple Putin. Oneworld Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsman Transformation Index. Available at https://www.bti-project.org/en/country-reports/.

  • Besley, Timothy, and Andrea Prat. 2006. Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? The Role of the Media in Political Accountability. American Economic Review 96 (3): 720–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., Paul ’t Hart, A. McConell, and T. Preston. 2009. Towards a Theory of Crisis Exploitation: Political and Policy Impacts of Framing Contests and Blame Games. Journal of European Public Policy 16 (1): 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Mark. 2007. New Forms of Accountability and EU-Governance. Comparative European Politics 5: 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Mark. 2010. Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism. West European Politics 33 (5): 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Mark, Deirdre Curtin, and Paul ’t Hart (eds.). 2010. The Real World of EU Accountability: What Deficit? Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, Mark, Paul ’t Hart, S. Dekker, and G. Verheuvel. 1999. The Politics of Blame Avoidance: Defensive Tactics in a Dutch Crime-Fighting Fiasco. In When Things Go Wrong: Failures and Breakdowns in Organizational Settings, ed. H.K. Anheier, 123–147. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandsma, Gijs Jan, and Thomas Schillemans. 2012. The Accountability Cube: Measuring Accountability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brändstrøm, A., and S. Kuipers. 2003. From “Normal Incidents” to Political Crises: Understanding the Selective Politicization of Policy Failures. Government and Opposition 38 (3): 279–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bytzek, Evelyn. 2007. Politisches Ereignis: Diskussion, Definition and Auswahl. PhD dissertation, Mannheim University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2012. How the World Works. Hamish Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton, Timothy J. 2008. Yeltsin: A Life. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton, Timothy, and Michael McFaul. 2003. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy: The Russian Elections of 1999 and 2000. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W.T. 1998. An Analytic Framework for Crisis Situations: Better Responses from a Better Understanding of the Situation. Journal of Public Relations Research 10 (3): 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, James. 2016. Cultures of Democracy in Serbia and Bulgaria: How Ideas Shape Publics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, Donatella. 2012. Critical Trust: Social Movements and Democracy in Times of Crisis. Cambio 2 (4): 33–43. Available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/29983. Accessed February, 2015.

  • Dewan, Torun, and Keith Dowding. 2005. The Corrective Effect of Ministerial Resignations. American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimova, Gergana. 2019. Politicising Government Accountability: The Case of Protest Network and the Model “Who?” in Bulgaria. In Comparing Strategies of (De) Politicisation in Europe: Governance, Resistance and Anti-politics, ed. Jim Buller, Pınar E. Dönmez, Adam Standring, and Matthew Wood, 53–79. Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, Simeon, Caralee McLiesh, Tatiana Nenova, and Andrei Shleifer. 2001. Who Owns the Media? NBER Working Papers 8288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, John. 2010. Democracy and Its Discontents. The National Interest. Available at www.thelifeanddeathofdemocracy.org/reviews_commentaries/reviews_dunn_feb_2010.html. Accessed May 13, 2015.

  • Edelman, Murray. 1988. Constructing the Political Spectacle. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIU Democracy Index. Available at https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index.

  • Ercan, Selen, and Jean-Paul Gagnon. 2014. The Crisis of Democracy: Which Crisis? Which Democracy? Democratic Theory 1 (2): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, Matthew. 2001. The Politics of Accountability in the Modern State. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinders, Matthew, and Matthew Wood. 2013. Depoliticisation, Governance and the State. Policy and Politics 42 (2): 135–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House Democracy Index. Available at https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2019.

  • Funk, Carolyn. 1993. Personal Perception of Politicians Involved in Scandal. PhD dissertation, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganev, Venelin. 2014. The Legacies of 1989: Bulgaria’s Year of Civic Anger. Journal of Democracy 25 (1): 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, John, and James L. Newell. 2006. Scandals in Past and Contemporary Politics. Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Barbara. 1990. How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis 2 (1): 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genov, Julian. 2004. Why Do We Succeed So Little. Sofia: Iztok-Zapad Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, Stephen. 2008. Globalizing Élites in the Emerging World Order. In Power and Resistance in the New World Order. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, Ann, and Rob Jenkins. 2004. Reinventing Accountability: Making Democracy Work for the Poor. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, Paul. 2011. The Decline of Regionalism in Putins Russia: Boundary Issues. BASEES/Routledge Series on Russian and East European Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, Robert. 2003. Democratic Accountability: The Distinctiveness of the Third Sector. European Journal of Sociology 44 (3): 359–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, Michael, Ingunn Lunde, and Martin Paulsen. 2014. Digital Russia: The Language, Culture and Politics of New Media Communication. Routledge Contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R., and R.O. Keohane. 2005. Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Jeffrey. 2009. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Zachary, Shaun Bevan, and Caterina Froio. 2014. The Electoral Consequences of Government Accountability: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Conference, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Henry. 2005. Why Not Parties in Russia?: Democracy, Federalism, and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Stephen. 2010. Post-imperial Democracies: Ideology and Party Formation in Third Republic France, Weimar Germany, and Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig, Timothy, and David Samuels. 2007. Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes. British Journal of Political Science 38: 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Christopher. 2014. Accountability and Blame Avoidance. In The Oxford Handbook Public Accountability, ed. Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin, and Thomas Schillemans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C.C., W. Jennings, B. Hogwood, and C. Beeston. 2009. Fighting Fires in Testing Times: Exploring a Staged Response Hypothesis for Blame Management in Two Exam Fiasco Cases. European Journal of Political Research 48 (6): 695–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowicz, Karol, and Miklós Sükösd (eds.). 2008. Finding the Right Place on the Map: Central and Eastern European Media Change in a Global Perspective. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jileva, Elena. 2002. Insiders and Outsiders in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of Bulgaria. In In Search of Europe’s Borders, ed. Elspeth Guild and Kees Groenendijk. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, John, and Haig Patapan (eds.). 2009. Dispersed Democratic Leadership. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2008. Governance Matters VII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2007. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4654, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert. 2003. Global Governance and Democratic Accountability. In Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance, ed. Mathias Koenig-Archibugi and David Held, 130–159. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Anthony. 1984. Sex, Money and Power: Political Scandals in Great Britain and the United States. Department of Government, University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Ruud. 1993. The Dynamics of Protest Waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989. American Sociological Review 58 (5): 637–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Ruud. 1995. Democracy from Below: New Social Movements and the Political System in West Germany. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostovicova, Denisa, and Marlies Glasius. 2011. Bottom-Up Politics: An Agency-Centred Approach to Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2013. Democracy as a Moving Target. In Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization, ed. Hanspeter Kriesi, Daniel Bochsler, Jörg Matthes, and Sandra Lavenex. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, Alena. 2013. Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, D., N.V. Loayza, and R.R. Soares. 2005. Accountability and Corruption: Political Institutions Matter. Economics & Politics 17 (1): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Theodore. 1988. Forward. In The Politics of Scandal, ed. Mark Silverstein and Andrei Markovits. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Allen. 2005. How Russia Is Not Ruled: Reflections on Russian Political Development. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, Paolo. 2011. Between Commodification and Lifestyle Politics. Does Silvio Berlusconi Provide a New Model of Politics for the 21st Century? Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., and Johan Olson. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. 2003. Overview: Crisis Management, Influences, Responses and Evaluation. Parliamentary Affairs 56 (3): 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K.M. 1990. Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications. British Journal of Political Science 20 (1): 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. 1991. Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts. American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1133–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMann, Kelly. 2012. Economic Autonomy and Democracy: Hybrid Regimes in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, Richard. 2014. Accountability Deficits. In The Oxford Handbook Public Accountability, ed. Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin, and Thomas Schillemans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarria, Giovani. 2010. Citizens Go Online-Porbing the Political Potential of the Internet Galaxy. PhD dissertation, University of Westminster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, Sarah. 2006. Television, Democracy and Elections in Russia. BASEES/Routledge Series on Russian and East European Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 2003. Horizontal Accountability: The Legal Institutionalization of Mistrust. In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, ed. Matthew McCubbins and Thomas Schwartz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Dawn. 1991. Government in the United Kingdom. Bristol: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2013. Democracy in Crisis?: Politics, Governance and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, Torsten, Gérard Roland, and Guido Tabellini. 1997. Separation of Powers and Political Accountability. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4): 1163–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzotti, Enrique, and Catalina Smulovitz. 2006. Enforcing the Rule of Law: Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies. University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, John, and Adam Smith. 2005. Theorizing Transition: The Political Economy of Post-communist Transformations. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, Hannah. 2004. Representation and Democracy: An Uneasy Alliance. Scandinavian Political Studies 27 (3): 335–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polity Project. Available at https://nsd.no/macrodataguide/set.html?id=32&sub=1.

  • Randall, Vicky. 1998. Democratization and the Media. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2011. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Cameron. 2008. Local Politics and Democratization in Russia. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryabov, Andrei. 2012. Democratization and Modernization in the Context of Transformation of Post-Soviet Politics. In Democracy Versus Modernization: A Dilemma for Russia and for the World, ed. Vladislav Inozemtsev and Peotr Dutkiewicz. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, Richard. 2008. Russian Politics and Society. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, Richard. 2010. The Crisis of Russian Democracy: The Dual State, Factionalism and the Medvedev Succession. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakwa, Richard. 2014. Putin Redux: Power and Contradiction in Contemporary Russia. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schedler, Andreas. 2015. The Politics of Uncertainty: Sustaining and Subverting Electoral Authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schillemans, Thomas. 2011. Does Horizontal Accountability Work? Evaluating Potential Remedies for the Accountability Deficit of Agencies. Administration and Society 43 (4): 387–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe. 2004. The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability. Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe. 2007. Political Accountability in ‘Real-Existing’ Democracies: Meaning and Mechanisms. Available at http://www.eui.eu/Documents/DepartmentsCentres/SPS/Profiles/Schmitter/PCSPoliticalAccountabilityJan07.pdf. Accessed February 2015.

  • Schudson, Michael. 2003. Notes on Scandal and the Watergate Legacy. American Behavioral Scientist 47 (9): 1231–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharafutdinova, Gulnaz. 2011. Political Consequences of Crony Capitalism Inside Russia. University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shlapentokh, Vladimir, and Anna Arutunyan. 2013. Freedom, Repression, and Private Property in Russia. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, Matthew Søberg, and Scott Mainwaring. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America: Rethinking the Terms of the Debate. In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Matthew Søberg Shugart and Scott Mainwaring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Ann-Marie. 2004. Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks. Government and Opposition 31 (2): 159–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. 2004. Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics, Part 2. The American Economic Review 92 (3): 460–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. 2006. Resisting the State: Reform and Retrenchment in Post-Soviet Russia. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, John. 1997. Scandal and Social Theory. In Media Scandals, ed. James Lull and Stephen Hinerman. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, John. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Lily. 2007. Accountability Without Democracy: Solidary Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turpin, Colin. 1994. Ministerial Responsibility. In The Changing Constitution, ed. Jeffrey Jowell and Dawn Oliver. Oxford: Claredon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vibert, Frank. 2007. The Rise of the Unelected: Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, Michael. 1995. Adaptation of the Former Communist Parties of East-Central Europe: A Case of Social-Democratization? Party Politics 1 (4): 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R.K. 1986. The Politics of Blame Avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6 (4): 371–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Генов, Юлиан. 2004. Защо Толкова Малко Успяваме. Изток-Запад, София.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kръстева, Анна. 2014. „Граждански протести, Е-демокрация, Нови Мобилизации”. в В: Канев, Добрин., Тодоров, Антоний (съст.) Качество на Демокрацията в България. Изток-Запад, София.

    Google Scholar 

  • Канев, Добрин., Тодоров, Антоний (съст.). 2014. Качество на Демокрацията в България. Изток-Запад, София.

    Google Scholar 

  • Проданов, Георги. 2014. „Качество на Демокрацията и Качество на Елитите”. в В: Канев, Добрин., Тодоров, Антоний (съст.) Качество на Демокрацията в България. Изток-Запад, София.

    Google Scholar 

  • Хаджийски, Иван. 2002 (1966). Бит и Душевност на Нашия Народ. Български писател.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Social Sciences, Forensics and Politics, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK

    Gergana Dimova

Authors
  1. Gergana Dimova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gergana Dimova .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dimova, G. (2020). Accountability and Democracy: An Assessment. In: Democracy Beyond Elections. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25294-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation