Skip to main content

Fact Checking Misinformation Using Recommendations from Emotional Pedagogical Agents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11528))

Abstract

Dealing with complex and controversial topics like the spread of misinformation is a salient aspect of our lives. In this paper, we present initial work towards developing a recommendation system that uses crowd-sourced social argumentation with pedagogical agents to help combat misinformation. We model users’ emotional associations on such topics and inform the pedagogical agents using a recommendation system based on both the users’ emotional profiles and the semantic content from the argumentation graph. This approach can be utilized in either formal or informal learning settings, using threaded discussions or social networking virtual communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., Swami, A.: Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: Acm Sigmod Record, vol. 22, pp. 207–216. ACM (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R.J., Bry, L., Yarden, A.: Asking scientists: a decade of questions analyzed by age, gender, and country. Sci. Educ. 93(1), 131–160 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, L., Chen, G., Wang, F.: Recommender systems based on user reviews: the state of the art. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 25(2), 99–154 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, L., Pu, P.: Experiments on the preference-based organization interface in recommender systems. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17(1), 1–33 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1721831.1721836

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, L., Wang, F.: Sentiment-enhanced explanation of product recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 239–240. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 168–177. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H., Rajala, D.W.: Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 9(7), 403–403 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sethi, R., Rangaraju, R.: Extinguishing the backfire effect: using emotions in online social collaborative argumentation for fact checking. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, ICWS 2018, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2–7 July 2018, pp. 363–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2018.00062

  9. Sethi, R.J.: Crowdsourcing the verification of fake news and alternative facts. In: ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (ACM HT) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3078714.3078746

  10. Sethi, R.J.: Spotting fake news: a social argumentation framework for scrutinizing alternative facts. In: IEEE International Conference on Web Services (IEEE ICWS) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sethi, R.J., Bry, L.: The Madsci network: direct communication of science from scientist to layperson. In: International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sethi, R.J., Gil, Y.: A social collaboration argumentation system for generating multi-faceted answers in question & answer communities. In: CMNA at AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sethi, R.J., Rossi, L.A., Gil, Y.: Measures of threaded discussion properties. In: Intelligent Support for Learning in Groups at International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Explaining recommendations: design and evaluation. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 353–382. Springer, Boston, MA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7637-6_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wineburg, S., McGrew, S.: Lateral reading: reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to gratefully acknowledge support from the Amazon AWS Research Grant program. We would also like to thank Roger Azevedo for the valuable discussions and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricky J. Sethi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sethi, R.J., Rangaraju, R., Shurts, B. (2019). Fact Checking Misinformation Using Recommendations from Emotional Pedagogical Agents. In: Coy, A., Hayashi, Y., Chang, M. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11528. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22244-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22244-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22243-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22244-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics