Skip to main content

Analysis of Some Background Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The International Criminal Court and Peace Processes

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict ((PSCAC))

  • 311 Accesses

Abstract

Key issues on the relationship between international accountability and peace processes are discussed in this chapter. The chapter explores the nature, scope, challenges and dynamics of this relationship. Also, it highlights the problems, tensions and challenges embedded in the international justice system, and how these issues impede the ability of international justice mechanisms to contribute to peace processes. Some of the issues discussed are: transitional justice, the peace and justice dilemma, the ICC and deterrence, the ICC and reconciliation, the ICC and victims’ rights and the ICC and accountability to the law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thomas Buergenthal, interviewed by Newsweek, 6 July 2015. https://www.newsweek.com/british-judiciarylord-jannericc-judgeauschwitzjewsholocaustprofessor-law-602725. Accessed 21 January 2019.

  2. 2.

    OTP Prosecutorial Strategy, 2009–2012, 2010, 6, https://www.icc-cpi.int/nr/rdonlyres/66A8dcdc-3650-4514-AA62-D229D1128F65/281506/otpProsecutorialStrategy20092013.pdf. Accessed 27 December 2018.

  3. 3.

    United Nations Security Council Resolution 827 of 1993, adopted by the Security Council on 25 May 1993, https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N93/306/28/IMG/N9330628.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 28 December 2018.

  4. 4.

    United Nations Security Council Resolution 955 of 1994, adopted by the Security Council on 8 November 1994, https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N95/140/97/PDF/N9514097.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 28 December 2018.

  5. 5.

    Website of the United Nations International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, http://www.icty.org/en/about. Accessed 14 August 2018.

  6. 6.

    The 1945 Charter of the International Military Tribunal, http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_5.pdf. Accessed 29 December 2018.

  7. 7.

    UNGA Resolution 60/147 of 16 December 2005, http://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/ga_60-147/ga_60-147_ph_e.pdf. Accessed 29 December 2018.

  8. 8.

    The Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/blog/document/basic-principles-and-guidelines-on-the-right-to-a-remedy-and-reparation-for-victims-of-gross-violations-of-international-human-rights-law-and-serious-violations-of-international-humanitarian-law/. Accessed 29 December 2018.

References

  • Adam, Branch. 2011. “Neither Liberal Nor Peace: Practices of Global Justice by the ICC”. In The Problems and Practice of Peace-Building, edited by Susanna Campbell, David Chandler, and Meera Sabaratnam, 121–137. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Matthew. 2000. “Expressive Theory of Law: A Skeptical Overview”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148: 1364–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhavan, Payam. 2001. “Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?” The American Journal of International Law 95.7: 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aloyo, Eamon. 2012. “To Indict or Not to Indict? The ICC, Deterrence, and Nonviolent and Subordinate International Criminals”. Accessed June 20, 2013. https://wpsa.research.pdx.edu/meet/2012/aloyo.pdf.

  • Aloyo, Eamon, Yvonne Dutton, and Lindsay Heger. 2013. “Does the International Criminal Court Deter Torture?” One Earth Future Foundation. Accessed May 30, 2013. http://oneearthfuture.org/research/publications/does-international-criminalcourt-deter-torture.

  • Amann, Diane Marie. 2003. “Assessing the Criminal Adjudication of Human Rights Atrocities”. Third World Legal Studies 16: 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensouda, Fatou. 2013. “Justice, Reconciliation and the Role of the ICC, 2008”. Accessed April 15, 2013. www.idea.net/resources/analysis/.

  • Berghof Foundation. 2012. “Berghof Glossary of Conflict Transformation”. Berghof Foundation. Accessed May 28, 2013. http://www.berghof-foundation.org/.

  • Bloomfield, David, Teresa Barnes, and Luc Huyse, eds. 2003. “Reconciliation After Violent Conflict, International Institute of Electoral Assistance and Democracy”. Accessed February 11, 2016. http://www.un.org/en/peacebuilding.

  • Botes, Johannes. 2003. “Conflict Transformation: A Debate Over Semantics or a Crucial Shift in the Theory and Practice of Peace and Conflict Studies”. The International Journal of Peace Studies 8: 1–30. http://www.gmu.edu/pro#grams/icar/ijps/vol8_2/botes.htm.

  • Brilmayer, Lea. 1996. “International Justice and International Law”. Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 2441. Accessed June 10, 2013. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_paper/2441.

  • Chetail, Vincent. 2009. “Introduction: Post-conflict Peacebuilding-Ambiguity and Identity”. In Post-conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon, edited by Vincent Chetail, 1–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cryer, Robert. 2005. Prosecuting International Crimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darehshori, Sara, and Elizabeth Everson. 2010. “Peace, Justice and the International Criminal Court”. Oxford Transitional Justice Research Working Papers Series. Accessed May 1, 2013. http://www.otjr.csls.ox.ac.uk.

  • deGuzman, Margaret. 2012. “Choosing to Prosecute: Expressive Selection at the International Criminal Court”. Michigan Journal of International Law 33: 265–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doswald-Beck, Louise. 2009. “International Crimes”. In Post-conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon, edited by Vincent Chetail, 158–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumbl, Mark. 2007. Atrocity, Punishment and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Martina. 2010. “Transitional Justice and Reconciliation: Theory and Practice”. Accessed April 12, 2013. http://www.berghof-handbook.net/documents/publications/fisher_tj_and_rec_%20handbook.

  • Fletcher, Laurel, and Harvey Weinstein. 2002. “Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contributions of Justice to Reconciliation”. Human Rights Quarterly 24: 573–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallon, Gustavo. 2000. “Deterrence: A Difficult Challenge for the International Criminal Court”. The Helen Kellog Institute for International Studies. Volume 275 of Working Papers. Accessed March 31, 2013. http://www.kllogg.nd.edu.

  • Garkawe, Sam. 2003. “Victims and the International Criminal Court: Three Major Issues”. International Criminal Law Review 3: 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gever, Christopher. 2011. “A Theory of International Criminal Law?” Accessed June 9, 2013. http://www.warandlaw.blogspot.com.au.

  • Goetz, Mariana. 2008. “The International Criminal Court and Its Relevance to Affected Communities”. In Courting Conflict? Peace and the ICC, edited by Nicholas Waddel and Phil Clark. Royal African Society. Accessed May 20, 2013. http://www.royalafrican/society.org.

  • Golash, Deirdre. 2010. “The Justification of Punishment in the International Context”. In International Criminal Law and Philosophy, edited by Larry May and Zachary Hoskins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grono, Nick. 2012. “The Deterrent Effect of the ICC on the Commission of International Crimes by Government Leaders”. Accessed April 23, 2014. http://www.crisesgroup.org/en/publication.

  • Hopkins-Burke, Roger. 2009. An Introduction to Criminology. Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2009. “Selling Justice Short: Why Accountability Matters for Peace.” Human Rights Watch Report. Accessed May 2, 2013. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/ij0709webwcover_1.pdf.

  • International Centre for Transitional Justice. 2009. “Pursuing Peace, Justice or Both?” International Centre for Transitional Justice Report. Accessed April 29, 2013. www.ictj.org.

  • Keller, Linda. 2008. “Achieving Peace with Justice: The International Criminal Court and Uganda Alternative Justice Mechanisms”. Connecticut Journal of International Law 23: 210–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Hunjoon, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2009. “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries”. International Studies Quarterly 54: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, Mateus. 2011. “The International Criminal Court: Reflections for a Stress Test on Its Foundations”. JANUS.NET e-Journal of International Relations 2: 110–124. Accessed June 12, 2014. http://observare.ual.pt/janus.net/en/home-eng/54-englishen/vol-2,-n-º2-autumn-2011/articles/8-the-international-crimina.

  • Lanz, David. 2007. “The ICC’s Intervention in Northern Uganda: Beyond the Simplicity of Peace vs. Justice”. Accessed September 4, 2014. http://www.reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/EC66215A0071F156C12573910051D06D-Full_Report.pdf.htm.

  • Lederach, John Paul. 2001. “Civil Society and Reconciliation.” In Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, edited by Chester Croaker, Fen Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 603–618. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, John Paul. 2003. The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maiese, Michelle. 2004. “Retributive Justice”. Beyond Intractability. https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/retributive.justice.

  • Mallinder, Louise. 2008. Amnesty, Human Rights and Political Transitions: Building the Peace and Justice Divide. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Larry, and Zachary Hoskins. 2010. International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, Conor. 2012. “Victims’ Redress and International Criminal Justice”. Journal of International Criminal Justice 10: 352–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, Tim, and Marlies Glasius. 2013. “Expression of Justice or Political Trial? Discursive Battles in the Karadzic Case”. Human Right Quarterly 35: 720–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, Errol. 2010. Peace and Justice at the International Criminal Court: A Court of Last Resort. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, Juan. 2010. “National Reconciliation, Transitional Justice, and the International Criminal Court”. Ethics and International Affairs 15: 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miall, Hugh. 2013. “Conflict Transformation: A Multi-Dimensional Task”. Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management. Accessed May 12, 2013. http://www.berghof-handbook.net/.

  • Miall, Huge, Oliver Ramsbotham, and Tom Woodhouse. 1999. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalepa, Monika. 2009. “Reconciliation, Refuge Returns, and International Criminal Justice: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina”. In Transitional Justice, edited by Melissa Williams, Rosemary Nagy Williams, and Jon Elster, 316–361. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek. 2015. “Former International Court of Justice Judge: Dick Cheney Should Face Prosecution”. Newsweek. July 6. Accessed January 21, 2019. https://www.newsweek.com/british-judiciarylord-jannericc-judgeauschwitzjewsholocaustprofessor-law-602725.

  • Nouwen, Sarah. 2012. “The International Criminal Court: A Peacebuilder in Africa?” In Peacebuilding, Power, and Politics in Africa, edited by Curtis Devon and Dzinesa Gwinyayi, 171–192. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogbu, Osita. 1999. Human Rights, Law and Practice in Nigeria: An Introduction. Enugu: CIDJAP Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwudiwe, Ihekwoaba, Jonathan Odo, and Emmanuel Onyeozil. 2010. “Deterrence Theory.” Accessed April 30, 2013. http://marisluste.files.wordpress.com/.

  • REDRESS. 2013. “Justice for Victims: The ICC’s Reparation Mandate.” Accessed May 3, 2013. http://www.redress.org/downloads/publications/REDRESS_ICC_Reparations_May2011.pdf.

  • Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2006. “The New Landscape of Transitional Justice”. In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth Versus Justice, edited by Naomi Roht-Arriaza and Javier Mariezcurrena, 1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, Sheri. 2012. “The Relationship Between the International Criminal Court and the Prevention of Mass Atrocities.” Accessed April 24, 2014. http://www.genocidepreventionnow.org/Portals/0/docs/Relationship_ICC_Prevention_HU.pdf.

  • Schabas, William. 2007. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabas, William. 2011. “Transitional Justice and the Norms of International Law”. Japanese Society of International Law, Kwansei Gakun University. Accessed April 2, 2013. www.jsil.jp/annual_documents/2011.

  • Scheffer, David 1999. “War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity”. Pace International Law Review 112: 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaar, Elin. 2013. “Reconciliation in a Transitional Justice Perspective”. Transitional Justice Review 1: 54–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Steven. 2012. “Expressive Jurisprudence and the Depletion of Meaning”. Maryland Law Review 60: 507–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahn, Carsten. 2009. “The Future of International Criminal Justice”. The Hague Justice Portal. Accessed April 12, 2013. http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/index.php?id=11106.

  • Starkweather, David. 1992. “The Retributive Theory of ‘Just Desserts’ and Victims’ Participation in Plea Bargaining”. Indiana Law Journal 67: 853–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strudler, Alan. 2001. “The Power of Expressive Theories of Law”. Maryland Law Review 60: 492–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, Ruti. 2000. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenove, Chris. 2013. “Uganda and the International Criminal Court: Debates and Developments”. Accessed July 17, 2014. http://www.africaportal.org.htm.

  • Tolbert, David. 2013. “Can International Justice Foster Reconciliation?” Accessed April 16, 2013. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/04/20134107435444190.htm.

  • United States Institute for Peace. 2015. “Accountability to Law”. Accessed March 23, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, Alex. 2013. “The International Criminal Court Impact”. Accessed April 22, 2013. http://today.law.harvard.edu/whiting-offers-views-on-the-international-criminal-courts-impact/.

  • Williams, George, Sean Brennan, and Andrew Lynch. 2014. Australian Constitutional Law: Commentary and Materials. Sydney: The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippman, David. 1999. “Atrocities, Deterrence, and the Limits of International Justice”. Fordman International Law Journal 23: 473–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Andrew. 2012. “Moral Judgment and International Crimes: The Disutility of Desert”. Virginia Journal of International Law 52: 634–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Valerie. 2010. “Deterrence in Criminal Justice: Evaluating Certainty vs. Severity of Punishment”. The Sentencing Project. Accessed May 20, 2013. http://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Deterrence-inCriminal-Justice.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malu, L.N. (2019). Analysis of Some Background Issues. In: The International Criminal Court and Peace Processes . Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19905-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19905-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19904-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19905-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics