Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict ((PSCAC))

  • 320 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explains the rationale for the study, the research questions, the study’s analytical framework, and the nexus between international accountability and peace. It provides a brief outline of the establishment and challenges of the ICC, the major theories of punishment discussed in the book, the structure of the book, the doctrine of complementarity, the punishment provisions of the Rome Statute, the methodology of the study, the main findings of the study and some key terms like: peace, peace process, justice, and conflict transformation. It also highlights the tensions and challenges of deploying an international Court in national settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    De Vos, Christian, Kendall, Sara and Stahn, Carten. 2015. “Introduction”. In Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, edited by Christian de Vos, Sara Kendall, and Carsten Stahn, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  2. 2.

    https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails. Accessed 18 October 2018.

  3. 3.

    Statement of the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court issued on 5 December 2014, https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=otp-statement-05-12-2014-2&ln=en. Accessed 18 October 2018.

  4. 4.

    Situation in the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire in the Case of the Prosecutor V. Simone Gbagbo. Decision on Côte d’Ivoire’s challenge to the admissibility of the case against Simone Gbagbo (No.: ICC-02/11-01/12). https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2014_10019.PDF. Accessed 18 October 2018.

  5. 5.

    The Prosecutor v. Walter Osapiri Barasa, ICC-01/09-01/13 (The arrest warrant was issued under seal against Mr. Barasa on 2 August 2013 and unsealed on 2 October 2013). (The case “remains in the Pre-Trial stage, pending the suspect’s arrest or voluntary appearance before the Court”.); The Prosecutor v. Paul Gicheru and Philip Kipkoech Bett, ICC-01/09-01/15 (The warrant of arrest was issued under “seal against Paul Gicheru and Philip Kipkoech Bett on 10 March 2015 and unsealed on 10 September 2015. Accused are not in the Court’s custody. The case remains in the Pre-Trial stage, pending the suspects’ arrest or voluntary appearance before the Court”.

  6. 6.

    Statement of the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on 6 April 2016, https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=otp-stat-160406. Accessed 19 October 2018.

  7. 7.

    http://www.iccnow.org/index.php?mod=romeimplementation. Accessed 19 October 2018.

  8. 8.

    The Trial Chamber for the Special Court for Sierra Leone on 26 April 2012 found Charles Taylor guilty on all eleven counts, on “the modes of liability of planning of crimes and for aiding and abetting of crimes committed by rebel forces in Sierra Leone”, and on 30 May 2012, the former Liberian president was given a single sentence of 50 years in prison. The Appeals Chamber upheld Charles Taylor’s conviction and 50-year sentence (The Prosecutor vs. Charles Ghankay Taylor, SCSL-03-01-T). http://rscsl.org/Taylor.html. Accessed 19 October 2018.

  9. 9.

    Interview with a researcher from Kenya, 2014.

  10. 10.

    E-Interview with a member of the defence team of Uhuru Kenyatta, 2015.

  11. 11.

    The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11.

  12. 12.

    ICC-01/09-02/11-383 of 30 January 2012.

  13. 13.

    ICC-01/11-01/11-466 of 11 October 2013.

  14. 14.

    Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo ICC-01/04-01/06.

  15. 15.

    Office of the Prosecutor Strategic Plan June, 2012–2015, 9, https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/otp/OTP-Strategic-Plan-2013.pdf. Accessed 23 October 2018.

  16. 16.

    Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga ICC-01/04-01/07.

  17. 17.

    Decision on Sentence pursuant to article 76 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/06-2901, 13 July 2012.

  18. 18.

    Decision on Sentence pursuant to article 76 of the Statute, ICC-01/04-01/07-3484-tENG-Corr, 23 May 2014.

  19. 19.

    Decision on Sentence pursuant to article 76 of the Statute, ICC-01/05-01/08-3399, 21 June 2016.

  20. 20.

    Judgment and Sentence, The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi, CC-01/12-01/15-171, 27 September 2016.

References

  • Akhavan, Payam. 2001. “Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?” The American Journal of International Law 95.7: 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amann, Diane Marie. 2003. “Assessing the Criminal Adjudication of Human Rights Atrocities”. Third World Legal Studies 16: 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, Christine and Juanita Goebertus. 2014. “Complementarity in Action: The Role of Civil Society and the ICC in Rule of Law Strengthening in Kenya”. Yale Human Rights Law and Development Journal 14: 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, Heidi. 2004. “Peace Processes: What Are They?” Beyond Intractability. Accessed April 15, 2015. http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/peace-processes.

  • Clark, Janine. 2011. “Peace, Justice and the International Criminal Court”. Journal of International Criminal Justice 9: 521–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vos, Christian, Sara Kendall, and Carten Stahn. 2015. “Introduction”. In Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, edited by Christian de Vos, Sara Kendall, and Carten Stahn, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drumbl, Mark. 2007. Atrocity, Punishment and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Du Max, Plessis. 2010. The International Court Africa Wants. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies, Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faleti, Ademola. 2006. “Theories of Social Conflict”. In Introduction to Peace and Conflict Studies in Africa: A Reader, edited by Shedrack Best, 35–60. Ibadan: Spectrum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Laurel and Harvey Weinstein. 2002. “Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contributions of Justice to Reconciliation”. Human Rights Quarterly 24: 573–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, David. 2006. Peace and Conflict Studies: An African Overview of Basic Concepts. In Introduction to Peace and Conflict Studies in Africa: A Reader, edited by Shedrack Best. Ibadan: Spectrum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, Steven. 2010. “Effectiveness of International Criminal Justice.” Accessed September 20, 2015. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ALRS/2008/16.html.

  • Galtung, John. 1996. Peace by Peaceful Means. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldston, James. 2016. “Three Lessons from the ICC’s Kenya Debacle. Open Society Foundation”. Open Society Foundation, April 6. Accessed April 15, 2016. https://medium.com/open-society-foundations/three-lessons-from-the-icc-s-kenyadebacle-515df408531b#.fs9dlxwre.

  • Human Rights Watch. 2016. “To Consolidate This Peace of Ours.” Human Rights Watch Report. Accessed February 28, 2016. http://www.hrw.org/report/2015/12/08/consolidate-peace-ours/human-rights-agenda-cotedivoire.

  • Ibeanu, Okechukwu. 2006. “Conceptualising Peace”. In Introduction to Peace and Conflict Studies in Africa: A Reader, edited by Shedrack Best. Ibadan: Spectrum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Centre for Transitional Justice. 2013 “Criminal Justice.” International Centre for Transitional Justice Briefing. Accessed May 10, 2013. http://www.ictj.org.

  • International Crises Group. 2012. “Kenya: Impact of the ICC Proceedings.” International Crises Group: Policy Briefing, Africa Briefing No. 84. Accessed April 12, 2016. http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/africa/horn-of-africa/kenya/b084kenya.

  • Jenkins, Bert and Marty Branagan. 2014. “Introduction”. In Cultivating Peace, edited by Helen Ware, Bert Jerkins, Marty Branagan, and D.B. Subedi, 1–16. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurdi, Nidal Nabil. 2011. The International Criminal Court and National Courts: A Contentious Relationship. Surry: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, Mark. 2014. “The ICC and Its Impact: More Known Unknowns”. Accessed December 24, 2014. https://justiceinconflict.org/2014/11/05/the-icc-and-its-impactmore-known-unknowns/.

  • Ku, Julian and Jide Nzeribe. 2006. “Do International Criminal Tribunals Deter or Exacerbate Humanitarian Atrocities?” Washington University Law Review 84: 777–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladan, Muhammed. 2010. “Immunity of Heads of State and the Jurisdiction of ICC Under the Rome Statute”. Accessed April 21, 2016. http://mtladan.blogspot.com.au/.

  • Lederach, John Paul. 2003. The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. Intercourse, PA: Good Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Jessica. 2011. Transitional Justice, Peace and Accountability. Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malu, Linus. 2015. “The International Criminal Court and Conflict Transformation in Uganda: Views from the Field”. African Journal on Conflict Resolution 15: 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, Tim and Marlies Glasius. 2013. “Expression of Justice or Political Trial? Discursive Battles in the Karadzic Case”. Human Right Quarterly 35: 720–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, Juan and Jeremy Kelly. 2015. “Peace Making, Justice and the ICC”. In Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions edited by Christian de Vos, Sara Kendall, and Carsten Stahn, 479–496. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miall, Huge, Oliver Ramsbotham, and Tom Woodhouse. 1999. Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, Luke. 2014. Victims Before the International Criminal Court. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Sussane. 2014. “Kenya and the International Criminal Court: Politics, the Election and the Law”. Journal of East African Studies 8: 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouwen, Sarah. 2012. “The International Criminal Court: A Peacebuilder in Africa?” In Peacebuilding, Power, and Politics in Africa, edited by Devon Curtis and Gwinyayi Dzinesa, 171–192. Athens: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nouwen, Sarah. 2013. Complementarity in the Line of Fire: The Catalysing Effect of the International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plooy, G.M., ed. 1995. Introduction to Communication. Cape Town: Juta Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramcharan, Bertrand. 2009. “Peace Process”. In Post-conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon, edited by Vincent Chetail, 229–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, Sophie. 2014. “Unsettled Times at The Hague.” Accessed November 19, 2014. http://insidestory.org.au/unsettled-times-at-thehague.

  • Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2006. “The New Landscape of Transitional Justice”. In Transitional Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice, edited by Naomi Roht-Arriaza and Javier Mariezcurrena, 1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Harold. 2001. “Renegotiation and Circum-negotiation: Arenas of multilevel Peace Process”. In Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, edited by Chester Croaker, Fen Hampson and Pamela Aall, 483–496. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabas, William. 2001. “International Law Responses to Conflict”. In Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, edited by Chester Croaker, Fen Hampson and Pamela Aall, 603–618. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schabas, William. 2007. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schabas, William. 2011. “Transitional Justice and the Norms of International Law”. Japanese Society of International Law, Kwansei Gakuin University. Accessed April 2, 2013.www.jsil.jp/annual_documents/2011.

  • Schabas, Williams. 2012. Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, Ruti. 2011. Humanity’s Law. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turano, Laura. 2011. “The Gender Dimension of Transitional Justice”. New York University International Law and Politics 43:1045–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program. 2011. “Strengthening the Rule of Law in Crisis-Affected and Fragile Situations”. Accessed June 2, 2015 http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/crisis%20prevention/Global%20Programme%20Phase%20II%20-%20FINAL.pdf.

  • Ware, Helen. 2014. “What Does the Person on the Street Corner Want? Growing Peace Through Democracy: Issues with Hybridity”. In Cultivating Peace, edited by Helen Ware, Bert Jerkins, Marty Branagan, and D.B. Subedi, 17–54. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, Patrick. 2015. International Criminal Court in Ongoing Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Sarah. 2012. Hybrid and Internationalized Criminal Tribunals: Selected Jurisdictional Issues. Oregon: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmot, Amanda. 2006. “Designing Sampling Strategies for Qualitative Social Research: With Particular Reference to the Office for National Statistics’ Qualitative Respondent Register”. Accessed April 20, 2016. http://www.cdc.gov/qbank/QUest/2005/Paper23.pdf.

  • Wippman, David. 1999. “Atrocities, Deterrence, and the Limits of International Justice”. Fordman International Law Journal 23: 473–488.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Malu, L.N. (2019). Introduction. In: The International Criminal Court and Peace Processes . Palgrave Studies in Compromise after Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19905-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19905-0_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19904-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19905-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics