Abstract
This chapter provides analyses of the interactive organization of Goffman’s participation frameworks. The chapter attempts to explain the role of participation frameworks, which shop-owners and customers jointly display to each other’s performance. This signals their definition of the situation where the participants interact and form a community of practice in lieu of exclusively adhering to the merchant and customer relationship. This line of inquiry, which investigates how subtle changes in social actors’ position, role or stance may reshape or affect the direction of the ongoing talk, is a useful approach to gaining a finer understanding of interaction in the shop under scrutiny.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
For the key elements of Goffman’s Participation Framework and footing, see Chap. 2.
References
Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Al Zidjaly, N. (2009). Agency as an interactive achievement. Language in Society, 38(2), 177–200.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bateson, G. (1955/1972). A theory of play and fantasy: In steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
Becker, A. L. (1995). Beyond translation: Essays towards a modern philology. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coupland, J., Coupland, N., & Robinson, J. D. (1992). “How are You?”: Negotiating phatic communion. Language in Society, 21(2), 207–230.
Coupland, N., & Ylänne-McEwen, V. (2000). Talk about the weather: Small talk, leisure talk and the travel industry. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 163–182). London: Pearson Education.
Dovchin, S., Pennycook, A., & Sultana, S. (2017). Popular culture, voice and linguistic diversity: Young adults on- and offline. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2015). The language of service encounters: A pragmatic-discursive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Pantheon Books.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic.
Goodwin, C. (2007). Interactive footing. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction (pp. 16–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessment. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, 1(1), 1–52.
Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1992). Context, activity and participation. In P. Auer & A. D. Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 77–99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 303–317.
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). Byplay: Participant structure and framing of collaborative collusion. Réseaux, 2, 155–180.
Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Shifting frame. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp (pp. 71–82). Norwood, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gordon, C. (2003). Aligning as a team: Forms of conjoined participation in (stepfamily) interactions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(4), 395–431.
Gordon, C. (2009). Making meanings, creating family: Intertextuality and framing in family interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gordon, C. (2015). Framing and positioning. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gumperz, J. (1992). Interviewing in intercultural situations. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 302–327). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge.
Izadi, D. (2017). Semiotic resources and mediational tools in Merrylands, Sydney, Australia: The case of Persian and Afghan shops. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 495–512.
Jaworski, A., Thurlow, C., Lawson, S., & Ylänne-McEwen, V. (2003a). The uses and representations of local languages in tourist destinations: A view from British TV holiday programmes. Language Awareness, 12(1), 5–29.
Jaworski, A., Ylänne-McEwen, V., Thurlow, C., & Lawson, S. (2003b). Social roles and the negotiation of status in host–tourist interaction: A view from British television holiday programmes. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(2), 135–163.
Jones, R. (2011). C me Sk8: Discourse, technology and bodies without organs. In C. Thrulow & K. Mroczek (Eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media (pp. 321–339). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, R. H. (2005). Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse. In N. Norris & R. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 141–154). New York: Routledge.
Jones, R. H. (2009). Dancing, skating and sex: Action and text in the digital age. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 283–302.
Jones, R. H. (2016). Spoken discourse. London: Bloomsbury.
Kendall, S. (2008). The balancing act: Framing gendered parental identities at dinnertime. Language in Society, 37(4), 539–569.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lerner, G. H. (1993). Collectivities in action: Establishing the relevance of conjoined participation in conversation. Text, 13(2), 213–245.
Levinson, S. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s participation framework. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Goffman: Exploring the interaction order (pp. 161–227). Oxford: Polity Press.
Malinowski, B. (1923/1972). Phatic communion. In J. Laver & S. Hutcheson (Eds.), Communication in face-to-face interaction (pp. 146–152). Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UK: Penguin.
Mortensen, K., & Hazel, S. (2014). Moving into an interaction—Embodied practices for initiating interactions at a help desk counter. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 46–67.
Norris, S. (2002). The implication of visual research for discourse analysis. Visual Communication, 1(1), 97–121.
Peräkylä, A., & Vehvilƒinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society, 14(6), 727–750.
Sarangi, S. (2010). Reconfiguring self/identity/status/role: The case of professional role performance in healthcare encounters. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 7(1), 75–95.
Schiffrin, D. (1993). “Speaking for another” in sociolinguistic interviews: Alignments, identities, and frames. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 231–263). New York: Oxford University Press.
Scollon, R. (2008). Discourse itineraries: Nine processes of resemiotization. In V. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. Jones (Eds.), Advances in discourse studies (pp. 233–244). London: Routledge.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2007). Nexus analysis: Refocusing ethnography on action. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 608–625.
Tannen, D. (2004). Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(4), 399–420.
Tannen, D. (2006). Intertextuality in interaction: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text & Talk, 26(4–5), 597–617.
Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tannen, D., & Wallet, C. (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 57–76). New York: Oxford University Press.
Tracy, K., & Coupland, N. (1990). Multiple goals in discourse: An overview of issues. In K. Tracy & N. Coupland (Eds.), Multiple goals in discourse (pp. 1–14). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ylänne-Mcewen, V. (1997). Relational processes within a transactional setting: An investigation of travel agency discourse. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff.
Ylänne-McEwen, V. (2004). Shifting alignment and negotiating sociality in travel agency discourse. Discourse Studies, 6(4), 517–536.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Izadi, D. (2020). Framing and Footing: Negotiation of Roles and Status. In: The Spatial and Temporal Dimensions of Interactions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19584-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19584-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19583-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19584-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)