Skip to main content

The Game-Theoretic National Interstate Economic Model: Economically Optimizing U.S. Aviation Security Policies Against Terrorist Attacks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Spatial and Economic Modeling of Disaster Impacts

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 740 Accesses

Abstract

The study proposes an approach to assessing airport and aviation security policies, which incorporates terrorist attack behaviors with economic impacts stemming from disruption of U.S. airport systems. Terrorist attacks involve complicated strategic behaviors of terrorists, while various defenders need to consider the degree of negative impacts that may occur via complicated paths. Simultaneous attacks will make this situation more complicated, because defending entities must secure airports and aviation systems with more tightly integrated inter-governmental collaborations. This study, for the first time, suggests a dynamic method to design the complicated micro-level behavioral strategies with macro-level economic impacts. In terms of game strategies, the current study only considers a competitive game situation between a defender and an attacker. In terms of the macro-level economic model, the National Interstate Economic Model (NIEMO) is introduced, which is a spatially disaggregated economic model used for the U.S. By combining these two approaches, a new framework is called the Game Theoretic National Interstate Economic Model (G-NIEMO). G-NIEMO, then, can be used to assess probabilistic costs of airport closure when potential terrorist attacks occur under the circumstance of considering the allocation of a government’ resources for designing airport security optimally by event location and industry type. NIEMO has been widely applied through a variety of empirical studies, but the competitive game model has not yet combined successfully. Based on the basic algorithm applied in the “attacker-defender game,” this chapter explains how G-NIEMO could be achieved. Further, establishing a cooperative coordination system and collective countermeasures against terrorism is necessary to cope with much more complicated forms of terrorist attacks such as simultaneous attacks and cyber-attacks. G-NIEMO can meet these needs through a collaborative gaming model. When applying G-NIEMO practically to simulate comprehensive defense strategies, for example, for urban critical infrastructure systems, corresponding estimated probabilistic impacts can be prepared. Therefore, G-NIEMO can be used to establish equilibrium strategies for protecting U.S. territory, creating general guidelines and assessing government resource allocations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABC (2013) Article available at https://www.abc15.com/news/national/lax-airport-shooting-shots-fired-at-lax-airport-evacuated

  • American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2013) A framework for aviation cybersecurity. An AIAA decision paper

    Google Scholar 

  • ARTBA (2010) The 2010 U.S. Transportation Construction Industry Profile. ARTBA Transportation Development Foundation, available at: http://www.artba.org/Economics/Econ-Breakouts/04_EconomicImpactInterruptedService.pdf. Accessed November 2012

  • Benkler Y (2011a) The penguin and the leviathan: the triumph of cooperation over self-interest. Crown, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler Y (2011b) The unselfish gene. Harv Bus Rev 89(7–8):76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Bier VM (2007) Choosing what to protect. Risk Anal 27(3):607–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bier V, Oliveros S, Samuelson L (2007) Choosing what to protect: strategic defensive allocation against an unknown attacker. J Public Econ Theory 9(4):563–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bier VM, Haphuriwat N, Menoyo J, Zimmerman R, Culpen AM (2008) Optimal resource allocation for defense of targets based on differing measures of attractiveness. Risk Anal 28(3):763–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Carlyle M, Salmerón J, Wood K (2005) Analyzing the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to attack and planning defenses. In: Greenberg HJ, Smith JC (eds) Tutorials in operations research: emerging theory, methods, and applications. INFORMS, Hanover, pp 102–123

    Google Scholar 

  • CBP (2008) About border security. Available at http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/border_security/bs/. Accessed September 2008

  • Chenery HB (1953) The structure and growth of the Italian economy: United States of America, Mutual Security Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel G, Arce M, Sandler T (2003) An evolutionary game approach to fundamentalism and conflict. J Inst Theor Econ JITE 159(1):132–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mesquita EB (2005a) Conciliation, counterterrorism, and patterns of terrorist violence. Int Organ 59(01):145–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mesquita EB (2005b) The terrorist endgame: a model with moral hazard and learning. J Confl Resolut 49(2):237–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dighe NS, Zhuang J, Bier VM (2009) Secrecy in defensive allocations as a strategy for achieving more cost-effective attacker deterrence. Int J Performability Eng 5(1):31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon PB, Lee B, Muehlenbeck T, Rimmer MT, Rose A, Verikios G (2010) Effects on the US of an H1N1 epidemic: analysis with a quarterly CGE model. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 7(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons R (1992) Game theory for applied economists. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P, Moore JE II, Park JY, Richardson HW (2007) The economic impacts of a terrorist attack on the US commercial aviation system. Risk Anal 27(3):505–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P, Moore JE II, Park JY, Richardson HW (2009a) The economic costs of border closure: a state-by-state analysis. In: Richardson HW, Gordon P, Moore JE II (eds) Global business and the terrorist threat. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 341–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P, Park JY, Richardson HW (2009b) Modeling input-output impacts with substitutions in the household sector: a numerical example. Econ Model 26(3):696–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan P, Zhuang J (2016) Modeling resources allocation in attacker-defender games with “warm up” CSF. Risk Anal 36(4):776–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao M, Zhuang J, Jin S (2009) Robustness of optimal defensive resource allocations in the face of less fully rational attacker. In: Proceedings of the 2009 industrial engineering research conference, Miami, FL, pp 886–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausken K, Zhuang J (2011) Governments’ and terrorists’ defense and attack in a T-period game. Decis Anal 8(1):46–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausken K, Zhuang J (2012) The timing and deterrence of terrorist attacks due to exogenous dynamics. J Oper Res Soc 63(6):726–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausken K, Bier V, Zhuang J (2009) Defending against terrorism, natural disaster, and all hazards. In: Bier VM, Azaiez MN (eds) Game theoretic risk analysis of security threats. Springer, New York, pp 65–97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (1989) Conflict and rent-seeking success functions: ratio vs. difference models of relative success. Public Choice 63(2):101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer J (1995) Anarchy and its breakdown. J Pol Econ 103:26–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard W (1951) Interregional and regional input-output analysis: a model of a space economy. Rev Econ Stat 33:318–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakdawalla D, Zanjani G (2005) Insurance, self-protection, and the economics of terrorism. J Public Econ 89(9):1891–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee B, Park JY, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW (2012) Estimating the state-by-state economic impacts of a foot-and-mouth disease attack. Int Reg Sci Rev 35(1):26–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major JA (2002) Advanced techniques for modeling terrorism risk. J Risk Finance 4(1):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses LN (1955) The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis. Am Econ Rev 45:803–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggy L, Heier Stamm JL (2014) Game theory applications in humanitarian operations: a review. J Humanitarian Logist Supply Chain Manag 4(1):4–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoofal ME, Zhuang J (2012) Robust allocation of a defensive budget considering an attacker’s private information. Risk Anal 32(5):930–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak M, Highfield R (2011) SuperCooperators: altruism, evolution, and why we need each other to succeed. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne MJ (2004) An introduction to game theory. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Economics (2009) Aviation: the real world wide web. Onward, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Economics (2010) The economic impacts of air travel restrictions due to volcanic ash. Available at: http://www.oxfordeconomics.com/FREE/PDFS/OEAVIATION09.PDF. Accessed November 2012

  • Park JY (2008) The economic impacts of a dirty-bomb attack on the Los Angeles and Long Beach Port: applying supply-driven NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model). J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 5(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park C, Park JY (2016) Panama canal expansion, U.S. trade diversion from west coast seaports and urban innovation. J Open Innov 2(12)

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Park CK, Nam S (2006) The state-by-state economic impacts of mad cow disease on the United States. In: A proceeding paper of 2006 American Agricultural Economic Association (AAEA) annual meeting, Long Beach, CA, July 23–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW, Wang L (2007) Simulating the state-by-state effects of terrorist attacks on three major U.S. ports: applying NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model). In: Richardson HW, Gordon P, Moore JE II (eds) The economic costs and consequences of terrorism. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 208–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW (2008a) The state-by-state economic impacts of the 2002 shutdown of the Los Angeles-Long Beach ports. Growth Change 39(4):548–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW, Kim S, Kim Y (2008b) Estimating the state-by-state economic impacts of hurricane Katrina. In: Richardson HW, Gordon P, Moore JE II (eds) Natural disaster analysis after hurricane Katrina. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 147–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW (2009) A two-step approach to estimating state-by-state commodity trade flows. Ann Reg Sci 43(4):1033–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Cho J, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW, Yoon S (2011) Adding a freight network to a national interstate input-output model: a TransNIEMO application for California. J Transp Geogr 19(6):1410–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW (2013) The interregional and interindustry impacts of the gulf oil spill: applying the National Interstate Economic Model (NIEMO). J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 10(1):231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Son M, Hwang H, Cho D, Park C (2016) A new framework to quantifying the economic impacts of cyberattacks on aviation systems: a Korean game-theoretic interregional economic model. In: Kim E, Kim BH (eds) Quantitative regional economic and environmental analysis for sustainability in Korea (New frontiers in regional science: Asian perspectives). Springer, Singapore, pp 153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Son M, Park C (2017a) Natural disasters and deterrence of economic innovation: a case of temporary job losses by hurricane Sandy. J Open Innov 3:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW (2017b) A new approach to quantifying the impact of hurricane-disrupted oil refinery operations utilizing secondary data. Group Decis Negotiation 26(6):1125–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JY, Levy J, Son M, Park C, Hwang H (2018) Advances in cybersecurity design: an integrated framework to quantify the economic impacts of cyber-terrorist behavior. In: Masys AJ (ed) Security by design: innovative perspectives on complex problems. Springer, Cham, pp 317–339

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson HW, Park JY (2014) The Joplin tornado of 2011. In: Richardson HW, Park JY, Moore JE II, Pan Q (eds) National economic impact analysis of terrorist and natural disasters. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 192–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson HW, Gordon P, Moore JE II, Kim SJ, Park JY, Pan Q (2007) Tourism and terrorism: the national and interregional economic impacts of attacks on major U.S. theme parks. In: Richardson HW, Gordon P, Moore JE II (eds) The economic costs and consequences of terrorism. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 235–253

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson HW, Park JY, JE Moore II, Pan Q (2014) National economic impact analysis of terrorist and natural disasters. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler T (2003) Terrorism & game theory. Simulat Gaming 34(3):319–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler T, Lapan HE (1988) The calculus of dissent: an analysis of terrorists’ choice of targets. Synthese 76(2):245–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler T, Siqueira K (2006) Global terrorism: deterrence versus pre-emption. Can J Econ/Revue canadienne d’économique 39(4):1370–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler T, Siqueira K (2009) Games and terrorism recent developments. Simulat Gaming 40(2):164–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler T, Tschirhart JT, Cauley J (1983) A theoretical analysis of transnational terrorism. Am Polit Sci Rev 77(4):36–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan X, Zhuang J (2013) Cost of equity in homeland security resource allocation in the face of a strategic attacker. Risk Anal 33(6):1083–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas S (1996) Contest success functions. Econ Theor 7(2):283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirman J (2006) Immigration and insecurity: post-9/11 fear in the United States. MIT Center for International Studies Audit of the Conventional Wisdom, 06–09

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Bier VM (2011) Target-hardening decisions based on uncertain multiattribute terrorist utility. Decis Anal 8(4):286–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang J (2010) Impacts of subsidized security on stability and total social costs of equilibrium solutions in an n-player game with errors. Eng Economist 55(2):131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang J, Bier VM (2007) Balancing terrorism and natural disasters-defensive strategy with endogenous attacker effort. Oper Res 55(5):976–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang J, Bier VM (2011) Secrecy and deception at equilibrium, with applications to anti-terrorism resource allocation. Defence Peace Econ 22(1):43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JiYoung Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hwang, H., Park, J. (2019). The Game-Theoretic National Interstate Economic Model: Economically Optimizing U.S. Aviation Security Policies Against Terrorist Attacks. In: Okuyama, Y., Rose, A. (eds) Advances in Spatial and Economic Modeling of Disaster Impacts. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16237-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics