Skip to main content

Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research

Abstract

Thematic analysis (TA) is a popular and foundational method of analyzing qualitative policy data. It is concerned with the identification and analysis of patterns of meaning (themes) and constitutes a widely applicable, cost-effective and flexible tool for exploratory research. More generally, it constitutes a cornerstone of qualitative data analysis. Drawing principally on Braun and Clarke’s (2013, 2006) work, the chapter outlines when the use of this method is suitable and makes practical suggestions about how to plan and conduct TA research. Few policy studies employing TA contain a transparent discussion of research methods. This chapter stresses the importance of research transparency and methodological reflexivity: researchers should not only document what they do; they should also explicitly argue how and why they opted for specific methods and discuss implications for future empirical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birks, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2008). Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(1), 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomkamp, E. (2014). Uses of evidence in local cultural policy: Performance, legitimation, problem representation, and learning in two Australian municipalities. Evidence & Policy, 10(2), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 57–71). Washington, DC: APA Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2016). (Mis)conceptualising themes, thematic analysis, and other problems with Fugard and Potts’ (2015) sample-size tool for thematic analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(6), 739–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1947–1952). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, L. M., & Peltzer, J. N. (2016). Underdeveloped themes in qualitative research: Relationship with interviews and analysis. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 30(1), 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darchen, S., & Tremblay, D.-G. (2015). Policies for creative clusters: A comparison between the video game industries in Melbourne and Montreal. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, L., & Ugarriza, D. N. (2000). The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22(3), 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditchfield, H., & Meredith, J. (2018). Collecting qualitative data from Facebook: Approaches and methods. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 496–510). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Empson, L. (2018). Elite interviewing in professional organizations. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(1), 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugard, A., & Potts, H. (2015). Supporting thinking on sample sizes for thematic analyses: A quantitative tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(6), 669–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganter, S. A. (2017). Perception and articulation of own cultural otherness in elite interview situations: Challenge or repertoire. The Qualitative Report, 22(4), 942–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. R. (2013). Using software in qualitative analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 277–294). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewald, T. (2008). Memos and memoing. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 505–506). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, C. (2016). Vom öffentlich-rechtlichen Oligopol zum dualen Rundfunksystem: Die EinfĂĽhrung des Privatfernsehens aus akteurszentrierter Perspektive. In T. Birkner, M. Löblich, A. L. Tiews, & H.-U. Wagner (Eds.), Neue Vielfalt: Medienpluralität und –konkurrenz in historischer Perspektive (pp. 114–140). Köln: Herbert von Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, C., & Ali, C. (2015). Elite interviewing in media and communications policy research. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 11(1), 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, C., & Dias OsĂłrio, C. (2018). Information subsidies: Visions at stake in Portuguese copyright law reform. Paper presented at the International Communication Association’s (ICA) 68th Annual Conference, Prague, Communication Law & Policy Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, C., & Karppinen, K. (2014). Policy streams and public service media funding reforms in Germany and Finland. European Journal of Communication, 29(4), 416–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollifield, C. A., & Coffey, A. J. (2006). Qualitative research in media management and economics. In A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, & M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 573–600). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, H. (2012). Thematic analysis. In D. Harper & A. R. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 209–223). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, N., & Puppis, M. (2012). Communication policy research: Looking back, moving forward. In N. Just & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects (pp. 9–29). Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 257–270). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean, D. (2011). The evolution of GMCP institutions. In R. Mansell & M. Raboy (Eds.), The handbook of global media and communication policy (pp. 40–57). Chichester: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, O. T. (2011). A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, T., & Perry, B. (2013). Reflexivity and the practice of qualitative research. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 109–122). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 601–613). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, M. B., Rathi, D., Evaniew, J., & Wu, Y. (2017). Thematic analysis of eight Canadian federal broadband programs from 1994 to 2016. Journal of Information Policy, 7, 38–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, M. B., Rathi, D., Joseph, K., Evaniew, J., & Adkisson, A. (2018). Ongoing policy, regulatory, and competitive challenges facing Canada’s small internet service providers. Journal of Information Policy, 8, 167–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (2014). Transparency: The revolution in qualitative research. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(1), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. N., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potschka, C. (2012). Towards a market in broadcasting: Communications policy in the UK and Germany. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ruhode, E. (2016). E-government for development: A thematic analysis of Zimbabwe’s information and communication technology policy documents. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 73(7), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2017). Qualitative research: Analyzing life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M., & Leeman, J. (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1404–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, C., & Lewins, A. (2014). Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stover, C. M. (2010). Network neutrality: A thematic analysis of policy perspectives across the globe. Global Media Journal—Canadian Edition, 3(1), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, C. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 17–37). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Method for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulck, H. (2012). Towards a media policy process analysis model and its methodological implications. In N. Just & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in communication policy research: New theories, methods and subjects (pp. 217–231). Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (n.d.). Thematic analysis resource and information. Website: www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/thematicanalysis.

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. N., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, C. (2017). Thematic analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 17–37). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Herzog, C., Handke, C., Hitters, E. (2019). Analyzing Talk and Text II: Thematic Analysis. In: Van den Bulck, H., Puppis, M., Donders, K., Van Audenhove, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Methods for Media Policy Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics