Skip to main content

A Research Preview on TAICOS – Tailoring Stakeholder Interests to Task-Oriented Functional Requirements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11412))

Abstract

[Context and Motivation] Without a concrete functional context, non-functional requirements can be approached only as cross-cutting concerns and treated uniformly across the feature set of an application. This neglects, however, the heterogeneity of non-functional requirements that arises from stakeholder interests and the distinct functional scopes of software systems. [Question/problem] Earlier studies have shown that the different types and pursued objectives of non-functional requirements result in either vague or unbalanced specification of non-functional requirements. [Principal ideas/results] We propose a task analytic approach for eliciting and modeling user tasks with the software product. Stakeholder interests are structurally related to these user tasks and refined individually as a constraint in the context of each concrete user task. This individual refinement provides DevOps teams with important guidance on how the respective constraint can be satisfied in the software lifecycle and thus how the interest of the stakeholder can be satisfied sufficiently. [Contribution] We provide a structured approach, intertwining task-centered functional requirements with non-functional stakeholder interests to specify constraints on the level of user tasks. The results of a preliminary interview study with domain experts reveal that our task-constraint tailoring method increases the comprehensibility of requirements, clarity and quality of specifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Annett, J.: Hierarchical task analysis. In: The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 67–82. Taylor & Francis, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berander, P., Andrews, A.: Requirements prioritization. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (eds.) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, pp. 69–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28244-0_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Blaine, J.D., Cleland-Huang, J.: Software quality requirements: how to balance competing priorities. IEEE Softw. 25(2), 22–24 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourque, P., Fairley, R.E.: Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge, 3rd edn. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broy, M.: Rethinking nonfunctional software requirements. Computer 48(5), 96–99 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung, L., do Prado Leite, J.C.S.: On non-functional requirements in software engineering. In: Borgida, A.T., Chaudhri, V.K., Giorgini, P., Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 363–379. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Fotrousi, F., Fricker, S.A., Fiedler, M.: Quality requirements elicitation based on inquiry of quality-impact relationships. In: 2014 IEEE 22nd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), pp. 303–312 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gehmeyr, A., Höfler, W., Kochseder, R., Rettner, J., Horn, S.: Computer-implemented product development method, US Patent no. 15/661,498 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lamsweerde, A.V.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: Proceedings Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 249–262 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Regnell, B., Svensson, R.B., Olsson, T.: Supporting roadmapping of quality requirements. IEEE Softw. 25(2), 42–47 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Riegel, N., Doerr, J.: A systematic literature review of requirements prioritization criteria. In: Fricker, S.A., Schneider, K. (eds.) REFSQ 2015. LNCS, vol. 9013, pp. 300–317. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16101-3_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Rolland, C., Salinesi, C.: Modeling goals and reasoning with them. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (eds.) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, pp. 189–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28244-0_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Roman, G.C.: A taxonomy of current issues in requirements engineering. Computer 18(4), 14–23 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, H., Zheng, S., Chu, W.C.C., Tsai, C.T.: Linking functions and quality attributes for software evolution. In: 2012 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, vol. 1, pp. 250–259 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zowghi, D., Coulin, C.: Requirements Elicitation: A Survey of Techniques, Approaches, and Tools. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (eds.) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, pp. 19–46. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28244-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philipp Haindl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Haindl, P., Plösch, R., Körner, C. (2019). A Research Preview on TAICOS – Tailoring Stakeholder Interests to Task-Oriented Functional Requirements. In: Knauss, E., Goedicke, M. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11412. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15538-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15538-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15537-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15538-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics