Skip to main content

Advances in Bearing Surfaces of Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
General Principles of Orthopedics and Trauma

Abstract

Since the advent of the mass-produced THA in the 1950s there has been much innovation in bearing surfaces. HXLPE has reduced the wear rates and resultant osteolysis originally seen in the Charnley UHMWPE acetabular cup. Advances in ceramic have shown good midterm results with regard to reduced wear but are associated with a higher financial cost than polyethylene liners. Failures and disasters have shaped our understanding of the science behind wear as well as the way in which new materials are produced. Although MoM initially showed promise as a bearing surface, it has fallen out of favor because of its serious associated complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bellare A, Spector M. Total knee arthroplasty. In: Chapter 7: the polyethylene history. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paxton E, Inacio M, Namba R, Love R, Kurtz S. Metal on conventional polyethylene total hip arthroplasty bearing surfaces have a higher risk of revision than metal on highly cross-linked polyethylene: results from a US registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:1011–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man 15th Annual Report, 2018. The NJR Editorial Board. pp. 37–101.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nandi S. CORR insights: periprosthetic joint infection in hip arthroplasty: is there an association between infection and bearing surface type. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:2219.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Witvoet J, Nizard R, Sedel L. Ceramic on ceramic bearings. In: Interfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 143–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelsen-Freund E, Jacobs J, Maloney W. Ceramic bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. In: Arthroplasty. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Capello W, D’Anthonoio J, Feinberg J, Manley M. Alternative bearing surfaces for total hip arthroplasty. In: Bioceramics and alternative bearings in joint arthroplasty. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 87–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hernigou P, Zilber S, Filippini P, et al. Ceramic-ceramic bearing decreases osteolysis: a twenty year study versus ceramic-polyethylene on the contralateral hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:2274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Durst, A., Spacey, K., Khan, W.S. (2019). Advances in Bearing Surfaces of Total Hip Arthroplasty. In: Iyer, K., Khan, W. (eds) General Principles of Orthopedics and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15089-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15089-1_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15088-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15089-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics