Abstract
TCP is a well-known protocol used by many web applications. However, to address the shortcomings of TCP including connection setup time and congestion response time, Google developed QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connection). QUIC, a UDP based protocol which is similar to TCP + HTTP/2 + TLS has several advantages over modern TCP including highly reduced connection initiation time, improved congestion control and better connection migration. This paper explores how performance of TCP and QUIC is affected under different network and control parameters like bandwidth, added delay, packet loss, spikes and number of flows.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bakri, H., Allison, C., Miller, A., Oliver, I.: HTTP/2 and QUIC for virtual worlds and the 3D web? Procedia Comput. Sci. 56, 242–251 (2015)
Bouzas, S.: Why the meteoric rise of google quic is worrying mobile operators. https://2nuzlzatrf-flywheel.netdna-ssl.com/uploads/Chart-for-25Jan18-blog.jpg. Accessed 01 Dec 2018
Carlucci, G., De Cicco, L., Mascolo, S.: HTTP over UDP: an experimental investigation of QUIC. In: Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 609–614. ACM (2015)
Cook, S., Mathieu, B., Truong, P., Hamchaoui, I.: QUIC: better for what and for whom? In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2017) (2017)
De Coninck, Q., Bonaventure, O.: Multipath QUIC: design and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies, pp. 160–166. ACM (2017)
Google: Playing with QUIC. https://www.chromium.org/quic/playing-with-quic. Accessed 01 Dec 2018
Jain, R.: Fairness: how to measure quantitatively? ATMF/94-0881 (1994)
Langley, A., Riddoch, A., Wilk, A., Vicente, A., Krasic, C., Zhang, D., Yang, F., Kouranov, F., Swett, I., Iyengar, J., et al.: The quic transport protocol: design and internet-scale deployment. In: Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, pp. 183–196. ACM (2017)
Lin, F., Li, X., Li, W.: Research on TCP protocol in wireless network and network simulation. In: 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, WiCOM 2008, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2008)
Liu, X., Cheng, L., Bhargava, B., Zhao, Z.: Experimental study of TCP and UDP protocols for future distributed databases (1995)
Lychev, R., Jero, S., Boldyreva, A., Nita-Rotaru, C.: How secure and quick is quic? Provable security and performance analyses. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 214–231. IEEE (2015)
Megyesi, P., Krämer, Z., Molnár, S.: How quick is QUIC? In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saurabh, Prakash, S., Singh, P.K., Nandi, S.K., Nandi, S. (2019). Is QUIC Quicker Than TCP?. In: Barolli, L., Takizawa, M., Xhafa, F., Enokido, T. (eds) Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications. WAINA 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 927. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15035-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15035-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15034-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15035-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)