Skip to main content

The Importance of Analysis Cycles in Defining Criteria for Selecting Digital Era Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Industrial Engineering and Operations Management I (IJCIEOM 2018)

Abstract

The technological advances of the Digital Era can be a success depending on the quality of the data for decision making. There are many opportunities to invest in solutions for quality improvement. Many technologies promise to identify faults and even resolve them automatically. There is a gap in identifying the criteria that support decision making. It has been perceived the need to describe how the flow is for decision making of quality improvement projects and innovation within an automotive company. The purpose of this article is to examine and identify how an industry, which invests in high technology, is addressing the advances of these technological transformations. The applied methodological design is the explanatory research carried out in the form of a case study through the combination of document analysis, direct observations and semi-structured interviews. The contribution of this research highlights the importance of using criteria that best demonstrate the benefits, constraints and risks in the decision-making process for solving quality problems with the adoption of new technological resources. The main results indicate a convergence with the already existing data in the literature, considering, for example, the local culture. There is a need to consider other criteria to better inform decision-making in the adoption of technological artifacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berman, S.: Digital transformation: opportunities to create new business models. Strat. Leadersh. 40(2) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., Papakostas, N., Mourtzis, D., Michalos, G., Georgoulias, K.: Digital manufacturing: history, perspectives, and outlook. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sundar, R., Balajib, N., Satheesh Kumar, R.: A review on lean manufacturing implementation techniques. College of Engineering, Pottaplayam, Tamilnadu (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shah, R., Ward, P.: Defining and developing measures of lean production. J. Oper. Manag. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. McCahon, C., Rys, M., Ward, K.: The impact of training technique on the difficulty of quality improvement problem solving. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 96(7), 24–31 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moen, R., Norman, C.: Evolution of the PDCA cycle—Society, University of West Georgia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Werkema, C.: Lean Seis Sigma: Introdução às ferramentas do lean manufacturing. Rio de Janeiro, RJ (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Satolo, E., et al.: Análise da utilização de técnicas e ferramentas no programa Seis Sigma a partir de um levantamento tipo survey. Prod. 19(2), 400–416 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pacheco, D.: Teoria das Restrições, Lean Manufacturing e Seis Sigma: limites e possibilidades de integração, UFRGS, Rio Grande do Sul (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ray, S., Das, P.: Six Sigma project selection methodology. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 1(4), 293–309 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hagemeyer, C., Gershenson, J., Johnson, D.: Classification and application of problem solving quality tools: a manufacturing case study. TQM Mag. 18 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vargas, R.: Utilizando a programação multicritério (analytic hierarchy process—ahp) para selecionar e priorizar projetos na gestão de portfólio. In: PMI Global Congress, North America (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Noro, G.: Tomada de decisão em Gestão de Projetos: um estudo realizado no setor de construção civil. Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Padovani, M., Muscata, A., Camanho, R., Carvalho, M.: Looking for the right criteria to define projects portfolio: multiple case study analysis. University of São Paulo, SP (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mourão, Y., Gomes, F.: Priorização de Projetos de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento na Indústria do Petróleo: Uma Aplicação Da Teoria Dos Prospectos, Rio de Janeiro (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas: ABNT NBR ISO 9001:2015—Sistemas de gestão da qualidade—Requisitos. Rio de Janeiro (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. International Organization for Standardization (n.d.)—ISO 9000 family—Quality management. https://www.iso.org/iso-9001-quality-management.html. Accessed 9 March 2018

  18. Nakane, J., Hall, R.: Ohno’s method creating a survival work culture. AME—Association for Manufacturing Excellence, 380 West Palatine Road (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dinh, T., Barbara, I., Tritos, L.: The impact of total quality management on innovation: findings from a developing country. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 23(9), 1092–1117 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thiagarajan, T., e Zairi, M.: A review of total quality management in practice: understanding the fundamentals through examples of best practice applications—Part I. TQM Mag. 9(4), 270–286 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Production and Systems Engineering Research Group (PPGEPS) about Industry 4.0 from PUC-PR, Araucaria Foundation for Science and Technology/FA-PR under Grant 40/2017 and Renault of Brazil

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cassiano Souza Beller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Beller, C.S., Ramos, L.F.P., de Freitas Rocha Loures, E., Deschamps, F. (2019). The Importance of Analysis Cycles in Defining Criteria for Selecting Digital Era Projects. In: Reis, J., Pinelas, S., Melão, N. (eds) Industrial Engineering and Operations Management I. IJCIEOM 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 280. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14969-7_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics