Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Data Quality for Healthcare: The Risk Management Tools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Risk Management, Volume I

  • 1024 Accesses

Abstract

It’s a study at the beginning that aims to use tools typical of accountability (accounting, extra-accounting data related to the efficacy and efficiency of business management) that take to the reduction of the risk management and to better treatment of patients in healthcare companies. The purpose of this study is to create the premises for the planning of collecting and reporting data systems useful to all stakeholders (external and internal to the service), through the identification and the organization of accounting data for local public services through the qualitative method of the case studies methodology. The study allows data identification and mapping; moreover, the study offers an applicable methodology to evaluate the efficiency of the service on the territory, combining clinical and ethical with economic aspects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abdallah, A. B. (2013). The influence of “soft” and “hard” Total Quality Management (TQM) practices on Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) in Jordanian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Business and Management. Recuperato da http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/29282.

  • Agrawal, N. (2018). Disaster risk management. In Natural disasters and risk management in Canada (pp. 81–145). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1283-3_3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Akkizidis, I., & Khandelwal, S. (2007). Financial risk management for Islamic banking and finance. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allais, M. (2008). Allais paradox. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., & Mininno, V. (2007). Risk management in ERP project introduction: Review of the literature. Information & Management, 44(6), 547–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. A., Waterhouse, J. H., & Wells, R. B. (1997). A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avanesov, E. (2009). Risk management in ISO 9000 series standards. International conference on risk assessment and management (Vol. 24, p. 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barretta, A. (2004). L’unità nella diversità: la “dimensione sovraziendale” del controllo di gestione nelle aziende sanitarie. Rome: Cedam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. S., Clune, R., & Hermanson, D. R. (2005). Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(6), 521–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergamin Barbato, M. (1991). Programmazione e Controllo in un’Ottica Strategica (Planning and control in a strategic perspective) (pp. 1–57). Turin, Italy: UTET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghesi, A., & Panati, G. (1985). La gestione dei rischi d’azienda: economia e organizzazione, teoria e pratica. Cedam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, C. (2017). Supply chain risk. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusa, L. (2000). Sistemi manageriali di programmazione e controllo. Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D., & Barbat, A. H. (2007). A disaster risk management performance index. Natural Hazards, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9008-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., Wiseman, R. M., Fiegenbaum, A., & Devers, C. E. (2003). Integrating behavioural and economic concepts of risk into strategic management: The twain shall meet. Long Range Planning, 36(1), 61–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, C. J., & Varma, S. (1999). Strategic risk management: The new competitive edge. Long Range Planning, 32(4), 414–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockford, N. (1986). An introduction to risk management. Cambridge: Woodhead-Faulkner. 0-85941-332-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, A. R. (2012). Supply chain management dimensions, supply chain performance and organizational performance: An integrated framework. International Journal of Business and Management. Recuperato da http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/14119/10934.

  • Druta, T., Casati, G., & Fraternali, P. (2013, ottobre 2). Managing human generated content for multimedia annotation. Recuperato da https://www.politesi.polimi.it/handle/10589/82281.

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, C., & Marle, F. (2012). A simulation-based risk network model for decision support in project risk management. Decision Support Systems, 52(3), 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H., & Peaucelle, J. L. (2000). Administration industrielle et générale: 3e partie: observations et expériences personnelles. Université Paris I, Panthéon-Sorbonne, Institut d’administration des entreprises.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestieri, G. (1996). Risk management. Strumenti e politiche per la gestione dei rischi puri dell’impresa. Milano: Egea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, P. K., Martin, L. A., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Mechler, R., Pflug, G., & Warner, K. (2003). Disaster risk management (97 pp.). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, Sustainable Development Department, Environment Division, Integration and Regional Programs Department, Regional Policy Dialogue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Rusconi, G., & Dorigatti, M. (2007). Teoria degli stakeholder (Vol. 7). Milano: Franco Angeli. Recuperato da https://aisberg.unibg.it/handle/10446/21055#.Wqj9_S4q6-4.mendeley.

  • Gahin, F. S. (1967). A theory of pure risk management in the business firm. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 34(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/251020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garatwa, W. (2002). Disaster risk management: Working concept. German Technical Cooperation (GTZ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, P. R. (2008). Analytical methods for risk management: A systems engineering perspective. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420011395.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hejdukova, P. (2016). Healthcare systems in Austria and the Czech Republic? The same history, but with some differences. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(4), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. A. (2004). Defining risk. Financial Analysts Journal, 60, 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2000). Value at risk. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2007). Financial risk manager handbook (Vol. 406). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner, U., Peck, H., & Christopher, M. (2003). Supply chain risk management: Outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 6(4), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560310001627016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. Y. S. (2008). Supply chain risk management. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 1(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.704/IJIDS.2008.02005.

  • Leitch, M. (2010). ISO 31000: 2009—The new international standard on risk management. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30(6), 887–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T., & Skitmore, M. (2004). Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry: A survey. International Journal of Project Management, 22(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00005-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T., & Reniers, G. (2016). Engineering risk management. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K. D. (1992). A framework for integrated risk management in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2), 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morosini, P., Di Stanislao, F., Casati, G., & Panella, M. (2005). Qualità professionale e percorsi assistenziali. I manuali di formazione per la valutazione e il miglioramento della qualità professionale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paté-Cornell, M. E. (1990). Organizational aspects of engineering system safety: The case of offshore platforms. Science, 250(4985), 1210–1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.250.4985.1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paté-Cornell, M. E. (1996). Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 54(2–3), 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petroni, A. (1996). Il risk management nelle piccole e medie imprese. Rome: Cedam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puddu, L. (2001). Ragioneria Pubblica. Il bilancio degli enti locali. Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puddu, L. (2006). Enti strumentali regionali e loro accountability. Il caso Piemonte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puddu, L., Rainero, C., Secinaro, S., Indelicato, A., & Vietti, M. C. (2013). The consolidated financial statement: Are Ipsas and national accounting standards comparable? The Turin City council case. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(13), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, G. (2010). ISO 31000: 2009—Setting a new standard for risk management. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30(6), 881–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls III, S. W., & Smithson, C. W. (1990). Strategic risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2(4), 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, T., & Michael, E. (2001). Use and benefits of tools for project risk management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00036-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J. (1997). Risk assessment and clinical risk management: The lessons from recent inquiries. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 170(S32), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1192/S0007125000298644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regione Piemonte. (2018, ottobre 7). Sistema Piemontese Informatizzazione Dipendenze - Sistemapiemonte. Recuperato da http://www.sistemapiemonte.it/cms/pa/sanita/servizi/252-spidi-sistema-piemontese-informatizzazione-dipendenze.

  • Riccaboni, A. (2003). Controllo di gestione e comportamenti individuali. In G. Donna & A. Riccaboni (a cura di). Manuale del controllo di gestione. Analisi dei costi, budget, reporting, ERP, balanced scorecard: applicazioni e soluzioni innovative. IPSOA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A., Wallace, W., & McClure, N. (2003). Strategic risk management. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. X. (1996). Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review, 40(6), 1325–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00029-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. W., Smithson, C., & Wilford, D. S. (1990). Strategic risk management. Institutional Investor Series in Finance. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, P. (1997). Practical aspects of clinical risk assessment and management. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 170(S32), 32–34. https://doi.org/10.1192/S0007125000298711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, S. C. (2000). Daniel Bernoulli (1738): Evolution and economics under risk. Journal of Biosciences, 25(3), 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatano, H. (2003). Major characteristics of disaster risk and its management strategies. Sociotechnica, 1, 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, F. (2012). Health is wealth: Considerations to European healthcare. Prilozi, 33(1), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbano, C., & Venturini, K. (2011). Development paths of risk management: Approaches, methods and fields of application. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 519–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C., Taylor-Adams, S., Chapman, E. J., Hewett, D., Prior, S., Strange, P., & Tizzard, A. (2000). How to investigate and analyse clinical incidents: Clinical risk unit and association of litigation and risk management protocol. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 320(7237), 777–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walshe, K. (2000). Adverse events in health care: Issues in measurement. BMJ Quality & Safety, 9(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.9.1.47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S., & Chapman, C. (2003). Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management, 21(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yodomani, S. (2001). Disaster risk management and vulnerability …, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangrandi, A. (1999). Amministrazione delle aziende sanitarie pubbliche: aspetti di gestione, organizzazione e misurazioni economiche (Vol. 18). Milano: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Paolo Pietro Biancone, Andrea Martra, Silvana Secinaro & Daniel Iannaci

Authors
  1. Paolo Pietro Biancone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Martra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Silvana Secinaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Iannaci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Pietro Biancone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Paola De Vincentiis

  2. Department of Management, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Francesca Culasso

  3. Department of Management, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Stefano A. Cerrato

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Biancone, P.P., Martra, A., Secinaro, S., Iannaci, D. (2019). The Data Quality for Healthcare: The Risk Management Tools. In: De Vincentiis, P., Culasso, F., Cerrato, S.A. (eds) The Future of Risk Management, Volume I. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14548-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14548-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14547-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14548-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation