Abstract
A variety of forms of basic income (BI) have been proposed, including universal payments, guaranteed minimum incomes and negative income taxes. The relative merits of these proposals have been the subject of some debate. Much of the confusion surrounding the issue can be resolved by the observation that, in terms of their effect on the final distribution of income, after taxes and transfers, all three are equivalent, in the sense that any distribution arising from a universal payment can be replicated by a guaranteed minimum income or negative income tax. Despite this equivalence, the proposals imply different paths from the current situation to a BI, and therefore different political strategies. In this chapter, it is argued that a ‘basic first’ approach beginning with a guaranteed minimum income is the most likely to yield a feasible path to a BI and to raise crucial political challenges to the existing system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The objective states ‘The Australian Labor Partyis a democratic socialist party and has the objective of the democratic socialisation of industry, production, distribution and exchange, to the extent necessary to eliminate exploitation and other anti-social features in these fields’, and is followed by a list of principles associate with this objective. Even when disregarded in practice by the ALP, the Objective provides a point around which advocates of radical social change can rally’.
References
Brooks, J. (2017, April 12). Alaska House votes to lower permanent fund dividend. Juneau Empire. Retrieved from https://www.juneauempire.com/news/alaska-house-votes-to-lower-permanent-fund-dividend/
FitzRoy, F., & Jin, J. (2018). Basic income and a public job offer: Complementary policies to reduce poverty and unemployment. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 26, 191. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982718X15200701225179.
Henderson, T., & Quiggin, J. (2019). Trade unions and basic income. In M. Torry (Ed.), Palgrave international handbook of basic income. Melbourne, VIC: Melbourne University Press.
Kalecki, M. (1943). Political aspects of full employment. The Political Quarterly, 14(4), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1943.tb01016.x.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate – The essential guide for progressives. New York: Chelsea Green.
Quiggin, J. (2018). Labour market policy and the future of work. In P. Saunders (Ed.), Social security reform: Revisiting Henderson and basic income in Australia. Melbourne, VIC: Melbourne University Press.
Widerquist, K. (2015). Alaska, USA: 2015 dividend estimated to be near highest ever. Basic Income Earth Network. Retrieved from http://basicincome.org/news/2015/08/alaska-usa-dividend-amount-estimated-to-be-near-highest-ever/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quiggin, J. (2019). Basic or Universal? Pathways for a Universal Basic Income. In: Klein, E., Mays, J., Dunlop, T. (eds) Implementing a Basic Income in Australia. Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14378-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14378-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14377-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14378-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)