Skip to main content

All in the Head? A Feminist Critique of Subjective Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Desisting Sisters

Part of the book series: Critical Criminological Perspectives ((CCRP))

  • 798 Accesses

Abstract

In patriarchal society where women’s equality is not forthcoming, women are stigmatised on a daily basis for deviating from socially constructed gender norms when they resist or fail in their roles as mothers, daughters and partners. Furthermore, it is noted that stigma occurs when a person does not conform to desired socially constructed roles. When women are seen as offenders, not only have many of them resisted gender norms but they have also violated moral and legal norms. Ideas around identity change (particularly surrounding women’s relational identities) are also explored in this chapter. Criminalised women are often constructed as falling within the offender/victim/survivor trichotomy. This chapter will contend that this is problematic. When women self-identify as offenders or ex-offenders, this can result in either a self-fulfilling prophecy or a positive move towards desistance, depending on the availability of alternative meaning structures. When women are socially identified as offenders, the result tends to be the former. Yet when women are constructed solely as victims, their agency disappears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more on Katie and Heathers’ experiences see the next chapter.

  2. 2.

    Heather’s sister attempted suicide the weekend prior to our interview whilst she was staying at Heather’s house.

  3. 3.

    Macmillan Cancer Support who provide support and advice for individuals who have cancer in prison.

  4. 4.

    It is worth remembering that Heather in particular denied any awareness that ‘ticking the wrong box’ was morally or legally ‘wrong’.

  5. 5.

    During the first interview, Julie had mentioned a statement from the council in the local press and advised me to look this up. Upon doing so, I came across another article which suggested Julie’s involvement in an arson attack in 1999. The article suggested Julie had set fire to the car of the boyfriend of a teenage girl she had become ‘obsessed with’ through some voluntary work. The article also suggested Julie had mental health issues and problems with alcohol. When I brought the incident up, Julie accepted this was herself. ‘I still to this day do not remember. I underwent treatment at X rehab centre and it was apparently an attempt on somebody’s car. But I … I don’t know, I was told I was lucky that I hadn’t killed myself.’ This revelation also indicated that Julie was becoming more comfortable with our relationship and the trust between us had grown. Julie’s story also indicated the importance of multiple meetings as part of a research methodology.

Bibliography

  • Aresti, A., Eatough, V., & Brooks-Gordan, B. (2010). Doing Time After Time: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Reformed Ex-Prisoners’ Experiences of Self-change, Identity and Career Opportunities. Psychology Crime and Law, 16(3), 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A., & Shapland, J. (2011). Steps Toward Desistance Among Male Young Adult Recidivists. In S. Farrall, M. Hough, S. Maruna, & R. Sparks (Eds.), Escape Routes: Contemporary Perspectives on Life After Punishment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A., Shapland, J., Costello, A., Holmes, D., & Muir, G. (2004). Towards Desistance: Theoretical Underpinnings for an Empirical Study. The Howard Journal, 43(4), 368–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, R., & Maruna, S. (2004). So Prison Works, Does It? The Criminal Careers of 130 Men Released from Prison under Home Secretary, Michael Howard. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43, 390–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, C. (2012). Processes of Intermittency in Criminal Careers: Notes from a Swedish Study on Life Courses and Crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(8), 913–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1986). The Ideal Victim. In E. Fattah (Ed.), From Crime Policy to Victim Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (2004). A Suitable Amount of Crime. Abingdon: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, B., & Chadwick, K. (2018). From ‘Troubled’ Women to Failing Institutions: Necessary Narrative Shifts in Decarceration of Women Post-Corston. In L. Moore, P. Scraton, & A. Wahidin (Eds.), Women’s Imprisonment and the Case for Abolition: Critical Reflections on Corston Ten Years On. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (2011). Gender, Crime and Victimisation. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, K. (2011). Unruly Women: The Politics of Confinement and Resistance. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S. (2002). Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S., & Calverley, A. (2006). Understanding Desistance from Crime (Crime and Justice Series). London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. (2006). Neither Angels nor Demons: Women, Crime, and Victimization. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P. C., Cernokovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, Crime and Desistance: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1968). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, E. L. (2017). Prisoners Post-Release, The Need for a Critical Desistance. In E. L. Hart & F. J. C. Van Ginneken (Eds.), New Perspectives on Desistance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heidensohn, F., & Silvestri, M. (2012). Gender and Crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (pp. 336–369).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J., McIvor, G., & Murray, C. (1999). Understanding Offending Amongst Young People. Edinburgh: The Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. (2004). Beyond Belief? Police, Rape and Women’s Credibility. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 4(1), 29–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of Crime: Moral and Sensual Attractions in Doing Evil. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, H. (1993). Eve Was Framed: Women and British Justice. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The “Chicken and Egg” of Subjective and Social Factors in Desistance from Crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(11), 131–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leverentz, A. (2014). The Ex-Prisoner’s Dilemma: How Women Negotiate Competing Narratives of Re-entry and Desistance. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1962). The Savage Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A. (1995). Doubly Deviant, Doubly Damned: Society’s Treatment of Violent Women. London: Penguin Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good – How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. P. (2003). Welcome Home? Examining the “Re-entry Court” Concept from a Strength Based Perspective. Western Criminology Review, 4, 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L., & Heimer, K. (1997). ‘A Symbolic Interactionist Theory of Role Transitions’, Role Commitments. In T. P. Thonberry (Ed.), Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 7, Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R., Easton, H., Reynolds, L., Bindel, J., & Young, L. (2014). Exiting Prostitution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D., & Sykes, G. M. (1957). Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, H. (2015). Addressing Violence Against Women Beyond Criminal Justice. In H. Mills, R. Roberts, & L. Townhead (Eds.), Empower, Resist, Transform: A Collection of Essays (pp. 7–9). London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, D. (2017). Film as a Radical Pedagogic Tool. New York/London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. (2013). ‘She’s Alpha Male’: Transgressive Gender Performances in the Probation ‘Classroom’. Gender and Education, 25(4), 396–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prison Reform Trust. (2017). Why Focus on Reducing Women’s Imprisonment? London: Prison Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probyn, E. (2005). Blush: Faces of Shame. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, P., & Hunter, G. (2013). The Development and Impact of Community Services for Women Offenders: An Evaluation. London: The Institute for Criminal Policy Research, School of Law, Birkbeck College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1996). Of Woman Born – Motherhood as Experience and Institution (3rd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2015). ‘It Was Do or Die’ – How a Woman’s Experience of Domestic Abuse Can Influence Her Involvement in Crime: A Qualitative Investigation of the Experiences of Community-Based Female Offenders. Doctoral Thesis, University of Leicester, Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumgay, J. (2004). Scripts for Safer Survival: Pathways Out of Female Crime. The Howard Journal, 43(4), 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. (1977). Women, Crime and Criminology: A Feminist Critique. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J., & Tolmie, J. (2008). Battered Women Charged with Homicide: Advancing the Interests of Indigenous Women. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41, 131–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C., Manza, J., & Behrens, A. (2004). Less Than the Average Citizen: Stigma, Role Transition and the Civic Reintegration of Convicted Felons. In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration (pp. 261–294). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. (2007). Handbook of Victims and Victimology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, A. (1990). Offending Women: Female Lawbreakers and the CJS. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Úna Barr .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barr, Ú. (2019). All in the Head? A Feminist Critique of Subjective Theory. In: Desisting Sisters. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14276-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14276-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14275-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14276-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics