Abstract
Human development is a development paradigm that puts people at the center of development—as its principle end and means. Human development is built on the theoretical concepts of capabilities originated by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, which provides a normative framework for assessment of individual well-being, social outcomes and public policies. In systematically and consistently applying the capability approach in empirical evaluation of development progress, and in the analysis of policy alternatives, the human development paradigm challenges standard prescriptions in a broad range of areas including social, macroeconomic, political, environmental and cultural arenas. It is often misinterpreted as an agenda for social welfare programs and social investments. The rich and complex concept of human development is imprisoned in its reductionist measurement tool, the Human Development Index that only includes education, income, and a decent standard of living. This chapter provides an overview of the capability approach and human development paradigm and situates them within development economics, thought and practice, highlighting its contrasts with conventional thinking, and complementarities with human rights and feminist economics. It argues that the capability approach and human development paradigm have had enormous reach and influence in development thought and practice. It has strengthened complementary approaches that are also motivated by human freedom and flourishing, notably human rights and feminist economics. All these paradigms have led to the rise of a ‘people centered’ approach to development as a discourse, and the consensus on poverty as a principle objective of development as reflected in the Sustainable Development Goals. However, the concepts of capabilities and human development have only been partially reflected in these discourses about policy agendas given the misrepresentation of human development as an agenda for meeting basic needs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
‘Capability’ and ‘capabilities’ are both used widely in the literature. While Sen uses the singular form to refer to a set of capabilities, Nussbaum prefers the plural ‘in order to emphasize that the most important elements of people’s quality of life are plural and qualitatively distinct: health, bodily integrity, education, and other aspects of individual lives cannot be reduced to a single metric without distortion’ (Nussbaum 2011, p. 18). See Robeyns (2017) for a discussion of these and other differences.
- 2.
Sen describes ‘fasting’ as exemplifying a ‘refined functioning’, which is different from the ‘unrefined functioning’ of ‘starvation’—the latter not reflecting a matter of choice (1989, p. 49). He introduces the concept of ‘refined functioning achievements’ in his Dewey lectures and uses it alongside that of ‘capability sets of primitive functionings’—both noting the choices exercised given relevant alternatives available (Sen 1985b, p. 202).
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
This has been a common theme in feminist advocacy positions in international negotiations, especially in UN fora. See, for example, publications of the South-based feminist network: Development Alternatives for Women in a New Era (DAWN): http://dawnnet.org/resources/publications/ accessed 09.20.2018.
References
Agarwal, B., Humphries, J., & Robeyns, I. (2006). Capabilities, freedom and equality: Amartya Sen’s work from a gender perspective. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S. (2005). Why the capability approach? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 6(1), 115–133.
Alkire, S. (2010). Human development: Definitions, critiques and related concepts (Research paper 2010/01). New York: UNDP Human Development Report Office.
Alkire, S. (2016). The capability approach. In M. D. Adler & M. Fleurbaey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of wellbeing and public policy (pp. 615–644). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alkire, S., & Deneulin, S. (2009). The human development and capability approach. In S. Deneulin & L. Shahani (Eds.), An introduction to the human development and capability approach: Freedom and agency (pp. 22–48). London: Earthscan.
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 476–487.
Alkire, S., Foster, J., Seth, S., Santos, E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337.
Basu, K., & López-Calva, L. (2011). Functionings and capabilities. In A. Kenneth, A. Sen, & K. Suzumura (Eds.), Handbook of social choice and welfare (pp. 153–187). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
Biggeri, M., Ballet, J., & Comim, F. (2011). Children and the capability approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 1(1), 25–49.
Burchardt, T., & Hick, R. (2018). Inequality, advantage and the capability approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 19(1), 38–52.
Burchardt, T., & Vizard, P. (2014). Using the capability approach to evaluate health and care for individuals and groups in England. In S. Ibrahim & M. Tiwari (Eds.), The capability approach: From theory to practice (pp. 148–170). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chiappero-Martinetti, E., & Sabadash, A. (2014). Integrating human capital and human capabilities in understanding the value of education. In S. Ibrahim & M. Tiwari (Eds.), The capability approach: From theory to practice (pp. 206–230). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Claassen, R. (2009). Institutional pluralism and the limits of the market. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 8(4), 420–447.
Coast, J., Smith, R. D., & Lorgelly, P. (2008). Welfarism, extra-welfarism and capability: The spread of ideas in health economics. Social Science and Medicine, 67(7), 1190–1198.
Cornia, G. A., Jolly, R., & Stewart, F. (1987). Adjustment with a human face: Protecting the vulnerable and promoting growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Crocker, D. (2008). Ethics of global development: Agency, capability and deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutler, D., Deaton, A., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2006). The determinants of mortality. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(3), 97–120.
Deaton, A. (2007). Global patterns of income and health: Facts, interpretations, and policies. WIDER annual lecture 10, Helsinki.
Deneulin, S., & Shahani, L. (2009). An introduction to the human development and capability approach: Freedom and agency. London: Earthscan.
Evans, P. (2002). Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’s development as freedom. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), 54–60.
Ferber, M., & Nelson, J. (Eds.). (1993). Beyond economic man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Floro, M. S. (2016). Feminist approaches to development. In E. Reinert (Ed.), Handbook of alternative theories of economic Development (pp. 416–440). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Folbre, N. (2001). The invisible heart: Economics and family values. New York: The New Press.
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003a). Rescuing human development from the human development index. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. K. Shivakumar (Eds.), Readings in human development (pp. 117–126). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003b). The human development paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s ideas on capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), 301–317.
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2009). Human rights and human development. In K. Basu & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Arguments for a better world. Essays in honor of Amartya Sen. Volume II: Society, institutions, and development (pp. 76–79). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fukuda-Parr, S. (2017). Millennium development goals: Ideas, interests and influence. Abingdon: Routledge.
Fukuda-Parr, S., & Shiva Kumar, A. K. (2009). Handbook of human development: Concepts, measures, and policies. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Fukuda-Parr, S., Yamin, A. E., & Greenstein, J. (2014). The power of numbers: A critical review of millennium development goal targets for human development and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(2–3), 105–117.
Hamilton, D., & Darity, W. J. (2017). The political economy of education, financial literacy, and the racial wealth gap. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 99(1), 59–76.
Haq, M. (1976). The poverty curtain: Choices for the third world. New York: Columbia University Press.
Haq, M. (1995). Reflections on human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hirschman, A. O. (1981). Essays in trespassing: Economics to politics and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holland, B. (2014). Allocating the earth: A distributive framework for protecting capabilities in environmental law and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ibrahim, S. (2006). From individual to collective capabilities: The capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 397–416.
Ibrahim, S., & Tiwari, M. (2014). The capability approach: From theory to practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kuklys, W. (2005). Amartya Sen’s capability approach: Theoretical insights and empirical applications. Berlin: Springer.
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.
Merry, S. E. (2016). Seductions of quantification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Minujin, A., Vandemoortele, J., & Delamonica, E. (2002). Economic growth, poverty and children. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 23–43.
Nussbaum, M. (1988). Nature, functioning and capability: Aristotle on political distribution. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 1, 145–154.
Nussbaum, M. (1992). Human functioning and social justice: In defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory, 20(2), 202–246.
Nussbaum, M. (1995). Human capabilities, female human beings. In M. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), Women, culture and development (pp. 9–30). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nussbaum, M. (1997). Capabilities and human rights. Fordham Law Review, 66(2), 273–300.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), 33–59.
Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Panzironi, F. (2009). The right to self-determination of indigenous peoples interpreted through the capability framework. In E. Chiappero-Martinetti (Ed.), Debating global society: Reach and limits of the capability approach (pp. 301–336). Milan: Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli.
Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers. Pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Raworth, K. (2018a). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House Business.
Raworth, K. (2018b, September 16). Personal email communication with Fukuda-Parr.
Razavi, S. (1996). Excess female mortality: An indicator or female insubordination? A note drawing on village-level evidence from South Eastern Iran. Politeia, 12(43–44), 79–96.
Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 61–92.
Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach, a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.
Robeyns, I. (2009). The capability approach. In J. Peil & I. Van Staveren (Eds.), The handbook of ethics and economics (pp. 39–46). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Robeyns, I. (2016). Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 397–414.
Robeyns, I. (2017). Well being, freedom and justice: The capability approach re-examined. Cambridge: Open Book Publisher.
Rosenstein-Rodan, P. N. (1943). Problems of industrialisation of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The Journal of Economics, 53(210/211), 202–211.
Ruger, J. P., & Mitra, S. (2015). Health, disability and the capability approach: An introduction. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 16(4), 473–482.
Saith, A. (2006). From universal values to millennium development goals: Lost in translation. Development and Change, 37(6), 1167–1199.
Schlosberg, D. (2012). Climate justice and capabilities: A framework for adaptation policy. Ethics and International Affairs, 26(4), 445–461.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
Sen, A. K. (1980). Equality of what? In S. M. McMurrin (Ed.), Tanner lectures on human values (Vol. 1, pp. 195–220). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Sen, A. (1982). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1983a). Development: Which way now? The Economic Journal, 93(372), 745–762.
Sen, A. (1983b). Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35(2), 153–168.
Sen, A. (1985a). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sen, A. (1985b). Wellbeing, agency, and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.
Sen, A. (1987). The standard of living. London: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1988). The concept of development. In H. Chenery & T. N. Srinivason (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 1, pp. 9–26). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Sen, A. (1989). Development as capabilities expansion. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 41–58.
Sen, A. (1990). Gender and cooperative conflicts. In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent inequalities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (1993a). Market and freedoms: Achievements and limits of the market mechanism in promoting individual freedom. Oxford Economic Papers, 45(4), 519–541.
Sen, A. (1993b). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (1998). Mortality as an indicator of economic success and failure. The Economic Journal, 108(446), 1–25.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.
Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.
Sen, A. (2003). Foreword. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. K. S. Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development (pp. vii–xiii). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (2004). Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4), 315–352.
Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166.
Sen, A. (2007). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York: W.W. Norton.
Sen, A. (2009). Idea of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. (2013). The ends and means of sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 6–20.
Sen, A., & Williams, B. (1982). Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stewart, F. (2005). Groups and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 185–204.
Stewart, F. (2009). Horizontal inequality: Two types of trap. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(3), 315–340.
Stewart, F., Ranis, G., & Samman, E. (2018). Advancing human development: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Streeten, P., Burki, S., Haq, M. u., Hicks, N., & Stewart, F. (1981). First things first: Meeting basic human needs in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Syrquin, M. (1988). Patterns of structural change. In H. Chenery & T. N. Srinivason (Eds.), Handbook of development economics (Vol. 1, pp. 203–268). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2016). The state of the world’s children 2016: A fair chance for every child. New York: UNICEF.
United Nations Development Programme. (1990). Human development report 1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Human development report 1997. New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme. (2000). Human development report 2000. New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme. (2001). Human development report 2001: New technologies for human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
United Nations Development Programme. (2010). Human development report: The real wealth of nations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Venkatapuram, S. (2011). Health justice: An argument from the capability approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Vizard, P. (2006). Poverty and human rights: Sen’s ‘capability perspective’ explored. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vizard, P., Fukuda-Parr, S., & Elson, D. (2011). Introduction: The capability approach and human rights. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(1), 1–22.
Walker, J., Berekashvili, N., & Lomidze, N. (2014). Valuing time: Time use survey, the capability approach, and gender analysis. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(1), 47–59.
Wolff, J., & de-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantaged. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fukuda-Parr, S., Cid-Martinez, I. (2019). Capability Approach and Human Development. In: Nissanke, M., Ocampo, J.A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Development Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14000-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-13999-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14000-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)