Abstract
In this chapter, the authors provide a succinct overview of harmonic power filter planning studies, including causes and malicious effects of nonlinear loads and detailed descriptions of passive and active harmonic power filters. Next, different methodologies for solving harmonic power flow problems are precisely classified. Besides these outlines, the chapter develops the formulation of an innovative techno-economic multi-objective framework for the hybrid harmonic power filter (HHPF) planning problem in distribution networks, with consideration of uncertainty in demand and harmonic currents injected by nonlinear loads. The proposed framework is also broken down into a harmonic power flow problem and the HHPF planning problem. The harmonic power flow problem acts as a central core of the HHPF planning problem and is solved via a probabilistic decoupled harmonic power flow (PDHPF) methodology. This chapter widely utilizes an efficient two-point estimate method (two-PEM) in order to handle uncertainty in demand and harmonic currents injected by nonlinear loads in the proposed framework. The proposed PDHPF methodology, according to the efficient two-PEM, is implemented by a deterministic decoupled harmonic power flow (DDHPF) methodology. A loadability-based Newton-Raphson power flow (LBNRPF) methodology is also applied to solve the power flow problem at the principal frequency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
P. Caramia, G. Carpinelli, P. Verde, Power Quality Indices in Liberalized Markets (Wiley, Oxford, 2009)
IEEE 1159 (1995) recommended practice for monitoring electric power quality, November
T.D.C. Busarello, J.A. Pomilio, M.G. Simões, Passive filter aided by shunt compensators based on the conservative power theory. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 52(4), 3340–3347 (2016)
L. Morán, D. Dixon, M. Torres, Active power filters, in Power Electronics Handbook, 4th edn., (2018), pp. 1341–1379
S. Ostroznik, P. Bajec, P. Zajec, A study of a hybrid filter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 57(3), 935–942 (2010)
Y. Baghzouz et al., Time-varying harmonics: Part I–Characterizing measured data. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 13(3), 938–944 (1998)
Y. Baghzouz et al., Time-varying harmonics: Part II–Harmonic summation and propagation. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 17(1), 279–285 (2002)
E.F. Fuchs, M.A.S. Masoum, Power Quality in Power Systems and Electrical Machines (Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, 2008)
J. Arrillaga, B.C. Smith, Power System Harmonic Analysis (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1997)
J.C. Das, Passive filters—potentialities and limitations. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 40(1), 232–241 (2004)
L.B.G. Campanhol, S.A.O. da Silva, A. Goedtel, Application of shunt active power filter for harmonic reduction and reactive power compensation in three-phase four-wire systems. IET Power Electron. 7(11), 2825–2836 (2014)
D. Xia, G.T. Heydt, Harmonic power flow studies Part I—Formulation and solution. IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst. 101(6), 1257–1265 (1982)
D. Xia, G.T. Heydt, Harmonic power flow studies—Part II implementation and practical application. IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst. 101(6), 1266–1270 (1982)
H.C. Chin, Optimal shunt capacitor allocation by fuzzy dynamic programming. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 35(2), 133–139 (1995)
J.H. Teng, C.Y. Chang, A fast harmonic load flow method for industrial distribution systems, in International Conference on Power System Technology, vol. 3 (2000), pp. 1149–1154
I.M. Elamin, Fast decoupled harmonic load flow method, in Conference Record of the 1990 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (1990), pp. 1749–1756
Y.Y. Hong, J.S. Lin, C.H. Liu, Fuzzy harmonic power flow analyses, in International Conference on Power System Technology, vol. 1 (2000), pp. 121–125
T. Esposito, G. Carpinelli, P. Varilone, P. Verde, Probabilistic harmonic power flow for percentile evaluation, in Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 2 (2001), pp. 831–838
C.N. Bathurst, B.C. Smith, N.R. Watson, J. Arrillaga, A modular approach to the solution of the three-phase harmonic power-flow. IEEE Tran. Power Deliv. 15(3), 984–989 (2000)
J.H. Teng, C.Y. Teng, Backward/forward sweep-based harmonic analysis method for distribution systems. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 22(3), 1665–1672 (2007)
M. Kiani-Moghaddam, M. Shivaie, A. Salemnia, M.T. Ameli, Probabilistic multi-objective framework for multiple active power filters planning. Electr. Power Compon. Syst 45(18), 2062–2077 (2017)
I. Ziari, A. Jalilian, A new approach for allocation and sizing of multiple active power line conditioners. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 25(2), 1026–1035 (2010)
H.H. Zeineldin, A.F. Zobaa, Particle swarm optimization of passive filters for industrial plants in distribution networks. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 39(16), 1795–1808 (2011)
I. Ziari, A. Jalilian, Optimal allocation and sizing of active power line conditioners using a new particle swarm optimization-based approach. Electr. Power Compon. Syst. 40(12), 273–291 (2012)
Y.Y. Hong, W.J. Liao, Optimal passive filter planning considering probabilistic parameters using cumulant and adaptive dynamic clone selection algorithm. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 45(1), 159–166 (2013)
M. Farhoodnea, A. Mohamed, H. Shareef, H. Zayandehroodi, Optimal placement of active power conditioner in distribution systems using improved discrete firefly algorithm for power quality enhancement. Appl. Soft Comput. 23, 249–258 (2014)
A.F. Zobaa, Optimal multiobjective design of hybrid active power filters considering a distorted environment. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 61(1), 107.114 (2014)
A.F. Zobaa, S.H.E. Abdel Aleem, A new approach for harmonic distortion minimization in power systems supplying nonlinear loads. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 10(2), 1401–1412 (2014)
N.C. Yang, M.D. Le, Optimal design of passive power filters based on multi-objective bat algorithm and Pareto front. Appl. Soft Comput. 35, 257–266 (2015)
M. Mohammadi, Bacterial foraging optimization and adaptive version for economically optimum sitting, sizing and harmonic tuning orders setting of LC harmonic passive power filters in radial distribution systems with linear and nonlinear loads. Appl. Soft Comput. 29, 345–356 (2015)
G. Carpinelli, D. Proto, A. Russo, Optimal planning of active power filters in a distribution system using trade-off/risk method. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 32(2), 841–851 (2017)
S. Frank, I. Steponavice, S. Rebennack, Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey I. Energy Syst. 3(3), 221–258 (2012)
S. Frank, I. Steponavice, S. Rebennack, Optimal power flow: a bibliographic survey II. Energy Syst. 3(3), 259–289 (2012)
E. Rosenblueth, Point estimation for probability moments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 72(10), 3812–3814 (1975)
E. Rosenblueth, Two-point estimates in probability. Appl. Math. Model. 5, 329–335 (1981)
H.P. Hong, An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 59, 261–267 (1998)
N. He, D. Xu, L. Huang, The application of particle swarm optimization to passive and hybrid active power filter design. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 56(8), 2841–2851 (2009)
K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
AC | Alternating current |
AHPFs | Active harmonic power filters |
ANSI | American National Standards Institute |
C | Capacitance |
DC | Direct current |
DDHPF | Deterministic decoupled harmonic power flow |
DNO | Distribution network operator |
FSM | Fuzzy satisfying method |
HA | Harmonic attenuation |
HHPFs | Hybrid harmonic power filters |
ICS | Index of cost saving |
IEEE | Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers |
L | Inductance |
LBNRPF | Loadability-based Newton-Raphson power flow |
MLLF | Motor load loss function |
MMM-EMSA | Multi-stage computational multi-dimensional multiple-homogeneous enhanced melody search algorithm |
MMS-EMSA | Multi-stage computational multi-dimensional single-inhomogeneous enhanced melody search algorithm |
MVAr | Megavolt-ampere reactive power |
NSGA-II | Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II |
PCC | Point of common coupling |
PDHPF | Probabilistic decoupled harmonic power flow |
PHPFs | Passive harmonic power filters |
R | Resistance |
SOSA | Symphony orchestra search algorithm |
SS-HSA | Single-stage computational single-dimensional harmony search algorithm |
SS-IHSA | Single-stage computational single-dimensional improved harmony search algorithm |
THDV | Total harmonic distortion of voltage |
THDI | Total harmonic distortion of current |
TIF | Telephone influence factor |
TLLH | Transmission line loss arising from harmonics |
TMS-EMSA | Two-stage computational multi-dimensional single-homogeneous enhanced melody search algorithm |
TMS-MSA | Two-stage computational multi-dimensional single-homogeneous melody search algorithm |
Two-PEM | Two-point estimate method |
Appendix 2: List of Mathematical Symbols
Index | |
a | Index for AHPFs of type m running from 1 to A |
\( b,{b}^{\prime },\widehat{b} \) | Index for buses of the distribution network running from 1 to B |
h | Index for harmonic orders running from 2 to H |
hc | Index for harmonic order counters running from 1 to HC |
i | Index of concentrations for each uncertainty parameter running from 1 to I |
k | Index for uncertainty parameters running from 1 to K |
m | Index for types of AHPFs running from 1 to M |
n | Index for types of PHPFs running from 1 to N |
p | Index for PHPFs of type n running from 1 to P |
u | Index for iterations of the LBNRPF methodology running from 1 to U |
Set | |
\( {\Psi}_m^{\mathrm{A}} \) | Set of indices of AHPFs of type m |
ΨB | Set of indices of buses of the distribution network |
\( {\Psi}_b^{\mathrm{B}} \) | Set of indices of buses of the distribution network for buses connected to bus b of the distribution network |
ΨH | Set of indices of harmonic orders |
ΨI | Set of indices of concentrations |
ΨK | Set of indices of uncertainty parameters |
ΨM | Set of indices of types of AHPFs |
ΨN | Set of indices of types of PHPFs |
\( {\Psi}_n^{\mathrm{P}} \) | Set of indices of PHPFs of type n |
Parameters | |
\( {A}_b^h \) | Ratio of the current of a nonlinear load on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h to its current in the principal frequency [%] |
D | Distribution network bus voltage vector at initial guess |
f 1 | Principal frequency [Hz] |
f h | Harmonic frequency at harmonic order h [Hz] |
HOV | Harmonic order vector |
\( {I}_b^{1,\mathrm{NLL}} \) | Current of a nonlinear load on bus b of the distribution network for the principal frequency [kA or p.u.] |
\( {I}_b^{h,\mathrm{NLL}} \) | Current of a nonlinear load on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
\( {I}_b^{h,\max } \) | Maximum admissible value of the current on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u. or %] |
\( \left|{I}_l^1\right| \) | Magnitude of the current at line l of the distribution network for the principal frequency [kA or p.u.] |
Imax | Maximum admissible value of the injected current by each AHPF [kA or p.u.] |
P b | Active load—demand—on bus b of the distribution network [MW or p.u.] |
\( {P}_b^1 \) | Active load—demand—on bus b of the distribution network for the principal frequency [MW or p.u.] |
Q b | Reactive load—demand—on bus b of the distribution network [MVAr or p.u.] |
\( {Q}_b^1 \) | Reactive load—demand—on bus b of the distribution network for the principal frequency [MVAr or p.u.] |
Qmax | Maximum admissible value of the principal reactive power compensation by all PHPFs on all buses of the distribution network [MVAr or p.u.] |
\( {Q}_b^{\mathrm{max}} \) | Maximum admissible value of the principal reactive power compensation by all PHPFs on bus b of the distribution network [MVAr or p.u.] |
\( {Q}_{n,b}^{\mathrm{max}} \) | Maximum admissible value of the principal reactive power compensation by each PHPF of type n on bus b of the distribution network [MVAr or p.u.] |
Qmin | Minimum admissible value of the principal reactive power compensation by all PHPFs on all buses of the distribution network [MVAr or p.u.] |
\( {Q}_b^{\mathrm{min}} \) | Minimum admissible value of the principal reactive power compensation by all PHPFs on bus b of the distribution network [MVAr or p.u.] |
\( {Q}_{n,b}^{\mathrm{min}} \) | Minimum admissible value of the principal reactive power compensation by each PHPF of type n on bus b of the distribution network [MVAr or p.u.] |
R b, b' | Resistance between buses b and b′ of the distribution network [Ω or p.u.] |
R l | Resistance of line l of the distribution network [Ω or p.u.] |
TCHFmax | Maximum allowable value of the TCHF index [M$] |
\( {THDI}_b^{\mathrm{max}} \) | Maximum admissible value of THDI on bus b of the distribution network [p.u. or %] |
\( {THDV}_b^{\mathrm{max}} \) | Maximum admissible value of THDV on bus b of the distribution network [p.u. or %] |
\( {V}_b^{h,\max } \) | Maximum admissible value of voltage on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [p.u. or %] |
X b, b' | Inductance between buses b and b′ of the distribution network [Ω or p.u.] |
\( {y}_b^{\mathrm{PA}} \) | Parallel-connected admittance connected to bus b of the distribution network that is available in the initial configuration of the distribution network [℧ or p.u.] |
\( {y}_b^{1,\mathrm{PA}} \) | Parallel-connected admittance connected to bus b of the distribution network that is available in the initial configuration of the distribution network for the principal frequency [℧or p.u.] |
\( {y}_b^{h,\mathrm{PA}} \) | Parallel-connected admittance connected to bus b of the distribution network that is available in the initial configuration of the distribution network for harmonic order h [℧or p.u.] |
\( {y}_{b,{b}^{\prime }} \) | Existing admittance between buses b and b′ of the distribution network [℧or p.u.] |
\( {y}_{b,b\hbox{'}}^h \) | Existing admittance between buses b and b′ of the distribution network for harmonic order h [℧or p.u.] |
\( {y}_{b,\widehat{b}} \) | Existing admittance between buses b and \( \widehat{b} \) of the distribution network [℧or p.u.]. |
\( {y}_{b,\widehat{b}}^h \) | Existing admittance between buses b and \( \widehat{b} \) of the distribution network for harmonic order h [℧or p.u.] |
\( {y}_b^h \) | Admittance of a linear load on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [℧or p.u.] |
\( {y}_{b,{b}^{\prime}}^h \) | Existing admittance between buses b and b′ of the distribution network for harmonic order h [℧or p.u.] |
Y b, b | Element (b,b)—main-diagonal element—of the admittance matrix |
\( {Y}_{b,b}^h \) | Element (b,b)—main-diagonal element—of the admittance matrix for harmonic order h |
\( {Y}_{b,{b}^{\prime }} \) | Element (b,b′)—off-diagonal element—of the admittance matrix |
\( {Y}_{b,{b}^{\prime}}^h \) | Element (b,b′)—off-diagonal element—of the admittance matrix for harmonic order h |
\( {Y}_{b,\widehat{b}} \) | Element (b,\( \widehat{b} \))—off-diagonal element—of the admittance matrix |
Ybus | Admittance matrix of the distribution network |
\( {Y}_{\mathrm{bus}}^h \) | Admittance matrix of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
Z bus | Impedance matrix of the distribution network |
\( {Z}_{\mathrm{bus}}^h \) | Impedance matrix of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( {Z}_{b,{b}^{\prime}}^h \) | Impedance between buses b and b′ of the distribution network for harmonic order h [Ω or p.u.] |
θ b, b | Phase angle of the element (b,b)—main-diagonal element—of the admittance matrix [rad] |
\( {\theta}_{b,{b}^{\prime }} \) | Phase angle of the element (b,b′)—off-diagonal element—of the admittance matrix [rad] |
\( {\theta}_{b,\widehat{b}} \) | Phase angle of the element (b,\( \widehat{b} \))—off-diagonal element—of the admittance matrix [rad] |
ω 0 | The rated angular frequency of the distribution network [rad/sec] |
\( {\tau}_{n,b,p}^{\mathrm{PHPF}} \) | Characteristic coefficient corresponding to the fixed cost of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network [M$] |
\( {\tau}_{m,b,a}^{\mathrm{AHPF}} \) | Characteristic coefficient corresponding to the fixed cost of AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network [M$] |
\( {\upsilon}_{n,b,p}^{\mathrm{PHPF}} \) | Characteristic coefficient corresponding to the variable cost of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network [M$/p.u.] |
\( {\upsilon}_{m,b,a}^{\mathrm{AHPF}} \) | Characteristic coefficient corresponding to the variable cost of AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network [M$/p.u.] |
\( {\kappa}_n^{\mathrm{PHPF}} \) | Certain portion that connects the cost of the inductance and resistance of the PHPFs of type n to the cost of capacitance of corresponding type of PHPFs [%] |
Variables | |
C n, b, p | Capacitance of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network [μF or p.u.] |
D ( u) | Distribution network bus voltage vector at iteration u of the LBNRPF methodology |
E(Y) | First moment of Y |
E(Y2) | Second moment of Y |
F i, b | Reactive power in power transmission lines connected to bus b of the distribution network [MVAr or p.u.] |
F r, b | Active power in power transmission lines connected to bus b of the distribution network [MW or p.u.] |
I h | Current for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
I h, DN | Current of the distribution network’s source for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
\( {I}_b^h \) | Current on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
\( \left|{I}_b^h\right| \) | Magnitude of the current on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
\( {I}_l^h \) | Current at line l of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
I m, b, a | RMS injected current by AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network [kA or p.u.] |
\( {I}_{m,b,a}^h \) | Injected current by AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
\( {I}_{m,b,a}^{h,\mathrm{r}} \) | Real part of the injected current by AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
\( {I}_{m,b,a}^{h,\mathrm{i}} \) | Imaginary part of the injected current by AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
\( {I}_{n,b,p}^{h,\mathrm{cap}} \) | Harmonic current passing through the capacitance relevant to PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
\( \left|{I}_l^h\right| \) | Magnitude of the current at line l of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kA or p.u.] |
J | Jacobian matrix of the distribution network |
L n, b, p | Inductance of PHPF p of type n on bus b of distribution network [mH or p.u.] |
\( {N}_{m,b,a}^{\mathrm{AHPFs}} \) | Number of installed AHPFs on each candidate bus of the distribution network |
\( {N}_{n,b,p}^{\mathrm{PHPFs}} \) | Number of installed PHPFs on each candidate bus of the distribution network |
\( {\mathrm{OF}}_1^{\mathrm{HHPFs}} \) | First objective function of the HHPF planning problem [p.u.] |
\( {\mathrm{OF}}_2^{\mathrm{HHPFs}} \) | Second objective function of the HHPF planning problem [p.u.] |
\( {\mathrm{OF}}_3^{\mathrm{HHPFs}} \) | Third objective function of the HHPF planning problem [p.u.] |
\( {\mathrm{OF}}_4^{\mathrm{HHPFs}} \) | Fourth objective function of the HHPF planning problem [M$] |
Q n, b, p | Principal reactive power compensation by PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network [MVAr or p.u.] |
R n, b, p | Resistance of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network [Ω or p.u.] |
TCHF | Total cost of harmonic power filters [M$] |
THDI | Total harmonic distortion of the current [p.u.] |
THDI l | Total harmonic distortion of the current at line l of the distribution network [p.u.] |
THDV | Total harmonic distortion of the voltage [p.u.] |
THDV b | Total harmonic distortion of the voltage on bus b of the distribution network [p.u.] |
TLLH | Total line loss arising from harmonics [p.u.] |
TLLH h | Total line loss arising from harmonic order h [p.u.] |
V b | Magnitude of the RMS voltage on bus b of the distribution network [kV or p.u.] |
\( {V}_{\widehat{b}} \) | Magnitude of the RMS voltage on bus \( \widehat{b} \) of the distribution network [kV or p.u.] |
\( {V}_{b^{\prime }} \) | Magnitude of the RMS voltage on bus b′ of the distribution network [kV or p.u.] |
\( {V}_b^h \) | RMS voltage on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kV or p.u.] |
\( {V}_{b^{\prime}}^h \) | RMS voltage on bus b′ of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kV or p.u.] |
V h | Voltage at harmonic order h [kV or p.u.] |
\( {V}_{n,b,p}^{h,\mathrm{cap}} \) | Harmonic voltage drop on the capacitance associated with PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kV or p.u.] |
|Vb| | Magnitude of the RMS voltage on bus b of the distribution network [kV or p.u.] |
\( \left|{V}_b^1\right| \) | Magnitude of the RMS voltage on bus b of the distribution network for the principal frequency [kV or p.u.] |
\( \left|{V}_b^h\right| \) | Magnitude of the voltage on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [kV or p.u.] |
X | Input uncertainty parameter vector |
Y | Output uncertainty parameter vector, which is directly affected by input uncertainty parameters |
\( \tilde{\mathrm{Y}} \) | Output uncertainty parameter vector, which is indirectly affected by input uncertainty parameters |
\( {Y}_{n,b,p}^h \) | Equivalent admittance associated with PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network for harmonic order h [℧or p.u.] |
α n, b, p | Binary variable, which is 0 if there is no PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network; 1 if there is a PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network |
β m, b, a | Binary variable, which is 0 if there is no AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network; 1 if there is an AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network |
\( {\varpi}_{n,b,p}^{\mathrm{PHPF}} \) | Nominal capacity of the capacitance of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network [μF or p.u.] |
\( {\varpi}_{m,b,a}^{\mathrm{AHPF}} \) | Nominal capacity of AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network [kA or p.u.] |
δ k, 1 | Location of the first concentration of probabilistic parameter k |
δ k, 2 | Location of the second concentration of probabilistic parameter k |
λ k, 3 | Skewness of probabilistic parameter k |
ρ k, 1 | Probability of the first concentration of probabilistic parameter k |
ρ k, 2 | Probability of the second concentration of probabilistic parameter k |
x k, 1 | First concentration point of probabilistic parameter k |
x k, 2 | Second concentration point of probabilistic parameter k |
μ X, k | Mean value of vector Xk |
σ X, k | Standard deviation of vector Xk |
η b, a | Correction coefficient related to AHPF a on bus b of the distribution network |
ζ h | Harmonic attenuation coefficient for harmonic order h |
ϕ b | Phase shift of the voltage on bus b of the distribution network with respect to the voltage phase angle of the slack bus [rad] |
ϕ b | Phase angle of the RMS voltage on bus b of the distribution network [rad] |
\( {\phi}_{\widehat{b}} \) | Phase angle of the RMS voltage on bus \( \widehat{b} \) of the distribution network [rad] |
\( {\phi}_{b^{\prime }} \) | Phase angle of the RMS voltage on bus b′ of the distribution network [rad] |
χ n, b, p | Tuned frequency of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network |
γ n, b, p | Quality coefficient of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network |
ω | The angular frequency [rad/s] |
ΔCn, b, p | Variation of the capacitance of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network due to perturbation problems [μF or p.u.] |
ΔD(u) | Corrective vector at iteration u of the LBNRPF methodology |
Δf1 | Variation of the principal frequency of the distribution network due to perturbation problems [Hz] |
ΔIh | Additional harmonic current coefficient vector arising from the installation of different types of AHPFs on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( \Delta {I}_m^h \) | Additional harmonic current coefficient vector arising from the installation of AHPFs of type m on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
ΔLn, b, p | Variation of the inductance of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network due to perturbation problems [mH or p.u.] |
ΔRn, b, p | Variation of the resistance of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network due to perturbation problems [Ω or p.u.] |
ΔPb | Active mismatch power on bus b of the distribution network [MW] |
ΔQb | Reactive mismatch power on bus b of the distribution network [MVAr] |
ΔW(u)(D(u)) | Mismatch power vector at iteration u of the LBNRPF methodology |
ΔWb | Element b of the mismatch power vector or mismatch power on bus b of the distribution network |
ΔYh | Additional admittance matrix resulting from the installation of various types of PHPFs on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( \Delta {Y}_n^h \) | Additional admittance matrix resulting from the installation of PHPFs of type n on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( \Delta {Y}_1^h \) | Additional admittance matrix resulting from the installation of the fifth second-order series resonant band-pass PHPFs on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( \Delta {Y}_2^h \) | Additional admittance matrix resulting from the installation of the seventh second-order series resonant band-pass PHPFs on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( \Delta {Y}_3^h \) | Additional admittance matrix resulting from the installation of the second-order damped high-pass PHPFs on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
ΔZh | Additional impedance matrix resulting from the installation of various types of PHPFs on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( \Delta {Z}_n^h \) | Additional impedance matrix resulting from the installation of PHPFs of type n on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( \Delta {Z}_1^h \) | Additional impedance matrix resulting from the installation of the fifth second-order series resonant band-pass PHPFs on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( \Delta {Z}_2^h \) | Additional impedance matrix resulting from the installation of the seventh second-order series resonant band-pass PHPFs on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
\( \Delta {Z}_3^h \) | Additional impedance matrix resulting from the installation of the second-order damped high-pass PHPFs on different buses of the distribution network for harmonic order h |
ΔZbus | Variation of the impedance of the distribution network due to perturbation problems [Ω] |
\( \Upsilon \left({\vartheta}_{n,b,p}^{\mathrm{PHPF}}\right) \) | Cost function of PHPF p of type n on bus b of the distribution network [M$] |
\( \Upsilon \left({\vartheta}_{m,b,a}^{\mathrm{AHPF}}\right) \) | Cost function of AHPF a of type m on bus b of the distribution network [M$] |
Appendix 3: Input Data
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiani-Moghaddam, M., Shivaie, M., Weinsier, P.D. (2019). Power Filters Planning. In: Modern Music-Inspired Optimization Algorithms for Electric Power Systems. Power Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12044-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12044-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12043-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12044-3
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)