Abstract
Sustaining competitiveness in global market is dependent on organizations’ capacity to innovate; revelation of tacit knowledge and its incorporation in organisations’ structures and processes, comprise an important factor in exploring and implementing innovation. Virtual communities of practice (CoPs) and virtual learning communities are becoming widespread within Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) thanks to technological developments which enable increased communication, interactivity among participants and incorporation of collaborative pedagogical models, specifically through information communications technologies (ICTs). This paper presents a design framework for building a Virtual Community of Practice (VCoP) incorporating company stakeholders, academics, researchers and school practitioners as prospect members of the community, who interact on the basis of knowledge sharing on IT technologies and engineering: the design characteristics, important concepts, structures and preliminary data are presented. Design research sets the methodological framework used, while, in the context of applying ethnographic practices, qualitative data have been collected to support the proposed design mechanism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Young, R.: Knowledge management tools and techniques manual. Asian Prod. Organ., 3–14 (2013)
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., Snyder, W.M.: Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (2002)
Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., Robertson, M.: The construction of “Communities of Practice” in the management of innovation. Manag. Learn. 33, 477 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602334005.available, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247748275_The_Construction_of_Communities_of_Practice’_in_the_Management_of_Innovation. Accessed 26 May 2018
Ardichvili, A., Page, V., Wenthling, T.: Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. J. Knowl. Manag. 7(1), 64–77 (2003)
Barrett, M., Cappleman, S., Shoib, G., Walsham, G.: Learning in knowledge communities: managing technology and context. Eur. Manag. J. 22(1), 1–11 (2004)
Squire, K., Johnson, C.: Supporting distributed communities of practice with interactive television. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 48(1), 23–43 (2000)
Barab, S.A., Duffy, T.: From practice fields to communities of practice (CRLT Technical Report No. 1–98) (2000). Retrieved from http://crlt.indiana.edu/publications/duffy_publ3.pdf
Delaney, K., O’Keeffe, M., Fragou, O.: A design framework for interdisciplinary communities of practice towards STEM learning in 2nd level education. In: Auer, M., Guralnick, D., Simonics, I. (eds.) Teaching and Learning in a Digital World. ICL 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 715. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_86
Goumopoulos, C., Fragou, O., Chanos, N., Delistavrou, K., Jaharakis, J., Kameas, A.: The UMI-Sci-Ed platform: integrating UMI technologies to promote science education. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU) (2018). ISBN 978-989-758-291-2
Kumpulainen, K., Lipponen, L.: Productive interaction as agentic participation in dialogic enquiry. In: Littleton, K., Howe, C. (eds.) Educational Dialogues. Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction, pp. 48–63. Routledge, London (2010)
Pan, S.L., Leidner, D.E.: Bridging Communities of practice with information technology in pursuit of global knowledge sharing. J. Strat. Inf. Syst. 12, 71–88 (2003)
McKay, J., Marshall, P.: The dual imperatives of action research. Inf. Technol. People 14(1), 46–59 (2001)
Fragou, O., Kameas A., Zacharakis, I.D.: An instructional design process for constructing a U learning ecology. In: Proceedings of 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON 2017), pp. 1797–1806. IEEE (2017)
Laurel, B.: Design Research: Methods and Perspectives. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge (2003)
Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005)
Gerbic, P., Stacey, E.: A purposive approach to content analysis: designing analytical frameworks. Internet High. Educ. 8, 45–59 (2005)
Badinelli, R., Barile, S., Ng, I., Polese, F., Saviano, M., Di Nauta, P.: Viable service systems and decision making in service management. J. Serv. Manag. 23(4), 498–526 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231211260396
Peppard, J., Ward, J.: Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability. J. Strat. Inf. Syst. 13(2), 167–194 (2004)
Brooke, J.: SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmesster, B.A., McClelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)
Ranmuthugala, G., Cunningham, F.C., Plumb, J.J., Long, J., Georgiou, A., Westbrook, J.I., Braithwaite, J.: A realist evaluation of the role of communities of practice in changing healthcare practice. Science 6, 49 (2011)
Wenger, E., Trayner, B., de Laat, M.: Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework. Rapport 18, Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open University of the Netherlands (2011)
Acknowledgment
Dr Olga Fragou is currently an Academic Tutor in Hellenic Open University. The research schema and protocols presented in this paper have been designed and conducted by the author during her research work (2016–2017) at Computer Technology Institute and Press- Diophantus (http://www.cti.gr), for Horizon 2020 Project “UMI-Sci-Εd: Exploring Ubiquitous, Mobile and Internet of Things Technology in Science Education”, GA 750183. The information and views set out in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Neither the European Union institutions and bodies nor any person acting on their behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fragou, O. (2020). A Design Framework for Building a Virtual Community of Practice. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education. ICL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 916. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11932-4_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11931-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11932-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)