Skip to main content

Preference Disaggregation for Multicriteria Decision Aiding: An Overview and Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Multiple Criteria Decision Making ((MCDM))

Abstract

In multicriteria decision aiding, preference disaggregation analysis involves the inference of preferential information from holistic judgments that the decision maker provides. This area of research has attracted strong interest and various methodologies have been proposed over the past three decades for different types of decision problems and multicriteria models. This chapter overviews the developments and perspective in this field, covering established techniques as well as the state-of-the-art developments and future prospects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angilella, S., Greco, S., & Matarazzo, B. (2010). Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(1), 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bana e Costa, C. A. B., Corte, J. M. D., & Vansnick, J. C. (2016). On the mathematical foundations of MACBETH. In: S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, J. Figueira (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis—State of the art surveys (pp. 421–463). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belacel, N., Bhasker Raval, H., & Punnenc, A. P. (2007). Learning multicriteria fuzzy classification method PROAFTN from data. Computers and Operations Research, 34, 1885–1898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belahcène, K., Labreuche, C., Maudet, N., Mousseau, V., & Ouerdane, W. (2018). An efficient SAT formulation for learning multiple criteria non-compensatory sorting rules from examples. Computers & Operations Research, 97, 58–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisdorff, R., Meyer, P., & Veneziano, T. (2013). Elicitation of criteria weights maximising the stability of pairwise outranking statements. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 21(1–2), 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bous, B., Fortemps, P., Glineur, F., & Pirlot, M. (2010). ACUTA: A novel method for eliciting additive value functions on the basis of holistic preference statements. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(2), 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans, J. P., & De Smet, Y. (2016). Promethee methods. In S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, & J. Figueira (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis-state of the art surveys (pp. 187–220). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cailloux, O., Tervonen, T., Verhaegen, B., & Picalausa, F. (2014). A data model for algorithmic multiple criteria decision analysis. Annals of Operations Research, 217(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Lin, S. (2003). An interactive neural network-based approach for solving multiple criteria decision-making problems. Decision Support Systems, 36, 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrente, S., Greco, S., Kadziński, M., & Słowiński, R. (2016). Inducing probability distributions on the set of value functions by subjective stochastic ordinal regression. Knowledge-Based Systems, 112, 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covantes, E., Fernández, E., & Navarro, J. (2016). Handling the multiplicity of solutions in a MOEA based PDA-THESEUS framework for multi-criteria sorting. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 41(4), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, L., & Mousseau, V. (2006). Inferring ELECTRE’s veto-related parameters from outranking examples. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 172–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, L., Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., & Clímaco, J. (2002). An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M. (2010). Learning non-monotonic additive value functions for multicriteria decision making. OR Spectrum, 34(1), 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., Marinakis, Y., Marinaki, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2009). An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: The case of the ELECTRE TRI method. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(2), 496–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2002). Multicriteria decision aid classification methods. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2002). On the development of an outranking relation for ordinal classification problems: An experimental investigation of a new methodology. Optimization Methods and Software, 17(2), 293–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2004). A multicriteria classification approach based on pairwise comparisons. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(2), 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2007). Regularized estimation for preference disaggregation in multiple criteria decision making. Computational Optimization and Applications, 38(1), 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2011). Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 209(3), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2016). Data-driven robustness analysis for multicriteria classification problems using preference disaggregation approaches. In M. Doumpos, C. Zopounidis, & E. Grigoroudis (Eds.), Robustness analysis in decision aiding, optimization, and analytics (pp. 21–37). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppe, S., & De Smet, Y. (2012). Studying the impact of information structure in the PROMETHEE II preference elicitation process: A simulation based approach. In S. Greco, B. Bouchon-Meunier, G. Coletti, M. Fedrizzi, B. Matarazzo, & R. R. Yager (Eds.), Communications in computer and information science (pp. 383–392). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E., Navarro, J., & Mazcorro, G. (2012). Evolutionary multi-objective optimization for inferring outranking model’s parameters under scarce reference information and effects of reinforced preference. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 37(3), 163–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira, J. R., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2009). Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(2), 460–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira, J. R., Mousseau, V., & Roy, B. (2016). ELECTRE methods. In S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, & J. Figueira (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis—State of the art surveys (pp. 155–185). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortemps, P., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Multicriteria decision support using rules that represent rough-graded preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 188, 206–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frikha, H., Chabchoub, H., & Martel, J. M. (2010). Inferring criteria’s relative importance coefficients in PROMETHEE II. International Journal of Operational Research, 7(2), 257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frikha, H., Chabchoub, H., & Martel, J. M. (2011). An interactive disaggregation approach inferring the indifference and the preference thresholds of PROMETHEE II. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 1(4), 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fürnkranz, J., & Hüllermeier, E. (2011). Preference learning. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14125-6.

  • Goletsis, Y., Papaloukas, C., Fotiadis, D. I., Likas, A., & Michalis, L. K. (2004). Automated ischemic beat classification using genetic algorithms and multicriteria decision analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51(10), 1717–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabisch, M., & Labreuche, C. (2008). A decade of application of the Choquet and Sugeno integrals in multi-criteria decision aid. 4OR, 6(1), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Kadziński, M., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2011). ELECTRE\(^{\rm GKMS}\): Robust ordinal regression for outranking methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 214(1), 118–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Kadziński, M., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2012). Robust ordinal regression for multiple criteria group decision: UTA\(^{\rm GMS}\)-GROUP and UTADIS\(^{\rm GKMS}\)-GROUP. Decision Support Systems, 52(3), 549–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (1999). Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 117, 63–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2001). Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2004). Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(2), 271–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Matarazzo, B., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Dominance-based rough set approach to interactive multiobjective optimization. In J. Branke, K. Deb, K. Miettinen, & R. Slowinski (Eds.), Multiobjective optimization (pp. 121–155). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2008). Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 191(2), 416–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (2010). Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1455–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Słowiński, R., Figueira, J. R., & Mousseau, V. (2008). Robust ordinal regression. In M. Ehrgott, S. Greco, & J. Figueira (Eds.), Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis (pp. 241–283). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Słowiński, R., & Yao, Y. (2007). Bayesian decision theory for dominance-based rough set approach. In J. Yao, P. Lingras, W. Z. Wu, M. Szczuka, N. Cercone, & S. Ślȩzak (Eds.), Rough sets and knowledge technology (pp. 134–141). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoroudis, E., & Siskos, Y. (2002). Preference disaggregation for measuring and analysing customer satisfaction: The MUSA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(1), 148–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbrich, R., Graepel, T., & Obermayer, K. (2000). Large margin rank boundaries for ordinal regression. In A. Smola, P. Bartlett, B. Schölkopf, & D. Schuurmans (Eds.), Advances in large margin classifiers (pp. 115–132). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. C. (2009). Bankruptcy prediction using electre-based single-layer perceptron. Neurocomputing, 72, 3150–3157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., & Siskos, Y. (1982). Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., & Siskos, Y. (2001). Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadziński, M., & Ciomek, K. (2016). Integrated framework for preference modeling and robustness analysis for outranking-based multiple criteria sorting with ELECTRE and PROMETHEE. Information Sciences, 352–353, 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadzinski, M., Ghaderi, M., Wasikowski, J., & Agell, N. (2017). Expressiveness and robustness measures for the evaluation of an additive value function in multiple criteria preference disaggregation methods: An experimental analysis. Computers & Operations Research, 87, 146–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadziński, M., Greco, S., & Słowiński, R. (2012). Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression. Omega, 40(4), 488–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadziński, M., & Michalski, M. (2016). Scoring procedures for multiple criteria decision aiding with robust and stochastic ordinal regression. Computers & Operations Research, 71, 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadziński, M., Słowiński, R., & Greco, S. (2016). Robustness analysis for decision under uncertainty with rule-based preference model. Information Sciences, 328, 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadziński, M., & Tervonen, T. (2013). Stochastic ordinal regression for multiple criteria sorting problems. Decision Support Systems, 55(1), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köksalan, M., Mousseau, V., & Zpeynirci, S. Multi-criteria sorting with category size restrictions. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 16(01), 5–23 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojadinovic, I. (2004). Estimation of the weights of interacting criteria from the set of profiles by means of information-theoretic functionals. European Journal of Operational Research, 155(3), 741–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahdelma, R., & Salminen, P. (2001). SMAA-2: Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research, 49(3), 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakooti, B., & Raman, V. (2000). Clustering and selection of multiple criteria alternatives using unsupervised and supervised neural networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11, 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malakooti, B., & Zhou, Y. (1994). Feedforward artificial neural networks for solving discrete multiple criteria decision making problems. Management Science, 40(11), 1542–1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marichal, J. L., & Roubens, M. (2000). Determination of weights of interacting criteria from a reference set. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(3), 641–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martel, J. M., & Matarazzo, B. (2016). Other outranking approaches. In S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, & J. Figueira (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys (pp. 221–282). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Dias, L., Gomes da Silva, C., & Clímaco, J. (2003). Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., & Naux, J. P. (2001). Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: Some experimental results. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau, V., & Słowiński, R. (1998). Inferring an ELECTRE-TRI model from assignment examples. Journal of Global Optimization, 12(2), 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahikkala, T., Waegeman, W., Tsivtsivadze, E., Salakoski, T., & De Baets, B. (2010). Learning intransitive reciprocal relations with kernel methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(3), 676–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak, Z., & Słowiński, R. (1994). Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 72, 443–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1968). Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples: La méthode ELECTRE. Revue Francaise d’Informatique et de Recherche Opérationnelle, 8, 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., & Bouyssou, D. (1993). Aide multicritre à la décision: Méthodes et Cas. Paris, France: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, Y., & Grigoroudis, E. (2010). New trends in aggregation-disaggregation approaches. In C. Zopounidis & P. Pardalos (Eds.), Handbook of multicriteria analysis (pp. 189–214). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskos, Y., Grigoroudis, E., & Matsatsinis, N. F. (2016). UTA methods. In S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, & J. Figueira (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision analysis—State of the art surveys (2nd ed., pp. 315–362). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., & Pirlot, M. (2013). Learning a majority rule model from large sets of assignment examples. In P. Perny, M. Pirlot, & A. Tsoukiàs (Eds.), Proceedings of Third International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory, ADT 2013, Bruxelles, Belgium, 12–14 Nov 2013 (pp. 336–350). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobrie, O., Mousseau, V., & Pirlot, M. (2018). Learning monotone preferences using a majority rule sorting model. International Transactions in Operational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tervonen, T., Figueira, J. R., Lahdelma, R., Dias, J. A., & Salminen, P. (2009). A stochastic method for robustness analysis in sorting problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1), 236–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Assche, D., & De Smet, Y. (2016). FlowSort parameters elicitation based on categorisation examples. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 6(3), 191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetschera, R., Chen, Y., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (2010). Robustness and information levels in case-based multiple criteria sorting. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(3), 841–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waegeman, W., De Baets, B., & Boullart, B. (2009). Kernel-based learning methods for preference aggregation. 4OR, 7, 169–189 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, J., Takougang, S., Mousseau, V., & Pirlot, M. (2014). Learning criteria weights of an optimistic ELECTRE TRI sorting rule. Computers & Operations Research, 49, 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2000). Building additive utilities for multi-group hierarchical discrimination: The M.H.D is method. Optimization Methods and Software, 14(3), 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2002). Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 138(2), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michalis Doumpos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C. (2019). Preference Disaggregation for Multicriteria Decision Aiding: An Overview and Perspectives. In: Doumpos, M., Figueira, J., Greco, S., Zopounidis, C. (eds) New Perspectives in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11482-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics