Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Promoting Dignity in the Care of the Older Adult

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Primary Care Mental Health in Older People

Abstract

This chapter considers the importance of dignity in the care of older people. It starts with a case vignette to illustrate that dignity is not simply a medical input but a holistic approach to life. It considers the definition of dignity and how this is related to all aspects of care in older people with special reference to clinical syndromes including frailty and dementia and the need for evidence-based care delivery to avoid violations of an individual’s dignity. Technology has an increasing role to play in care delivery to older adults, and this is considered through the lens of dignity. Recommendations include:

  • Maintaining older adults’ independence as much as possible should always be at the centre of their care plans. This can be facilitated by giving older adults choice and involving them and their carers in developing and implementing care plans.

  • For frail older adults and those with dementia, for example, caregivers should always balance the need for safety with the older adult’s independence and autonomy.

  • All staff caring for older adults must be suitably trained and supported to maintain dignity in older adults. They must be aware of the older adult’s cultural background and respect any cultural sensitivity, demonstrating empathy, respect and kindness while caring for the older adult.

  • Older adults are more likely to be receiving care from different agencies due to co-morbidities, personal care and social needs. Collaborative care is a good model to ensure that all the agencies/caregivers work together with the older adult at the centre.

  • Services that provide care for older adults such as care homes, sheltered housing and hospitals should embrace and invest in new technology to help enhance older adults’ independence and quality of life.

  • Social isolation is a risk factor for poor mental health, which can affect older adults’ self-esteem. Health and social care commissioners should ensure there are facilities in place to identify and help older adults at risk of social isolation such as befriending schemes and day centres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Saxena S, Hanna F. Dignity—a fundamental principle of mental health care. Indian J Med Res. 2015;142(4):355–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. UN General Assembly. International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 933; 1966. p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. WHO. WHO quality rights tool kit to assess and improve quality and human rights in mental health and social care facilities. Geneva: WHO; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferri CP, Prince M, Brayne C, Brodaty H, Fratiglioni L, Ganguli M, Hall K, Hasegawa K, Hendrie H, Huang Y, Jorm A, Mathers C, Menezes PR, Rimmer E, Scafuzca M. Alzheimer’s disease international. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet. 2005;366(9503):2112–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobzone S. Ageing and care for frail older adult persons. An overview of international perspectives, OECD labour market and social policy occasional papers no. 38. Paris: OECD Publishing; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lothian K, Philip I. Maintaining the dignity and autonomy of older people in the healthcare setting. BMJ. 2001;322:668–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Levenson R, Jeyasingham M, Joule N. Looking forward to care in old age. Care services inquiry working paper. London: Kings Fund; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hall S, Dodd RH, Higginson IJ. Maintaining dignity for residents of care homes: a qualitative study of the views of care home staff, community nurses, residents and their families. Geriatr Nurs. 2014;35:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2013.10.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gallagher A, Li S, Wainwright P, Jones IR, Lee D. Dignity in the care of older people—a review of the theoretical and empirical literature. BMC Nurs. 2008;7:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-7-11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Picker Institute Europe. Improving patients’ experience: sharing good care no. 11 stroke care: the National Picture. Oxford: Picker Institute Europe; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nordenfelt L. Dignity in the care of the older adult. Med Health Care Philos. 2003;6:103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Department of Health. A new ambition for old age. London: Department of Health; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gallagher A. Editorial: what do we know about dignity in care? Nurs Ethics. 2011;18(4):471–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. International Council of Nurses. The ICN code of practice for nurses. Geneva: ICN; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Medical Association. World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics. Adopted by the 3 General Assembly of the World Medical Association, London, England, October 1949 and amended by the 22 World Medical Assembly, Sydney, Australia, August 1968 and the 35 World Medical Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 1983 and the 57 WMA General Assembly, Pilanesberg, South Africa, October 2006. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-international-code-of-medical-ethics/. Accessed 10 July 2018.

  16. UN General Assembly. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris: 10 December 1948, 217 A (III). http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.html. Accessed 10 July 2018.

  17. Mann J. Dignity and health: the UDHR’s revolutionary first article. Health Hum Rights. 1998;3(2):30–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Freid LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdeiner J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA, Cardiovascular Health Study. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol. 2001;56A(3):M146–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sternberg SA, Schwartz AW, Karunananthan S, Bergman H, Clarfield AM. The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(11):2129–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03597.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dent E, Lien C, Lim WS, Wong WC, Wong CH, Ng TP, Woo J, Dong B, de la Vega S, Poi PJH, Kamaruzzamana SBB, Won C, Chen L-K, Rockwood K, Arai H, Rodriguez-Manas L, Cao L, Cesari M, Cahn P, Leung E, Landi F, Fried LP, Morley JE, Vellas B, Flicker L. The Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines for the management of frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18:564–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Onder G, Liperoti R, Fialova D, Topinkova E, Tosato M, Danese P, Gallo PF, Carpenter I, Finne-Soveri H, Gindin J, Bernabei R, Landi F, SHELTER Project. Polypharmacy in nursing home in Europe: results from the SHELTER study. Send to J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67(6):698–704. https://doi.org/10.1093/Gerona/glr233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lavan AH, Gallagher P, Parsons C, O’Mahoney D. STOPPFrail (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescription in Frail adults with limited life expectancy): consensus validation. Age Ageing. 2017;46:600–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lavan AH, Gallagher P, O’Mahoney D. Inter-rater reliability of STOPPFrail (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy) criteria amongst 12 physicians. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;74(3):331–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-017-2376-2. Epub 2017 Nov 20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sevilla-Sánchez D, Molist-Brunet N, Espaulella-Panicot J, González-Bueno J, Solà-Bonada N, Amblàs-Novellas J, Codina-Jané C. Potentially inappropriate medication in palliative care patients according to STOPP-Frail criteria. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018;9(4):543–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang M, D’Arcy C, Price SD, Sanfilippo FM, Preen DB, Bulsara MK. Co-morbidity and repeat admissions to hospital for adverse drug reactions. BMJ. 2009;338:a2752. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2752.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cresswell KM, Fernando B, McKinstry B, Sheikh A. Adverse drug events in the elderly. Br Med Bull. 2007;83:259–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldm016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Volicer L. Goals of care in advanced dementia: quality of life, dignity and comfort. J Nutr Health Aging. 2007;11(6):481.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smits CHM, de Lange J, Dröes R-M, Meiland F, Vernooij-Dassen M, Pot AM. Effects of combined intervention programmes for people with dementia living at home and their caregivers: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22:1181–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Funk M, Ivbijaro G, editors. Integrating mental health into primary care: a global perspective. Geneva/ London: WHO/Wonca; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ngo J, Holroyd-Leduc JM. Systematic review of recent dementia practice guidelines. Age Ageing. 2015;44:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afu143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharkey A, Sharkey N. Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the older adult. Ethics Inf Technol. 2012;14:27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lesnoff-Caravaglia G. Gerontechnology: growing old in a technological society. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frennert S, Östlund B, Eftring H. Would granny let an assistive robot into her home? In: Ge SS, Khatib O, Cabibihan JJ, Simmons R, Williams MA, editors. Social robotics. ICSR 2012. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 7621. Berlin: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Allen C, Wallach W, Smit I. Why machine ethics? IEEE Intell Syst. 2006;21(4):12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Anderson M, Andeerson SL, Armen C. An approach to computing ethics. IEEE Intell Syst. 2006;21(4):56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Banks MR, Banks WA. The effects of group and individual animal assisted therapy on loneliness in residents of long-term care facilities. Anthrozoös. 2005;18:396–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Banks MR, Willoughby LM, Banks WA. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008;9:173–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wada K, Shibata T. Living with seal robots – its sociopsychological and psychological influences on the older adult at a care home. IEEE Trans Robot. 2007;23(5):972–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Baum MM, Bergstom N, Langston NF, Thoma L. Physiological effects of human/companion animal bonding. Nurs Res. 1984;33(3):126–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gammonley J, Yates J. Pet projects animal assisted therapy in nursing homes. J Gerontol Nurs. 1991;17(1):12–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mordoch E, Osterreicher A, Guse L, Roger K, Thompson G. Use of social commitment robots in the care of older adult people with dementia. Maturitas. 2013;74:14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Van Breemen A, Yan X, Meerbeek B. iCAT: an animated user-interface robot with personality. Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems; 2005. p. 143–4.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pineau J, Montemerlo M, Pollack M, Roy N, Thrun S. Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: challenges and results. Robot Auton Syst. 2003;42(3-4):271–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-88909(02)00381-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Searight HR, Gafford J. Cultural diversity at the end of life: issues and guidelines for family physicians. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71(3):515–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1163–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dy SM, Shurarman LR, Lorenz KA, Mularski RA, Lynn J. A systematic review of satisfaction with care at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(1):124–9. Epub 2007 Nov 20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01507.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Anttonen A, Haïkïö L. Care ‘going market’: Finnish older adult-care policies in transition. Nord J Soc Res. 2011;2:70–90. https://doi.org/10.15845/njsr.v2i0.111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bland R. Independence, privacy and risk: two contrasting approaches to residential care for older people. Ageing Soc. 1999;19:539–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Marek KD, Rantz MJ. Aging in place: a new model for long term care. Nurs Adm Q. 2000;24(3):1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hendriks N, Truyen F, Duval E. Designing with dementia: guidelines for participatory design together with persons with dementia. In: IFIP conference on human-computer interaction. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 649–66.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Baillie L. Patient dignity in an acute hospital setting: a case study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:23–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Walsh K, Kwanko I. Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of dignity. Int J Nurs Pract. 2002;8(3):143–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Van der Geest S. The toilet: dignity, privacy and care of older adult people in Kwahu, Ghana. In: Stroeken K, Makoni S, editors. Ageing in Africa. London: Routledge; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wårdh I, Andersson L, Sörensen S. Staff attitudes to oral health. A comparative study of registered nurses, nursing assistants and home care aides. Gerodontology. 1997;14(1):28–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Stanley SH, Laugharne JDE. Clinical guidelines for the physical care of mental health consumers: a comprehensive assessment of monitoring package for mental health and primary care clinicians. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2011;45:824–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cederholm T, Barazzoni R, Austin P, Ballmer P, Biolo G, Bischoff SC, Compher C, Correia I, Higashiguchi T, Holst M, Jensen GL, Malone A, Muscaritoli M, Nyulasi I, Pirlich M, Rothenberg E, Schindler K, Schneider SM, de van der Schueren MAE, Sieber C, Valentini L, Yu JC, Van Gossum A, Singer P. ESPEN guidelines and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(1):49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. NHS Digital. Patient led assessments of the care environment (PLACE). https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/areas-of-interest/estates-and-facilities/patient-led-assessments-of-the-care-environment-place#assessment-forms. Accessed 14 July 2018.

  58. Caris-Verhallen WMCM, Kerkstra A, Bensing JM. The role of communication in nursing care for older adult people: a review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25:915–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government. Statutory homelessness and prevention and relief, October to December (Q4) 2017: London. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Culhane DP, Metraux S, Byrne T, Steno M, Bainbridge J. The age structure of contemporary homelessness: evidence and implications for public policy. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy. 2013;13:1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hahn JA, Kushel MB, Bangsberg DR, Riley E, Moss AR. The aging of the homeless population: fourteen-year trends in San Francisco. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:775–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Baggett TP, Singer DE, Rigotti NA, O’Connel JJ. The unmet needs of homeless adults. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(7):1326–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Brown RT, Hemati K, Riley ED, Lee CT, Ponath C, Tieu L, Guzman D, Kushel MB. Geriatric conditions in a population-based sample of older homeless adults. The Gerontologist. 2017;57(4):757–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Healthwatch England. Safely home: what happens when people leave hospital and care settings? Healthwatch England special inquiry findings July 2015. London: Healthwatch England; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  65. O’Connell JJ. Premature mortality in homeless populations: a review of the literature. National Health Care for the Homeless Council; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sinclair S, Torres M-B, Raffin-Bouchal S, Hack TF, McClement S, Hagen NA, Chochinov HM. Compassion training in healthcare: what are patients’ perspectives on training healthcare providers? BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0695-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Halpern J. What is clinical empathy? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(8):670–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Lee T. How to spread empathy in healthcare. Harv Bus Rev. 2014. https://hbr.org/2014/07/how-to-spread-empathy-in-health-care.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NOVA University, Lisbon, Portugal

    Gabriel Ivbijaro & Lucja Kolkiewicz

  2. Waltham Forest Community and Family Health Services, London, UK

    Gabriel Ivbijaro

  3. East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

    Lucja Kolkiewicz

  4. King’s College, London, UK

    David Goldberg

  5. ModelPeople Inc. Global Insights, Chicago, IL, USA

    Claire Brooks

  6. Public Health Department, London Borough of Waltham Forest, London, UK

    Yaccub Enum

  7. East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

    Yaccub Enum

Authors
  1. Gabriel Ivbijaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lucja Kolkiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. David Goldberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Claire Brooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yaccub Enum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Unité de Psychiatrie et de Psychothérapie, Centre Les Toises, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Carlos Augusto de Mendonça Lima

  2. Mental Health and Population Health, NOVA University Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

    Gabriel Ivbijaro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ivbijaro, G., Kolkiewicz, L., Goldberg, D., Brooks, C., Enum, Y. (2019). Promoting Dignity in the Care of the Older Adult. In: de Mendonça Lima, C., Ivbijaro, G. (eds) Primary Care Mental Health in Older People. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10814-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10814-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10812-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10814-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation