Abstract
Before one’s arrival in a diplomatic or consular post abroad, not only the high-ranking staff but also low-level employees are interested in learning the national policy in that country, the national interests, and the problems at stake. That is essential knowledge to work in consular posts. Civil servants share narratives that convey sense to visa policy on the ground, by suggesting the issues at stake in delivering visas and what visa policy should do, and to officers’ work, by suggesting the purposes to which their daily action is bent. Narratives place current action in a series of past events. Thus, history differentiates contexts also from the point of view of the sense attributed to EU visa policy. National understandings persist although EU visa policy. Thus, the understandings of visa policy in Morocco vary considerably. According to Belgium, visa policy is ‘sensitive migration control.’ According to Italy, it is ‘scorned migration control.’ According to France, it is ‘migration control and diplomacy.’ Narratives also portray Moroccan applicants therefore nourishing very different subjective representations of the policy recipients. To Belgium, France, and Italy respectively, Moroccan applicants are ‘networked,’ ‘demanding and clientes,’ and ‘wrong.’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The OFII (Office Français de l’Immigration et de l’Intégration) is based in Casablanca. It is in charge of all aspects of work immigration and family immigration except for the issuance of visas.
- 2.
Campus France is the French Agency for the promotion of higher education, international student services, and international mobility.
- 3.
Dans le contexte africain local, le visa pour la France est encore perçu comme un droit moral dont chacun disposerait en raison de l’histoire. Dans ces conditions, les refus sont souvent ressentis comme la violation d’un droit historique et ceux qui en font l’objet recherchent tout naturellement une autorité supérieure susceptible d’inverser la décision de rejet. Source: https://www.senat.fr/rap/r06-353/r06-3539.html. Accessed 28 April 2018.
- 4.
Source: Sous Directions Des Visas, Nantes.
References
Banerjee, S. (1998). Narratives and Interaction: A Constitutive Theory of Interaction and the Case of the All-India Muslim League. European Journal of International Relations, 4(2), 178–203.
Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Infantino, F. (2010). La frontière au guichet. Politiques et pratiques des visas Schengen à l’Ambassade et au Consulat d’Italie au Maroc. Champ Pénal, 7, 2–19.
Lin, A. E. (2000). Reform in the Making: The Implementation of Social Policy in Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Polchi, V. (2006, November 12). Caccia al mercato nero dei visti. Repubblica Metropoli.
Roe, E. (1994). Narrative Policy Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Infantino, F. (2019). The National Sense Making of EU Visa Policy. In: Schengen Visa Implementation and Transnational Policymaking . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10647-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10647-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10646-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10647-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)