Abstract
This paper proposes an evaluation and re-reading of the common problems that characterise the difficulties in the practice of protecting and enhancing the territory, with particular focus on the archaeological field. Despite the widespread idea that archaeology should always be included in the territorial project, the link between protection and planning seems to be more evoked and required than programmed and realised. Current solutions define a concept of structured protection for the undifferentiated preservation of goods, where archaeological evidence with different characteristics (position, materiality, collective perception) seems to match univocal and indifferent solutions. This depends, of course, on what is meant to be protected: a single antique object may be subject to simple protection. However, everything is more complicated if the single monument turns out to be an area, an archaeological area, or where the object to be protected is the landscape. First of all, this is so because it is still extremely complicated to give it a unique and shared definition, secondly, because it is a theme that requires a review of the analytical approach, to subordinate it and make it operational on the observation scale. Therefore, this contribution attempts to provide a different approach to territorial analysis and to archaeological and landscape protection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The title of that paper has become: “Fragilità dei forti. Conoscenza, tutela, progetto del paesaggio agrario ‘storico’” (Azzena 2010a).
- 2.
About archaeological parks, see De Caro (2008).
- 3.
Law 8 August 1985, n. 431 (Italian Republic 1985).
- 4.
Indirectly, the starting point for this approach arises, from a helpful lecture by Luca Cerchiai. I obviously take responsibility for this correlation.
- 5.
It is a subject that has always been interesting to me and which I have faced in Azzena (2010b).
- 6.
A further operational update can be found at http://www.landscapefor.eu/home.
- 7.
References
Augè M (2005) Rovine e macerie. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino
Azzena G (2010a) Fragilità dei forti. Conoscenza, tutela, progetto del paesaggio agrario “storico”. In: Bonini G, Brusa A, Cervi R (eds) Il paesaggio agrario italiano protostorico e antico, Storia e didattica, Summer School Emilio Sereni, 1st edn, August 2009. Istituto Alcide Cervi, Reggio Emilia, pp 145–154
Azzena G (2010b) Archeologia no global. La Topografia Antica e i ripensamenti disciplinari. Journal of Ancient Topography (JAT) 19:7–20
Azzena G (2011) History for places/La storia per i luoghi. In: Maciocco G, Sanna G, Serreli S (eds) The urban potential of external territories. Franco Angeli, Milano, pp 194–225
Carpentieri P (2004) La nozione giuridica di paesaggio. Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico. http://www.giustizia-amministrativa.it/documentazione/studi_contributi/Carpentieri4.htm#_ftn1. Accessed 23 Mar 2018
Carta M (2006) L’armatura culturale del territorio. Franco Angeli, Milano
Castelnovi P (1998) Il senso del paesaggio. Relazione introduttiva. In: Il senso del paesaggio, Internatinal meeting, May 1998. Torino, pp 1–22
Choay F (1995) L’allegoria del patrimonio. Officina, Roma
Coburn K (ed) (1957) The notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Routledge & Kegan, London
De Caro S (2008) Ma esistono i parchi archeologici? In: Antichi sotto il cielo del mondo. La gestione dei parchi archeologici: problemi e tendenze. Edizioni dell’Assemblea, Firenze, pp 159–166
Hodder I (1987) The contextual analysis of symbolic meanings. In: Hodder I (ed) The archaeology of contextual meanings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–10
Irti N (2006) Norma e luoghi. Laterza, Roma-Bari
Jacob M (2009) Il paesaggio. Il Mulino, Bologna
Jakob M (2005) Paesaggio e letteratura. Leo S, Olschki, Firenze
Landscapefor (2014) Associazione Landscapefor. Piattaforma del paesaggio utile: per capire dall’esperienza diretta, per nutrire la curiosità e l’attenzione, per partecipare ad azioni sul bene comune. http://www.landscapefor.eu/home
Manieri Elia M (2006) Il polivalente senso del rudere. In: Billeci B, Gizzi S, Scudino D (eds) Il rudere tra conservazione e reintegrazione. Gangemi, Roma, pp 18–160
Predieri A (1981) Paesaggio. In: Enciclopedia del Diritto. Giuffrè, Milano, p 506
Repubblica Italiana (1985) legge 8 agosto 1985, n. 431
Settis S (2010) Paesaggio Costituzione cemento. Einaudi, Torino
Turri E (2002) La conoscenza del territorio. Marsilio, Venezia
Turri E (2006) Il paesaggio come teatro. Marsilio, Venezia
Zagari F (2006) Questo è paesaggio. 48 definizioni. Gruppo Mancosu, Roma
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Azzena, G. (2019). On the Edge of Protection: Archaeology and Territory, Culture and Landscape. In: Obad Šćitaroci, M., Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci, B., Mrđa, A. (eds) Cultural Urban Heritage. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10612-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10612-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-10611-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-10612-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)