Skip to main content

Pathological Analyses of Colorectal Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Emergency Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer

Abstract

About 15–30% of colorectal cancer present as obstruction or perforation in an emergency setting.

Several studies reported a more advanced stage as well as a more aggressive profile compared to the elective cases.

This review focuses on tumor pathology as a basis for different survival outcomes.

In particular the staging categories T, N, and M as well as the non-anatomic, morphological prognostic factors (tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion) and the TNM ancillary R (residual disease) are discussed.

Careful pathological examination is necessary to confirm the clinical presentation (advanced T category, obstruction, perforation) and to correctly assess nodal staging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Puppa G, Sonzogni A, Colombari R, et al. TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134:837–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Puppa G. TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: surgical pathology of the seventh edition. Diagn Histopathol. 2011;17:243–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baer C, Menon R, Bastawrous S, et al. Emergency presentations of colorectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 2017;97:529–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brierley J, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Puppa G, Caneva A, Colombari R, et al. For the sake of clarity about pT4 category of colorectal cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:340–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghazi S, Berg E, Lindblom A, et al. Clinicopathological analysis of colorectal cancer: a comparison between emergency and elective surgical cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wong SK, Jalaludin BB, Morgan MJ, et al. Tumor pathology and long-term survival in emergency colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moreno CC, Mittal PK, Sullivan PS, et al. Colorectal cancer initial diagnosis: screening colonoscopy, diagnostic colonoscopy, or emergent surgery, and tumor stage and size at initial presentation. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016;15:67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan S, Pawlak SE, Eggenberger JC, et al. Acute colonic perforation associated with colorectal cancer. Am Surg. 2001;67:261–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aquina CT, Becerra AZ, Xu Z, et al. Nonelective colon cancer resection: a continued public health concern. Surgery. 2017;161:1609–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Patel SV, Patel SV, Brackstone M. Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer does not result in nodal understaging compared with elective surgery. Can J Surg. 2014;57:349–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pavlidis TE, Marakis G, Ballas K, et al. Does emergency surgery affect resectability of colorectal cancer? Acta Chir Belg. 2008;108:219–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gunnarsson H, Jennische K, Forssell S, et al. Heterogeneity of colon cancer patients reported as emergencies. World J Surg. 2014;38:1819–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McArdle CS, Hole DJ. Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5-year survival. Br J Surg. 2004;91:605–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bass G, Fleming C, Conneely J, et al. Emergency first presentation of colorectal cancer predicts significantly poorer outcomes: a review of 356 consecutive Irish patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:678–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Metcalfe MS, Norwood MG, Miller AS, et al. Unreasonable expectations in emergency colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:275–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bayar B, Yilmaz KB, Akinci M, et al. An evaluation of treatment results of emergency versus elective surgery in colorectal cancer patients. Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2016;32:11–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Puppa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arnoux, G., Vitali, G.C., Puppa, G. (2019). Pathological Analyses of Colorectal Cancer. In: de'Angelis, N., Di Saverio, S., Brunetti, F. (eds) Emergency Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer. Hot Topics in Acute Care Surgery and Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06225-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06225-5_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06224-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06225-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics