Abstract
Arguing that the emergence of new cooperative relations between financial and nonfinancial actors is at the core of the recent rise of finance, this chapter proposes a new perspective on financialization processes that is based on sociological field theory. Golka argues that support from nonfinancial actors such as governments is vital for financial actors seeking to expand the reach of capital to different areas of social life, including social welfare or environmental protection. To understand how such cooperation unfolds—or is contained—Golka traces the development of social impact investing, financial products that aim at the provision of social welfare, through its interaction with British social policy. He argues that investors’ success in forging cooperation hinged upon their abilities to frame financialization as social welfare.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447–465.
Beckert, J. (2003). Economic sociology and embeddedness: How shall we conceptualize economic action? Journal of Economic Issues, 37(3), 769–787.
Belfrage, C. (2008). Towards ‘universal financialisation’ in Sweden? Contemporary Politics, 14(3), 277–296.
Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.
Fligstein, N. (2001b). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forst, R. (2015a). Normativität und Macht. Zur analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 358–379.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns band 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellchaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
JP Morgan. (2014). Spotlight on the market: The impact investor survey. Retrieved from https://thegiin.org/knowledge/publication/spotlight-on-the-market-the-impact-investor-survey
Lazonick, W., & O’Sullivan, M. (2000). Maximizing shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society, 29(1), 13–35.
Martin, J. L. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 1–49.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van der Zwan, N. (2014). Making sense of financialization. Socio-Economic Review, 12(1), 99–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Golka, P. (2019). Introduction. In: Financialization as Welfare. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06100-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06100-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06099-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06100-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)