Skip to main content

Brexit and the UK Parliament: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Brexit and Democracy

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

Abstract

Brexit has been dominating the UK Parliament’s activities as negotiations on the terms of the UK’s departure from the European Union (EU) have been taking place. Parliament is a primary venue for members of Parliament (MPs) to express preferences and attempt to alter the Brexit process. It offers a wide range of opportunities for MPs to voice dissent, signal their preferences and influence the Brexit agenda, especially in light of the government’s minority status. This chapter assesses the role and influence of the UK Parliament vis-à-vis government in the process of the UK leaving the EU. The chapter draws on data collected as part of an Economic and Social Research Council–funded project. We draw on non-attributable interviews with committee clerks and MPs and our own dataset of divisions in select committees, the content of select committee reports, MPs’ positions on the Brexit referendum, MPs’ contributions to debates, parliamentary votes, amendments and other parliamentary activities. We show the extent of Brexit-related parliamentary activity. We examine the role of Parliament in amending Brexit-related legislation, and the role of House of Commons select committees in the Brexit process. We find that while the executive-legislative relationship has not fundamentally changed, divisions within the two largest political parties and the government’s minority status after the 2017 general election have meant the executive has had to make concessions to its own backbench MPs on both sides of the referendum debate, in order to ensure the passage of legislation. Select committees have been influential at times through common themes emerging in some of their reports and their ability to highlight issues not previously on the agenda. Nevertheless, they have also been undermined to some degree by divisions between committees on the Leave-Remain and core-periphery dimensions and within the Brexit committee.

This chapter draws on research funded by an Economic and Social Research Council Brexit Priority Grant (ES/R000646/1)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the government can ultimately override the House of Lords by using the Parliament Act 1949 through which a bill blocked by the Lords in one parliamentary session (normally equivalent to a year) can be re-introduced in the next and passed by the Commons alone.

  2. 2.

    This figure does not include one-off evidence sessions with ministers on the work of their departments.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Whitaker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lynch, P., Whitaker, R., Cygan, A. (2019). Brexit and the UK Parliament: Challenges and Opportunities. In: Christiansen, T., Fromage, D. (eds) Brexit and Democracy. European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06043-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics