Skip to main content

Abstract

Continuous Delivery (CD) and, in general, Continuous Software Engineering (CSE) is becoming the norm. Still, current practices and available integration platforms are too code-oriented. They are not well adapted to work with other, non text-based, software artifacts typically produced during early phases of the software engineering life-cycle. This is especially problematic for teams adopting a Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) approach to software development where several (meta)models (and model transformations) are built and executed as part of the development process. Typically, (part of) the code is automatically generated from such models. Therefore, in a complete CD process, changes in a model should trigger changes on the generated code when appropriate.

A step further would be to apply CD practices to the development of modeling artefacts themselves. Analogously to “traditional” CD, where the goal is to have the mainline codebase always in a deployable state, the aim would be to have the modeling infrastructure always ready to be used. Those models could be the final product themselves or an intermediate artifact in a complete CSE process as described above.

Either way, a tighter integration between CD and MDE would benefit software practitioners by providing them with complete CSE, covering also analysis and design stages of the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://jenkins-ci.org/.

  2. 2.

    https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Git+Plugin.

  3. 3.

    https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Job+DSL+Plugin.

References

  1. https://github.com/jokingarcia/ContinuousEvolution. Accessed 9 July 2018

  2. Ambler, S.W.: Agile software development. In: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, pp. 29–46. Taylor & Francis (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Artač, M., Borovšak, T., Di Nitto, E., Guerriero, M., Tamburri, D.A.: Model-driven continuous deployment for quality DevOps. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality-Aware DevOps (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beck, K., et al.: Manifesto for Agile Software Development (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Wimmer, M.: Model-Driven Software Engineering in Practice. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P.: Interaction Flow Modeling Language. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brosch, P., et al.: Adaptable model versioning in action. In: Modellierung (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Demuth, A., Riedl-Ehrenleitner, M., Lopez-Herrejon, R.E., Egyed, A.: Co-evolution of metamodels and models through consistent change propagation. J. Syst. Softw. 111, 281–297 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Ruscio, D., Lämmel, R., Pierantonio, A.: Automated co-evolution of GMF editor models. In: Malloy, B., Staab, S., van den Brand, M. (eds.) SLE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6563, pp. 143–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19440-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferry, N., Solberg, A.: Models@Runtime for continuous design and deployment. In: Di Nitto, E., Matthews, P., Petcu, D., Solberg, A. (eds.) Model-Driven Development and Operation of Multi-Cloud Applications. SAST, pp. 81–94. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46031-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.-J.: Continuous software engineering: a roadmap and agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 1–14 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. García, J., Diaz, O., Azanza, M.: Model transformation co-evolution: a semi-automatic approach. In: Czarnecki, K., Hedin, G. (eds.) SLE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7745, pp. 144–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36089-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. García-Díaz, V., Espada, J.P., Núñez-Valdéz, E.R., García-Bustelo, B.C.P., Cueva Lovelle, J.M.: Combining the continuous integration practice and the model-driven engineering approach. Comput. Inf. 35, 299–337 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holmes, T., Zdun, U., Dustdar, S.: MORSE: a model-aware service environment. In: 4th IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Humble, J., Farley, D.: Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation. Pearson Education, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koegel, M., Helming, J.: EMFStore: a model repository for EMF models. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: Merging models with the epsilon merging language (EML). In: Nierstrasz, O., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MODELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 215–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11880240_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F., Polack, F.A.C.: A framework for composing modular and interoperable model management tasks. In: MDTPI Workshop (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paige, R.F., Matragkas, N., Rose, L.M.: Evolving models in model-driven engineering: state-of-the-art and future challenges. J. Syst. Softw. 111, 272–280 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sandobalin, J., Insfrán, E., Abrahão, S.: An infrastructure modelling tool for cloud provisioning. In: International Conference on Services Computing, pp. 354–361 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Toulmé, A.: Presentation of EMF compare utility. In: Eclipse Modeling Symposium (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whittle, J., Hutchinson, J., Rouncefield, M.: The state of practice in model-driven engineering. IEEE Softw. 31, 79–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Whittle, J., Hutchinson, J., Rouncefield, M., Burden, H., Heldal, R.: Industrial adoption of model-driven engineering: are the tools really the problem? In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P. (eds.) MODELS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8107, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jokin Garcia or Jordi Cabot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Garcia, J., Cabot, J. (2019). Stepwise Adoption of Continuous Delivery in Model-Driven Engineering. In: Bruel, JM., Mazzara, M., Meyer, B. (eds) Software Engineering Aspects of Continuous Development and New Paradigms of Software Production and Deployment. DEVOPS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11350. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06019-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06019-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-06018-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-06019-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics