Skip to main content

Lecturers’ Perceptions of Virtual Reality as a Teaching and Learning Platform

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICT Education (SACLA 2018)

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) is increasingly being acknowledged as a useful platform for education. In South Africa, however, VR is mainly recognized as an entertainment platform. Hence, the potential benefits of VR and its perceived ease of use within the South African higher education setting have not been widely investigated. Therefore, using the Technology Adoption Model (TAM), this paper investigates the perceived usefulness (PU) and ease of use (PEOU) of VR by lecturers. This paper also identifies the perceived challenges to the adoption of VR as a teaching and learning platform from a higher education perspective, and suggests how those challenges may be overcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Academic ranks in South Africa: ‘junior lecturer’, ‘lecturer’, ‘senior lecturer’, ‘associate professor’, ‘(full) professor’.

References

  1. Abulrub, A.H.G., Attridge, A.N., Williams, M.A.: Virtual reality in engineering education: the future of creative learning. In: 2011 Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, pp. 751–757 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal, R., et al.: Training and simulation for patient safety. BMJ Qual. Saf. 19(Suppl. 2), i34–i43 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayres, K.M., Mechling, L., Sansosti, F.J.: The use of mobile technologies to assist with life skills/independence of students with moderate/severe intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders: considerations for the future of school psychology. Psychol. Schools 50(3), 259–271 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertrand, M., Bouchard, S.: Applying the technology acceptance model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. J. Cyber Ther. Rehab. 1(2), 200–210 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bimber, O., Fröhlich, B., Schmalstieg, D., Encarnacáo, L.M.: The virtual showcase. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Courses, p. 3 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks, B.M., Rose, F.D., Attree, E.A., et al.: An evaluation of the efficacy of training people with learning disabilities in a virtual environment. Disabil. Rehab. 24(11/12), 622–626 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunswick, N., Martin, G.N., Marzano, L.: Visuospatial superiority in developmental dyslexia: myth or reality? Learn. Individ. Differ. 20(5), 421–426 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Champion, E.: Heritage role playing-history as an interactive digital game. In: Proceedings of the Design Thinking Research Symposium, Sydney, p. 29 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chantry, J., Dunford, C.: How do computer assistive technologies enhance participation in childhood occupations for children with multiple and complex disabilities? A review of the current literature. Br. J. Occup. Ther. 73(8), 351–365 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Christopoulos, D., Mavridis, P., Andreadis, A., Karigiannis, J.N.: Using virtual environments to tell the story: the battle of thermopylae. In: VS-GAMES 2011 Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, pp. 84–91 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chuang, W.: Online virtual training environments with intelligent agents to promote social inclusion. Doctoral Dissertation, Nottingham Trent University (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.J.: What are the learning affordances of 3D virtual environments? Br. J. Educ. Tech. 41(1), 10–32 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fagan, M., Kilmon, C., Pandey, V.: Exploring the adoption of a virtual reality simulation: the role of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and personal innovativeness. Campus-Wide Inf. Syst. 29(2), 117–127 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Habib, L., et al.: Dyslexic students in higher education and virtual learning environments: an exploratory study. J. Comp.-Assist. Learn. 28(6), 574–584 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamrol, A., Górski, F., Grajewski, D., Zawadzki, P.: Virtual 3D atlas of a human body: development of an educational medical software application. Proc. Comput. Sci. 25(1), 302–314 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffman, H., Murray, M., Curlee, R., Fritchle, A.: Anatomic visualizeR: teaching and learning anatomy with virtual reality. Inf. Tech. Med. 1, 205–218 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, H.M., Liaw, S.S., Lai, C.M.: Exploring learner acceptance of the use of virtual reality in medical education: a case study of desktop and projection-based display systems. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(1), 3–19 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunter, D., Lastowka, G.: Virtual crimes. New York Law School Law Rev. 49(1), 211–229 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jin, G., Nakayama, S.: Virtual reality game for safety education. In: 2014 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing, ICALIP, pp. 95–100 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kalay, Y.E.: Virtual learning environments. J. Inf. Tech. Constr. 9(13), 195–207 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laister, J., Kober, S.: Social aspects of collaborative learning in virtual learning environments. In: Proceedings of the Networked Learning Conference, Sheffield, pp. 1–7 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lopresti, F.E., Mihailidis, A., Kirsch, N.: Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: state of the art. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 14(1/2), 5–39 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Merchant, Z., Kennicutt, W., Goetz, E.: Predicting undergraduate students’ acceptance of ‘second life’ for teaching chemistry. J. Online Learn. Teach. 11(2), 233–248 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mortara, M., Catalano, C.E., Bellotti, F., Fiucci, G., Houry-Panchetti, M., Petridis, P.: Learning cultural heritage by serious games. J. Cult. Heritage 15(3), 318–325 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Muijs, D., Campbell, J., Kyriakides, L., Robinson, W.: Making the case for differentiated teacher effectiveness: an overview of research in four key areas. School Eff. School Improv. 16(1), 51–70 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Naidoo, S.: Not just fun and games: virtual reality could revolutionize everything from education to shopping (2017). http://www.seamonster.co.za/not-just-fun-games-virtual-reality-could-revolutionise-everything-from-education-to-shopping/

  28. Ng’ambi, D., Gachago, D., Ivala, E., Bozalek, V., Watters, K.: Emerging technologies in South African higher education institutions: towards a teaching and learning practice framework. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, Lisbon, p. 354 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Palter, V.N., Grantcharov, T.P.: Simulation in surgical education. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 182(11), 1191–1196 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pantelidis, V.S.: Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses, and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes Sci. Tech. Educ. 2(1/2), 59–70 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Parsons, S., Cobb, S.: State-of-the-art of virtual reality technologies for children on the autism spectrum. Eur. J. Spec. Needs Educ. 26(3), 355–366 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Parsons, S., Mitchell, P.: The potential of virtual reality in social skills training for people with autistic spectrum disorders. J. Intell. Disabil. Res. 46(5), 430–443 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Parsons, S., Mitchell, P.: What children with autism understand about thoughts and thought bubbles. Autism 3(1), 17–38 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Reznek, M.A., Rawn, C.L., Krummel, T.M.: Evaluation of the educational effectiveness of a virtual reality intravenous insertion simulator. Acad. Emerg. Med. 9(11), 1319–1325 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rigamonti, D.D., Bryant, H.J., Bustos, O., Moore, L., Hoffman, H.M.: Implementing anatomic visualizer learning modules in anatomy education. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Visible Human Project Conference, Maryland (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rizzo, A.A., et al.: The virtual classroom: a virtual reality environment for the assessment and rehabilitation of attention deficits. CyberPsychol. Behav. 3(3), 483–499 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schaub, K.G., et al.: Ergonomic assessment of automotive assembly tasks with digital human modeling and the ‘ergonomics assessment worksheet’ (EAWS). Int. J. Hum. Factors Model. Simul. 3(3/4), 398–426 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith, M.D.: Virtual reality game. U.S. Patent no. 6,159,100 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sobota, B., Korecko, S., Pastornicky, P., Jacho, L.: Virtual-reality technologies in the process of handicapped school children education. In: 2016 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications, ICETA, pp. 321–326 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Standen, P.J., Brown, D.J.: Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of people with intellectual disabilities: review. CyberPsychol. Behav. 8(3), 272–282 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Standen, P.J., Brown, D.J., Cromby, J.J.: The effective use of virtual environments in the education and rehabilitation of students with intellectual disabilities. Br. J. Educ. Tech. 32(3), 289–299 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Winn, W.: A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality. Technnical report TR-93-9, University of Washington (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu, Y., Chan, T., Jong, B., Lin, T.: A web-based virtual reality physics laboratory. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, p. 455 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, K.E., Liu, S.J.: The application of virtual reality technology in physical education teaching and training. In: 2016 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics, SOLI, pp. 245–248 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rushil Raghavjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Solomon, Z., Ajayi, N., Raghavjee, R., Ndayizigamiye, P. (2019). Lecturers’ Perceptions of Virtual Reality as a Teaching and Learning Platform. In: Kabanda, S., Suleman, H., Gruner, S. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 963. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05813-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05813-5_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05812-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05813-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics