Skip to main content

BiH’s Contributions to International Military-Security-Peace Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Foreign Policy Since Independence

Part of the book series: New Perspectives on South-East Europe ((NPSE))

  • 294 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the creation and enactment of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s (BiH) foreign policy role of ‘international security contributor and provider.’ We first describe the adoption of a normative framework and establishment of key institutional actors through international interventionism. We then discuss the horizontal contestation of national roles: interactions between domestic political elites, bureaucratic actors, and international elites, who are key to understanding BiH’s foreign policy behavior regarding international military-security-peace operations. Third, we also reflect on endogenous constraints (finances and foreign policy identity) that impede enactment of national roles. Finally, we argue that this role has been strategically utilized by domestic political elites to achieve their respective political and material goals. However, notwithstanding all the identified constraints, we demonstrate that Bosnian foreign policy agency exists in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is important to clarify that the OHR is mandated with overseeing the implementation of civilian aspects of the Agreement, while in accordance with Annex 1-A of the DPA (Agreement on Military Aspects of the Peace Settlement), NATO has the responsibility for military matters.

  2. 2.

    The term ‘state’ is used to denote central (BiH or national) level of government, in contrast with the entity levels (RS and FBiH).

  3. 3.

    The Presidency selects the Standing Committee’s members. All three members of the Presidency are simultaneously members of the Standing Committee (Presidency 2002).

  4. 4.

    Articles 4a and 4e of the Law on Defense of BiH.

  5. 5.

    Article 84 of the Law on Defense of BiH.

  6. 6.

    Peace support operations and activities are defined as: (1) conflict-prevention operations; (2) peacekeeping operations; (3) peace enforcement, peace implementation and peacebuilding operations; (4) participation in activities of international security and defense organizations to which BiH has acceded; and (5) humanitarian operations (Article 2).

  7. 7.

    General Directions and Priorities of BiH Foreign Policy (Presidency 2003), adopted by the Presidency of BiH in 2003.

  8. 8.

    This number dropped from 16,000 (10,000 professional soldiers, 5000 reserve forces, and 1000 civilian employees) members of the AF as determined in a series of the BiH Presidency’s Decisions on Size, Structure and Locations of the AFBiH, starting in 2006.

  9. 9.

    Article 6 of the Law on Participation in Peace Operations.

  10. 10.

    Within the Ministry’s organizational structure, the Department for International Cooperation monitors BiH international defense obligations and agreements, and coordinates international military representation and assignments (Ministry of Defense 2017b).

  11. 11.

    The Ministry of Security has been regarded as the key champion of supporting international peace operations within the BiH government (Hadžović 2015); the Ministry of Defense performs the majority of tasks related to deployments to these operations, whereas the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is inadequately involved in this process (Kožljak A., personal communication, June 2018).

  12. 12.

    The joint AF were established after the reform of the defense system and transfer of defense competencies from the entity to the state level (Koneska 2014; Kazazić 2007). The reform went through couple of consecutive steps of ‘state- and institution-building,’ mostly performed by the international community, which pursued its own goals, via NATO, OSCE, the EU Delegation, or the OHR.

  13. 13.

    In 2006, BiH became a member of NATO’s military-political program Partnership for Peace (Presidency 2006).

  14. 14.

    See, for instance, the recent Resolution on the Protection of Constitutional Framework and Proclamation of the Military Neutrality of the Entity of Republika Srpska of 18 October 2017, adopted in the RS National Assembly without participation of the opposition parties.

  15. 15.

    The policy of demilitarization still has many supporters in the RS. Bosnian Serbs fear that the numerically stronger Bosniaks will dominate in BiH and therefore threaten the existence of the RS entity (Gaub 2011).

  16. 16.

    Bosniak leadership is categorically opposed to demilitarization and decreases in the AF, since they view it as one of the (few) ‘fundamental pillars of the state.’ Croat leadership, like in the most other internal situations, does not openly address this issue and exploits the situation to achieve other political ends.

  17. 17.

    The majority of the international community, with the notable exception of Russia, fully supports NATO membership of BiH (Turčalo and Kapidžić 2014). From important neighboring countries, Croatia’s attitude toward BiH’s NATO membership is positive, while Serbia’s is rather inconclusive (Preljević 2017, 48–52).

  18. 18.

    As determined by Article 25 of the Law on Participation in Peace Operations.

  19. 19.

    The budget of the Ministry of Defense for 2017 was approximately €150,000,000 (Parliamentary Assembly 2016b) and has declined steadily over the last five years (Hadžović 2015).

  20. 20.

    Bosnian soldiers publicly complain they are less equipped than their counterparts from other countries participating in international peace and security operations (Slobodna Evropa 2015).

  21. 21.

    Illustrative of this would be the dire domestic living and working conditions of the AF. The Parliamentary Military Commissioner frequently warns that the BiH military lacks food, hygiene products, clean, and adequate premises.

  22. 22.

    Some research by psychologists working with returnees from international peace missions highlighted the potential of international peacekeeping for fostering bridging social capital in the AF (Centre for Security Studies 2017a).

  23. 23.

    As succinctly put by the Head of the BiH AF Joint Staff: ‘risks associated with participation in international peace operations were [regularly] assessed as acceptable, since non-participation would be a far greater risk for the country’s Euro-Atlantic future’ (Ministry of Defense 2015b). Similarly, the national political and military leadership repeatedly stated that negative effects associated with participation in certain peace operations would not influence the AF’s deployments (Nezavisne 2015; Slobodna Evropa 2015).

  24. 24.

    More specifically, it is argued that BiH does not rely enough on its contributions to international peace missions to boost its economic, political, and social development. For instance, irrespective of the country in which Bosnian military or political forces have been deployed, there has been no discernable advancement or improvement of Bosnian foreign policy interests, despite the occasional high-level visits and bilateral meetings in the framework of a particular peace mission (Turković B., personal communication, November 2017).

  25. 25.

    From UNPROFOR employed on BiH territory during the war, to NATO-led Peace Implementation Force (IFOR) equipped with an UN mandate, with 60,000 personnel and present until 1996, and Stabilization Force (SFOR) present until 2004, after which the security mandate has been transferred (and is extended annually) by the UN Security Council to the still-present EU mission (Ministry of Defense 2005; Gaub 2011, 86). EUFOR Althea military operation employs more than 600 soldiers on the field, plus the reserve troops. It is ‘focused on capacity-building and training of the AF’ in order to develop their operational capabilities for deployment in international peace support operations, as well as ‘retaining deterrence capacity to support a safe and secure environment’ in BiH (European Commission 2016, 76).

  26. 26.

    The full list of international peace-security-military operations in which BiH representatives participated is as follows: (1) NATO operations: Operation ‘Iraqi Freedom’ (‘Enduring Freedom’), ISAF Operation in Afghanistan, and Operation Resolute Support in Afghanistan; (2) UN peace support operations, in which (2a) BiH police officers participated: Peace mission in Liberia (UNMIL), Peace missions in Sudan (UNMIS), South Sudan (UNMISS) and Abyei (UNISFA), Peace mission in Cyprus (UNFICYP), Peace mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH), Peace mission in East Timor (UNMISET); in which (2b) BiH AF participated: Peace mission in Democratic Republic of Congo (MONUC/MONUSCO), Peace mission in Eritrea and Ethiopia (UNMEE), Peace mission in Mali (MINUSMA) and Peace mission in the Central African Republic (MINUSCA); (3) EU operations: European Union Training Mission in Republic of Central Africa (Ministry of Defense 2015a; Ministry of Defense 2017a; Ministry of Security 2017; NATO 2017; EUTM RCA 2017). BiH police officers in UN peace support operations join the UN police forces (‘UNPOL’), whereas members of BiH AF act as military observers. Their mandate generally includes: supporting implementation of peace treaties, supporting local governments in conducting security reform, civilian protection, organization of training for local police officers, maintaining the rule of law, public order, and internal security, promoting political processes and protection of human rights, supporting country’s reconstruction and renovation, and so on. Mandate of BiH police officers and soldiers in NATO missions includes operative, administrative, and other headquarter activities, securing allied camp bases and ensuring logistics, and training and advising local security forces (Omanović 2010; Presidency 2015b; Parliamentary Assembly 2015a; Parliamentary Assembly 2015c; Ministry of Security 2017; Ministry of Defense 2017a).

  27. 27.

    The Framework Agreement was ratified and entered into force in 2016.

  28. 28.

    For example, Article 7(b) of the Ministry of Security’s Regulation on the Procedure for Sending Abroad Members of BiH Police Forces to Operations for Support of Peace states that ‘the selection of members of the BiH police forces for participation in peacekeeping missions […] takes into account the expertise and experience, national, regional, and gender balance […].’ Also, the Ministry of Security adopted various affirmative measures to increase participation of women in peace missions, for example, ‘decreasing necessary years of work experience as one of the main criteria for application for participation in selection process for deployment to peace missions, from 8 to 5 years for women.’ Women are likewise regularly appointed to commanding and other managerial positions within the BiH contingents in peace missions (Gender Equality Agency 2013, 14–16, 20).

  29. 29.

    Security Council resolutions 1325 (2000), 1820 (2008), 1888 (2009), 1889 (2009), 1960 (2010), 2106 (2013), 2122 (2013), 2242 (2015). This is especially important in conflict areas where women are in extremely vulnerable position, being sexually exploited or raped as war victims, so in these situations the UN missions need women as advisors to local police and security authorities (Centre for Security Studies 2017b).

  30. 30.

    The Vancouver Principles were launched on the margins of the UN Peacekeeping Defense Ministerial conference in November 2017. They contain a set of political commitments made by member states regarding training, planning, and the conduct and care of their own forces participating in peacekeeping operations.

  31. 31.

    For a similar conclusion on the political situation in the country in general, its international behavior and specifically the AF’s functioning, see Gaub (2011).

References

  • Ankersen, C. (2014). The politics of civil-military cooperation. Canada in Bosnia, Kosovo, and Afghanistan. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banning, T. (2014). The “Bonn powers” of the high representative in Bosnia Herzegovina: Tracing a legal figment. Goettingen Journal of International Law, 6(2), 259–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • BN Televizija. (2016, February 23). Interview with Dušanka Majkić.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brljavac, B. (2012). Building a common state army forces in post-war Bosnia and Herzegovina: Assessing its peace-building perspective. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 12(1), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantir, C., & Kaarbo, J. (2016). Unpacking Ego in role theory. Vertical and horizontal role contestation and foreign policy. In C. Cantir & J. Kaarbo (Eds.), Domestic role contestation, foreign policy, and international relations (pp. 1–22). New York/London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Security Studies. (2017a, December). (STEP) Vesna Ležaja: ‘Imamo razvijen program psihološke podrške porodicama pripadnika MO/OS BiH koji učestvuju u mirovnim misijama’ [(STEP) Vesna Ležaja: ‘We have a developed programme of psychological support to families of members of MoD/AF BiH who participate in peace missions’]. http://css.ba/vesna-lezaja/. Accessed 22 Dec 2017.

  • Centre for Security Studies. (2017b, December). (STEP) Maja Gačić: ‘Odlazak u mirovnu misiju je bila dobra odluka’ [(STEP) Maja Gačić: ‘Going to peace mission was good decision’]. http://css.ba/step-maja-gacic/. Accessed 22 Dec 2017.

  • Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (1995). The office of the high representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina. http://www.ohr.int/?page_id=68220. Accessed 11 Aug 2017.

  • Dnevni avaz. (2016, June 9). Interview with Marina Pendeš. http://avaz.ba/vijesti/240532/ispraceno-45-vojnika-os-bih-koji-idu-u-mirovnu-misiju-u-afganistan. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.

  • Emert, R. (2005, May 26). First Bosnian unit to deploy outside country is heading to Iraq. Stars and Stripes. https://www.stripes.com/news/first-bosnian-unit-to-deploy-outside-country-is-heading-to-iraq-1.33851#.WY3BZ1FJbIU. Accessed 13 Aug 2017.

  • Europa.eu. (2015, August 15). European Union External Action: EU – Bosnia-Herzegovina sign agreement on participation in crisis management operations. https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/6028_en. Accessed 3 Sept 2017.

  • European Commission. (2016, November 9). Commission Staff Working Document. Bosnia and Herzegovina 2016 Report SWD(2016) 365 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUTM RCA (European Union Training Mission in Republic of Central Africa). (2017, October 14). Press and Public Information. Email correspondence with Comandante (OF-3) Gustavo Zapatero, Camp Moana, UCATEX. Bangui.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garić, N., & Župac, G. (2015). Učešće Bosne i Hercegovine u zajedničkoj bezbednosnoj i odbrambenoj politici EU – Mogućnosti regionalne saradnje. Vojno delo, 67(3), 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaub, F. (2011). Military integration after civil wars. Multiethnic armies, identity and post-conflict reconstruction. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gender Equality Agency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2013, December). Action plan for implementation of UNSCR 1325 in Bosnia and Herzegovina for the period 2014–2017. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadžović, D. (2015, December). Contributor profile: Bosnia and Herzegovina. Providing for Peacekeeping – Country profiles. http://www.providingforpeacekeeping.org/profiles/. Accessed 28 July 2017.

  • International Peace Institute. IPI peacekeeping database. http://www.providingforpeacekeeping.org/. Accessed 2 Oct 2017.

  • Interview with Ambassador at Large Bisera Turković. 2017, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview with BiH Ambassador to the USA Haris Hrle. 2017, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview with Alija Kožljak, Head of the Military Section at BiH Mission to NATO. 2018, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaarbo, J., & Cantir, C. (2016). Agents in structures. Insights from cases of internal role contestation. In C. Cantir & J. Kaarbo (Eds.), Domestic role contestation, foreign policy, and international relations (pp. 174–192). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazazić, V. (2007). Bosnia and Herzegovina and NATO. Adrias: zbornik Zavoda za znanstveni i umjetnički rad Hrvatske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti u Splitu, 14, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koneska, C. (2014). After ethnic conflict. Policy-making in post-conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina and Macedonia. Surrey/Burlington: Routledge/Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2005, June). White Paper on the Defense of BiH. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2015a, August). Brošura Ministarstva obrane i Oružanih snaga BiH [Brochure of the Ministry of Defense and BiH Armed Forces]. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2015b, December 1). Intervju ‘Mi smo dio kolektivne sigurnosti u svijetu’ general-pukovnik Anto Jeleč [Interview ‘We are a part of the collective security in the world’ lieutenant general Anto Jeleč]. http://os.mod.gov.ba/os-bih-u-misiji-podrske-miru/Intervju/default.aspx?id=91&langTag=hr-HR&template_id=181&pageIndex=1. Accessed 27 Aug 2017.

  • Ministry of Defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2017a, October 10). Decision on granting access to information on participation of BiH representatives in international peace missions. UP-I-14-35-2-15-6/17. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2017b). http://www.mod.gov.ba. Accessed 22 Aug 2017.

  • Ministry of Defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2017c, June 14). Working program of the BiH Ministry of Defense for 2018 – Preliminary Draft. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2017d). Military doctrine of the BiH Armed Forces, Chapter 4.3 ‘Participation in Peace Operations (Peace Support Operations – PSO)’. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2018, January). Bosnia and Herzegovina – NATO MAP activation. Internal working document (on file with authors).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Security of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2017, December 11). Decision on delivering information on participation of BiH representatives in international peace missions. No. 05-14-10-8934-1/17. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. NATO and Afghanistan: Resolute Support Mission (RSM) Placemats Archive. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/107995.htm. Accessed 23 Aug 2017.

  • Nezavisne. (2015, December 8). Teroristički napad u Rajlovcu finansiran iz inostranstva? [Terrorist attack in Rajlovac financed from aboard?]. http://www.nezavisne.com/novosti/bih/Teroristicki-napad-u-Rajlovcu-finansiran-iz-inostranstva/341022. Accessed 23 Oct 2017.

  • Novo Vrijeme. (2015, January 18). Učešće u međunarodnim mirovnim misijama popravlja imidž BiH u svijetu [Participation in international peace missions improves BiH’s image in the world]. http://novovrijeme.ba/ucesce-u-medjunarodnim-mirovnim-misijama-popravlja-imidz-bih-u-svijetu/. Accessed 27 Dec 2017.

  • Omanović, S. (2010). Bosna i Hercegovina i NATO [Bosnia and Herzegovina and NATO]. Sarajevo: Atlantic Initiative, Association for Promotion of Euro-Atlantic Integration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2005a). Law on Defense of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Official Gazette No. 88/05. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2005b). Law on participation of members of the Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina, police officials, state officials and other [public] employees in operations for support of peace and other activities abroad. Official Gazette No. 14/05. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2015a, January 5). Izvještaj o učešću pripadnika Oružanih snaga Bosne i Hercegovine i policijskih službenika u operacijama podrške miru [Report on participation of members of the BiH Armed Forces and police officers in peace support operations]. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2015b, April 8). Odluka o potvrđivanju Odluke Predsjedništva Bosne i Hercegovine o učešću grupe podoficira Oružanih snaga Bosne i Hercegovine u operaciji podrške miru Odlučna podrška u Islamskoj Republici Afganistan [Decision on confirming decision of the BiH Presidency on participation of a group of non-commissioned officers of the BiH Armed Forces in peace support operation Resolute Support in Islamic Republic of Afghanistan]. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2015c, August 10). Izvještaj o učešću pripadnika Oružanih snaga Bosne i Hercegovine i policijskih službenika u operacijama podrške miru u periodu od 1. jula do 31. decembra 2014. godine [Report on participation of members of the BiH Armed Forces and police officers in peace support operations in the period between 1 July and 31 December 2014]. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2016a). Framework agreement between Bosnia and Herzegovina and the European Union on the participation in EU-led crisis management operations. Official Gazette – International treaties No. 2/16. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2016b). Law on budget of institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Bosnia and Herzegovina’s International Obligations for 2017. Official Gazette No. 94/16. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peace Support Operations Training Centre (PSOTC). http://www.psotc.org. Accessed 22 Aug 2017.

  • Preljević, H. (2017). UNsatisfied? The rocky path to NATO membership – Bosnia and Herzegovina: A new approach in understanding the challenges. Croatian International Relations Review, 23(80), 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2002). Decision on organization and work of defense institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2003). General guidelines and priorities for implementation of foreign policy of Bosnia and Herzegovina. No. 01-645-30/03. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2005). Decision on commitment to NATO membership. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2006). Decision on acceptance of the Framework Document of the NATO program ‘Partnership for Peace’. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2012, January 9). Odluka o učešću policijskih službenika iz Bosne i Hercegovine u transformisanoj UNMIS misiji (Sudan), UNMISS (Južni Sudan) i UNISFA (Abyei) [Decision on participation of BiH police officers in transformed UNMIS mission (Sudan), UNMISS (South Sudan) and UNISFA (Abeyi)]. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2015a, February 11). Odluka o učešću grupe podoficira Oružanih snaga Bosne i Hercegovine u operaciji podrške miru Odlučna podrška (Resolute Support Mission) u Islamskoj Republici Afganistan [Decision on participation of a group of non-commissioned officers of the BiH Armed Forces in peace support operation Resolute Support Mission in Islamic Republic of Afghanistan]. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2015b, November 20). Odluka o učešću policijskih službenika iz Bosne i Hercegovine u mirovnoj misiji Ujedinjenih naroda na Haitiju – MINUSTAH [Decision on participation of police officers from Bosnia and Herzegovina in the UN peace mission in Haiti – MINUSTAH]. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2017, June 20). Press release: BiH delegation, led by the chair of the Presidency of BiH dr. Mladen Ivanić, met today in Bruxelles with the North-Atlantic Council at the level of permanent representatives. http://www.predsjednistvobih.ba/saop/default.aspx?id=76189&langTag=bs-BA. Accessed 17 Dec 2017.

  • Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2018). Foreign policy strategy of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2018–2023. No. 01-50-1-936-27-1/18. Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seroka, M. (2016, September 30). The Serbian referendum in Bosnia and Herzegovina. EURACTIV. https://www.euractiv.com/section/enlargement/opinion/the-serbian-referendum-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina/. Accessed 14 Sept 2017.

  • Slobodna Evropa. (2015, December 11). OS BiH u misiji u Afganistanu: Snaga koja doprinosi sigurnosti [BiH Armed Forces in the mission in Afghanistan: Force that contributes to security]. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/os-bih-u-misiji-u-afganistanu-snaga-koja-doprinosi-sigurnosti/27421509.html. Accessed 24 Oct 2017.

  • Turčalo, S., & Kapidžić, D. (2014). NATO integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina: The pursuit of local ownership in externally-led state building. Croatian International Relations Review, 20(71), 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. Security Council resolutions. http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/issues/women/wps.shtml. Accessed 21 Sept 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davor Petrić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Domi, T.L., Petrić, D. (2019). BiH’s Contributions to International Military-Security-Peace Operations. In: Hasić, J., Karabegović, D. (eds) Bosnia and Herzegovina’s Foreign Policy Since Independence. New Perspectives on South-East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05654-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics