Skip to main content

Errors in Imaging of the Acute Female Pelvis: Where Do They Occur and How Can We Reduce Them?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 789 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter outlines issues which can lead to errors in pelvic imaging, specifically in women. This includes common pelvic diagnoses which can have variable imaging appearances, as well as less common, but clinically significant pathologic conditions. The best imaging modality for each condition, depending on the clinical history provided, will be reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pope A. Phrases, saying, proverbs and idioms at The Phrase Finder. 2018. https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/to-err-is-human.html. Accessed 5 Jun 2018.

  2. Brook OR, O’Connell AM, Thornton E, et al. Quality initiatives: anatomy and pathophysiology of errors occurring in clinical radiology practice. Radiographics. 2010;30(5):1401–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. National Academies Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glanc P, O'Hayon BE, Singh DK, Bokhari SA, Maxwell CV. Challenges of pelvic imaging in obese women. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):1839–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruno MA, Walker EA, Abujudeh HH. Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics. 2015;35(6):1668–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhosale PR, Javitt MC, Atri M, Harris RD, Kang SK, Meyer BJ, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria(R) acute pelvic pain in the reproductive age group. Ultrasound Q. 2016;32(2):108–15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang HC, Bhatt S, Dogra VS. Pearls and pitfalls in diagnosis of ovarian torsion. Radiographics. 2008;28(5):1355–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dormagen JB, Gaarder M, Drolsum A. Standardized cine-loop documentation in abdominal ultrasound facilitates offline image interpretation. Acta Radiol. 2015;56(1):3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson W, Taylor MB, Carrington BM, et al. The value of hyoscine butylbromide in pelvic. MRI Clin Radiol. 2007;62(11):1087–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marcal LP, Fox PS, Evans DB, et al. Analysis of free-form radiology dictations for completeness and clarity for pancreatic cancer staging. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(7):2391–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen JW, Boomer L, Kurtovic K, et al. Reducing computed tomography scans for appendicitis by introduction of a standardized and validated ultrasonography report template. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(1):144–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, et al. Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology. 2013;267(1):240–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levine D, Brown DL, Andreotti RF, et al. Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Statement. Radiology. 2010;256(3):943–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sparic R, Mirkovic L, Malvasi A, et al. Epidemiology of uterine myomas: a review. Int J Fertil Steril. 2016;9(4):424–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim H-G, Song YJ, Na YJ, et al. A case of torsion of a subserosal leiomyoma. J Menopausal Med. 2013;19(3):147–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanos V, Berry KE. Benign and malignant pathology of the uterus. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;46:12–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, et al. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):761–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawada M, Kakigano A, Matsuzaki S, et al. Obstetric outcome in patients with a unicornuate uterus after laparoscopic resection of a rudimentary horn. J Obstetr Gyaenecol Res. 2018;44(6):1080–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukunaga T, Fujii S, Inoue C, et al. The spectrum of imaging appearances of mullerian duct anomalies: focus on MR imaging. Jpn J Radiol. 2017;35(12):697–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Caserta D, Mallozzi M, Meldolesi C, et al. Pregnancy in a unicornuate uterus: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2014;8:130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghi T, De Musso F, Maroni E, et al. The pregnancy outcome in women with incidental diagnosis of septate uterus at first trimester scan. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(9):2671–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baker ME, Rendon NC, Rosen MO et al (2013) .ACR. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69468/Narrative. Accessed June 5 2018.

  23. Williams PL, Laifer-Narin SL, Ragavendra N. US of abnormal uterine bleeding. Radiographics. 2003;23(3):703–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dubinsky TJ. Value of sonography in the diagnosis of abnormal vaginal bleeding. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;32(7):348–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolfman W, Leyland N, Heywood M, et al. Asymptomatic endometrial thickening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32(10):990–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuligowska E, Deeds L, Lu K. Pelvic pain: overlooked and underdiagnosed gynecologic conditions. Radiographics. 2005;25(1):3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Minguez JA, et al. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in uterosacral ligaments, rectovaginal septum, vagina and bladder: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(5):534–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Romosan G, Bjartling C, Skoog L, et al. Ultrasound for diagnosing acute salpingitis: a prospective observational diagnostic examination. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1569–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pavlik EJ, DePriest PD, Gallion HH, et al. Ovarian volume related to age. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;77(3):410–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dhanda S, Quek ST, Ting MY, et al. CT features in surgically proven cases of ovarian torsion-a pictorial review. Br J Radiol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170052.

  31. Rha SE, Byun JY, al JSE. CT and MR imaging features of adnexal torsion. Radiographics. 2002;22(2):283–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Indran IR, Huang Z, Khin LW, et al. Simplified 4-item criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: a bridge too far? Clin Endocrinol. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13755.

  33. Nastri CO, Teixeira DM, Moroni RM. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology, staging, prediction and prevention. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(4):377–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Corwin MT, Gerscovich EO, Lamba R, et al. Differentiation of ovarian endometriomas from hemorrhagic cysts at MR imaging: utility of the T2 dark spot sign. Radiology. 2014;271(1):126–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Glastonbury CM. The shading sign. Radiology. 2002;224(1):199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Spain J, Rheinboldt M. MDCT of pelvic inflammatory disease: a review of the pathophysiology, gamut of imaging findings, and treatment. Emerg Radiol. 2017;24(1):87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Revzin MV, Mathur M, Dave HB. Pelvic inflammatory disease: multimodality imaging approach with clinical-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2016;36(5):1579–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Iraha Y, Okada M, Iraha R, et al. CT and MR imaging of gynecologic emergencies. Radiographics. 2017;37(5):1569–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wiesenfeld HC, Hillier SL, Meyn LA, et al. Subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(1):37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tay JI, Moore J, Walker JJ. Ectopic pregnancy. West J Med. 2000;173(2):131–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bickhaus J, Perry E, Schust DJ. Re-examining sonographic cut-off values for diagnosing early pregnancy loss. Gynecol Obstet. 2013;3(1):141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mj G, Rajan R. Heterotopic pregnancy in natural conception. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2008;1(1):37–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ramanathan S, Raghu V, Ladumor SB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of common, uncommon, and rare implantation sites in ectopic pregnancy. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43(12):3425–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hirakawa M, Tajima T, Yoshimitsu K, et al. Uterine artery embolization along with the administration of methotrexate for cervical ectopic pregnancy: technical and clinical outcomes. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(6):1601–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gunbey HP, Sayit AT, Idilman IS, et al. Migration of intrauterine devices with radiological findings: report on two cases. BMJ Case Reports. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-202522.

  46. Vandermeer FQ, Wong-You-Cheong JJ. Imaging of acute pelvic pain. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(1):2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Boyd CA, Riall TS. Unexpected gynecological findings during abdominal surgery. Curr Probl Surg. 2012;49(4):195–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Torky HA. Huge nabothian cyst causing hematometra (case report). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;207:238–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Umesaki N, Nakai Y, Honda K, et al. Power Doppler findings of adenoma malignum of uterine cervix. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 1998;45(3):213–2116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Jayaprakash S, Lakshimidevi M, Kumar GS. A rare case of posterior vaginal wall cyst. BMJ Case Reports. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr.02.2011.3804.

  51. Tiwari U, Relia N, Shailesh F, et al. Gartner duct cyst: CT and MRI findings. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(Suppl 1):150–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Chaudhari VV, Patel MK, Douek M, et al. MR imaging and US of female urethral and periurethral disease. Radiographics. 2010;30(7):1857–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kielar, A.Z., Duigenan, S., Wolfman, D.J. (2019). Errors in Imaging of the Acute Female Pelvis: Where Do They Occur and How Can We Reduce Them?. In: Patlas, M., Katz, D., Scaglione, M. (eds) Errors in Emergency and Trauma Radiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05548-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05548-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05547-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05548-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics