Skip to main content

Interaction Effects of Yard Block Properties, Re-marshalling and TAS

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Container Handling in Automated Yard Blocks

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 524 Accesses

Abstract

In order to evaluate the effectiveness of re-marshalling and the Terminal Appointment System thoroughly, the impact of both is examined with a selective variation of yard block properties which are deemed to be central for the understanding of the interaction of yard block properties, re-marshalling and Terminal Appointment Systems. The aim is to eliminate any biased behaviour of the algorithm or performance enhancements through the Terminal Appointment System by certain combinations of yard block settings. For this purpose, the influences of two block parameters, are examined in this chapter. Namely, the average block occupancy influences the number of re-handling moves that can be performed in the block. Generally, it is more difficult to re-handle containers in densely filled blocks. Even in cases of a high quantity of precise arrival information, re-handling is impeded by a limited number of available empty slots. Hence, it is worthwhile to analyse how densely filled the block can be stacked while it remains possible to benefit from implementing and operating Terminal Appointment Systems. Next, it makes naturally no sense to operate the Terminal Appointment System if the considered yard block is a pure transshipment block with no external trucks arriving at its handover area. Therefore, it is important to identify the threshold for the transshipment rate of a yard block at which imprecise or unknown arrival information of trucks at the handover areas considerably impact the productivity of the yard block. The empirical study is conducted by simulation based on a rigorous experimental design and statistical evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The experimental results are presented as data points while a dashed line connects the points in order to group them according to their tier and algorithm category for the purpose of visualisation. In this respect, the dashed lines do not reflect an interpolation of the results.

  2. 2.

    For the reason of comparing three algorithms with six different parameter levels, it is impractical to visualise the results of all individual runs simultaneously for all RMGC-systems in one diagram. For the same reasons of clarity and comprehensibility, only the mean values over ten runs are presented in the diagrams.

  3. 3.

    For the reasons behind the performance discrepancy with regard to re-handling moves and vehicle waiting times, it is referred to the discussion of this effect in Sect. 7.6.

  4. 4.

    Remember that, according to the rational of the FCQ, it is indirectly tried to separate containers with available retrieval information (belonging to subset C sl) from containers without retrieval information (belonging to subset C dw) as explained in Sect. 7.4.4.

  5. 5.

    The experimental results are presented as data points while a dashed line connects the points in order to group them according to their tier and algorithm category for the purpose of visualisation. In this respect, the dashed lines do not reflect an interpolation of the results.

  6. 6.

    For the reason of comparing two algorithms with ten different parameter levels, it is impractical to visualise the results of all individual runs simultaneously for all RMGC-systems in one diagram. For the same reasons of clarity and comprehensibility, only the mean values over ten runs are presented in the diagrams.

  7. 7.

    Note that the total number of containers in the block during the planning horizon stays also unaffected by the transshipment rate. The latter only changes the distribution of container properties and not their quantity (Kemme 2013).

References

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57(1):289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemme N (2012) Effects of storage block layout and automated yard crane systems on the performance of seaport container terminals. OR Spectr 34(3):563–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemme N (2013) Design and operation of automated container storage systems. Contributions to management science, 1st edn. Physica, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30(1–2):81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1(6):80–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Covic, F. (2019). Interaction Effects of Yard Block Properties, Re-marshalling and TAS. In: Container Handling in Automated Yard Blocks. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05291-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics