Skip to main content

Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy and Ileoanal J Pouch Anastomosis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery: Vol.1, Laparoscopic procedures

Part of the book series: Springer Surgery Atlas Series ((SPRISURGERY))

  • 1397 Accesses

Abstract

The ileoanal pouch procedure is a surgical technique that restores gastrointestinal continuity after surgical removal of the colon and rectum. The most common surgical indications that require the removal of the entire colon and rectum are ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Much less commonly, it may also be performed for patients with multiple synchronous or metachronous colorectal cancers or functional disorders of the bowel (Fazio et al., Ann Surg 230:575, 1999).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fazio V, O’Riordain MG, Lavery IC, Church JM, Lau P, Strong SA, Hull T. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 1999;230:575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuruvilla K, Osler T, Hyman N. A comparison of the quality of life of ulcerative colitis patients after IPAA vs ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:1131–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fazio V, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC, Manilich E, Connor J, et al. Quantification of risk for pouch failure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg. 2003;238:605–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiely J, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, Shen B, Kiran RP, et al. Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(4):387–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindsey I, George BD, Kettlewell MG, Mortensen NJ. Impotence after mesorectal and close rectal dissection for inflammatory bowel disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:831–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirat H, Remzi F. Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23:239–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh P, Bhangu A, Nicholls RJ, Tekkis P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open restorative proctocolectomy. Color Dis. 2013;15:340–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. White I, Jenkins JT, Coomber R, Clark SK, Phillips RK, Kennedy RH. Outcomes of laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1160–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmed Ali U, Keus F, Heikens JT, Bemelman WA, Berdah SV, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD006267.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benlice C, Stocchi L, Costedio M, Gorgun E, Hull T, Kessler H, Remzi FH. Laparoscopic IPAA is not associated with decreased rates of incisional hernia and small-bowel obstruction when compared with open technique: long-term follow-up of a case-matched study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:314–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, van Duijvendijk P, Gouma DJ. Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1800–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartels S, DʼHoore A, Cuesta MA, Bensdorp AJ, Lucas C, Bemelman WA. Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg. 2012;256:1045–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L, Birnbaum D, Lefevre JH, Berdah S, Panis Y. A total laparoscopic approach reduces the infertility rate after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a 2-center study. Ann Surg. 2013;258:275–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weston-Petrides G, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Nicholls RJ, Mortensen NJ, et al. Comparison of outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy with or without defunctioning ileostomy. Arch Surg. 2008;143:406–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oresland T, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Akervall S, Hultén L. Pouch size: the important functional determinant after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 1990;77:265–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koh, C.E., Solomon, M.J. (2019). Laparoscopic Proctocolectomy and Ileoanal J Pouch Anastomosis. In: Parker, M., Hohenberger, W. (eds) Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery: Vol.1, Laparoscopic procedures. Springer Surgery Atlas Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05240-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05240-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-05239-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-05240-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics