Abstract
Our culture is challenged by the ethics and practicality of assessing and intervening with sex offenders in general, and these challenges are compounded when the offender has an intellectually disability (ID). Most commonly, offenders with ID are adjudicated incompetent to stand trial and, therefore, are not convicted of the crime (in a sense, then, offender may not even be the correct term, but it is used here to conform with common usage). The treatment of offenders with ID presents a unique challenge because on the one hand it is incumbent upon professionals to protect members of the community at large but on the other hand the individual with ID is afforded basic human rights, which may include freedom of movement within the community at large. In this chapter we focus primarily on individuals with ID who are presumed (or known) to have offended toward children. We will first cover historical and contemporary approaches to assessment and treatment. Next, we will describe specific ethical issues that arise in working with the ID population. Finally, we will present some proposed future directions for work in the area of sex offenders with ID.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
Armstrong, G. S., & Freeman, B. C. (2011). Examining GPS monitoring alerts triggered by sex offenders: The divergence of legislative goals and practical application in community corrections. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 175–182.
Bannerman, D. J., Sheldon, J. B., Sherman, J. A., & Harchik, A. E. (1990). Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: The rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23(1), 79–89.
Barbaree, H. E. and Marshall, W. L. (1988), Deviant sexual arousal, offense history, and demographic variables as predictors of reoffense among child molesters. Behav. Sci. Law, 6: 267-280. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370060209
Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (1998). Treatment of the sexual offender. In R. M. Wettstein (Ed.), Treatment of offenders with mental disorders (pp. 265–328). New York: Guilford Press.
Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2016). Professional and ethical compliance code for behavior analysts. Retrieved from http://bacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/160321-compliance-code-english.pdf
Callahan, E. J., & Leitenberg, H. (1973). Aversion therapy for sexual deviation: Contingent shock and covert sensitization. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81(1), 60–73.
Camilleri, J. A., & Quinsey, V. L. (2011). Appraising the risk of sexual and violent recidivism among intellectually disabled offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 59–74.
Conrad, S. R., & Wincze, J. P. (1976). Orgasmic reconditioning: A controlled study of its effects upon the sexual arousal and behavior of adult male homosexuals. Behavior Therapy, 7(2), 155–166.
Day, K. (1994). Male mentally handicapped sex offenders. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 165(5), 630–639.
Dennis, E., Rouleau, J., Renaud, P., Nolet, K., & Saumur, C. (2014). A pilot development of virtual stimuli depicting affective dispositions for penile plethysmography assessment of sex offenders. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 23(3), 200–208.
Earls, C. M., & Castonguay, L. G. (1989). The evaluation of olfactory aversion for a bisexual pedophile with a single-case multiple baseline design. Behavior Therapy, 20(1), 137–146.
Fernandez, Y. M., Shingler, J., & Marshall, W. L. (2006). Putting ‘behavior’ back into the cognitive-behavioral treatment of sexual offenders. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, L. E. Marshall, & G. A. Serran (Eds.), Sexual offender treatment: Controversial issues (pp. 211–224). New York: Wiley.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 491–498.
Foote, W. E., & Laws, D. R. (1981). A daily alternation procedure for orgasmic reconditioning with a pedophile. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 12(3), 267–273.
Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362.
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis. (Cat. No.: PS3-1/2004-2E-PDF). Public Works and Government Services Canada. ISBN: 0-662-36397-3.
Howes, R. J. (1995). A survey of plethysmographic assessment in North America. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7(1), 9–24.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), 197–209. (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).
Klimecki, M. R., Jenkinson, J., & Wilson, L. (1994). A study of recidivism among offenders with an intellectual disability. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 19, 209–219.
Launay, G. (1999). The phallometric measurement of sex offenders: An update. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 9(3), 254–274.
Laws, D. R. (2009). Penile plethysmography: Strengths, limitations, innovations. In D. Thornton & D. R. Laws (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to the assessment of sexual interest in sexual offenders (pp. 7–29). New York: Wiley.
Laws, D. R., & Gress, C. L. Z. (2004). Seeing things differently: The viewing time alternative to penile plethysmography. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 183–196.
Laws, D. R., & Holmen, M. L. (1978). Sexual response faking by pedophiles. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 5(4), 343–356.
Laws, D. R., & Rubin, H. B. (1969). Instructional control of an autonomic sexual response. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2(2), 93–99.
Lindsay, W. R. (2002). Research and literature on sex offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(Suppl 1), 74–85.
Marquis, J. N. (1970). Orgasmic reconditioning: Changing sexual object choice through controlling masturbation fantasies. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 1(4), 263–271.
Marshall, W. L., & Fernandez, Y. M. (2003). Phallometric testing with sexual offenders: Theory, research, and practice. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
Marshall, W. L., & Laws, D. R. (2003). A brief history of behavioral and cognitive behavioral approaches to sexual offender treatment: Part 2. The modern era. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15(2), 93–120.
Mesler, J. L., Anderson, G., & Calkins, C. (2016). Sex offender policy and prevention. In M. K. Miller & B. H. Bornstein (Eds.), Advances in psychology and law (pp. 217–248). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Miltenberger, R. G. (2004). Behavior modification: Principles and procedures (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Murphy, W. D., & Barbaree, H. E. (1994). Assessments of sex offenders by measures of erectile response: Psychometric properties and decision making. Brandon, VT: The Safer Society Press.
Murphy, W. D., Coleman, E. M., & Haynes, M. R. (1983). Treatment and evaluation issues with the mentally retarded sex offender. In J. G. Greer & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual aggressor: Current perspectives on treatment (pp. 22–41). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
O’Donohue, W., & Letourneau, E. (1992). The psychometric properties of the penile tumescence assessment of child molesters. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 14(2), 123–174.
Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., & Carrigan, W. F. (1980). Biofeedback and signaled punishment in the modification of inappropriate sexual age preferences. Behavior Therapy, 11(4), 567–576.
Quinsey, V. L., & Earls, C. M. (1990). The modification of sexual preferences. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender. Applied clinical psychology (pp. 279–295). New York: Plenum Press.
Rea, J. A., DeBriere, T., Butler, K., & Saunders, K. J. (1998). An analysis of four sexual offenders’ arousal in the natural environment through the use of a portable penile plethysmograph. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10(3), 239–255.
Renaud, P., Chartier, S., Rouleau, J. L., Proulx, J., Trottier, D., Bradford, J. P., et al. (2009). Gaze behavior nonlinear dynamics assessed in virtual immersion as a diagnostic index of sexual deviancy: Preliminary results. Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 6(3) urn:nbn:de:0009-6-17538
Renaud, P., Proulx, P., Rouleau, J.-L., Bouchard, S., Madrigrano, G., Bradford, J., et al. (2005). The recording of observational behaviors in virtual immersion: A new research and clinical tool to address the problem of sexual preferences with paraphiliacs. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 3, 85–92.
Renaud, P., Rouleau, J. L., Granger, L., Barsetti, I., & Bouchard, S. (2002). Measuring sexual preferences in virtual reality: A pilot study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(1), 1–9.
Renaud, P., Rouleau, J.-L., Proulx, J., Trottier, D., Goyette, M., Bradford, J. P., et al. (2010). Virtual characters designed for forensic assessment and rehabilitation of sex offenders: Standardized and made-to-measure. Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 7(5) urn:nbn:de:0009-6-26466
Renaud, P., Trottier, D., Rouleau, J.-L., Goyette, M., Saumur, C., Boukhalfi, T., et al. (2014). Using immersive virtual reality and anatomically correct computer-generated characters in the forensic assessment of deviant sexual preferences. Virtual Reality, 18(1), 37–47.
Renzema, M., & Mayo-Wilson, E. (2005). Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(2), 215–237.
Reyes, J. R. (2009). Assessment of sex offenders with developmental disabilities. (Doctoral Dissertation). Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI No. 3334500).
Reyes, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., & Hall, A. (2011a). Replications and extensions in arousal assessment for sex offenders with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(2), 369–373.
Reyes, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., & Hall, A. (2011b). The influence of presession factors in the assessment of deviant arousal. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 707–717.
Reyes, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., & Hall, A. (2017). Comparison of arousal and preference assessment outcomes for sex offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(1), 27–37.
Reyes, J. R., Vollmer, T. R., Sloman, K. N., Hall, A., Reed, R., Jansen, G., et al. (2006). Assessment of deviant arousal in adult male sex offenders with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(2), 173–188.
Rosenthal, T. L. (1973). Response-contingent versus fixed punishment in aversion conditioning of pedophilia: A case study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 156(6), 440–443.
United States Department of Justice. (2014). Sex offender management assessment and planning initiative. Retrieved from: https://www.smart.gov/SOMAPI/pdfs/SOMAPI_Full%20Report.pdf
Vollmer, T. R., Reyes, J. R., & Walker, S. F. (2012). Behavioral assessment and Intervention for sex offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In J. Luiselli (Ed.), The handbook of high-risk challenging behaviors: Assessment and intervention. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Walker, S. F. (2013). The Influence of secondary stimulus characteristics in the assessment of sexual offenders diagnosed with intellectual disabilities. (Doctoral dissertation). Proquest Dissertations Publishing. (UMI No. 3583603).
Walker, S. F., Joslyn, P. R., Vollmer, T. R., & Hall, A. (2014). Differential suppression of arousal by sex offenders with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(3), 639–644.
Wilcox, D. T. (2004). Treatment of intellectually disabled individuals who have committed sexual offences: A review of the literature. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10(1), 85–100.
Wyatt v. Stickney, 325 F. Supp. 781. (M.D. Ala. 1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vollmer, T.R., Joslyn, P.R., Reyes, J.R., Walker, S.F. (2019). Behavior Analytic Approaches to Assessment and Intervention for Sex Offenders with Intellectual Disabilities. In: O’Donohue, W.T., Bromberg, D.S. (eds) Sexually Violent Predators: A Clinical Science Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04696-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04696-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04695-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04696-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)