Skip to main content

Do the Right Task! Supporting Volunteers Timetabling with Preferences Through the Sponsor Platform

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ambient Assisted Living (ForItAAL 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 540))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 435 Accesses

Abstract

Sponsor is an AAL project that aims at developing, testing and implementing an ICT platform to facilitate the posting, browsing and exchange of key information between competence-offering seniors and search-based requests from competence-demanding organizations within the public, private and voluntary sectors. This paper describes a specific aspect addressed in developing a pilot for the project dedicated to volunteering associations support. Very important when dealing with volunteers is their assignment to the right activities not only suitable for their capabilities but also for their current wishes. The paper describes a complete prototype called SponsorT developed to support a volunteering organisation called Televita. SponsorT helps managers to better allocate different activities to the volunteers with the overall aims to find the more suitable match in terms of aptitude and personal inclinations. Attention is given to the description of the end-to-end aspects of the prototyped application from the problem definition to its day by day use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.televita.org.

  2. 2.

    A complete description of the solver for SponsorT is given in [7].

  3. 3.

    First and last names have been obscured for privacy issues.

References

  1. Solving the Synergistic Team Composition Problem, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alberola, J. M., del Val Noguera, E., Saánchez-Anguix, V., Palomares, A., & Teruel, M. D. (2016). An artificial intelligence tool for heterogeneous team formation in the classroom. Knowledge- Based Systems, 101, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrejczuk, E., Rodŕıguez-Aguilar, J., Roig, C., & Sierra, C. (2017, February). Synergistic team composition. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS ’17 (pp. 1463–1465).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aritzeta, A., Swailes, S., & Senior, B. (2007). Belbin’s team role model: Development, validity and applications for team building. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 96–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bowling, A. (2008). Enhancing later life: How older people perceive active ageing? Aging & Mental Health, 12(3), 293–301. PMID: 18728941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Calvo, E., Haverstick, K., & Sass, S. A. (2009). Gradual retirement, sense of control, and retirees’ happiness. Research on Aging, 31(1), 112–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., De Benedictis, R., & Fracasso, F. (2017). A tool for managing elderly volunteering activities in small organizations. In AI*IA 2017. Advances in Artificial Intelligence—XVIth International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, Bari, Italy, November 14–17, 2017, Proceedings (pp. 455–467).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., De Benedictis, R., Fracasso, F., Baumann, D., Cuomo, S., Doyle, J., Imeri, A., Khadraoui, D., & Rossel, P. (2016). Personalizing support to older adults who look for a job with the Sponsor Platform. Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence for Ambient Assisted Living 2016 Workshop, pages 105–122, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cesta, A., Oddi, A., & Smith, S. F. (2002). A constraint-based method for project scheduling with time windows. Journal of Heuristics, 8(1), 109–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Moura, L., & Bjørner, N. (2008). Z3: An efficient SMT solver. In Proceedings of the Theory and Practice of Software, 14th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, TACAS’08/ETAPS’08 (pp 337–340). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Vaus, D., Wells, Y., Kending, H., & Quine, S. (2007). Does gradual retirement have better outcomes than abrupt retirement? Results from an australian panel study. Ageing & Society, 27(5), 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farhangian, M., Purvis, M., Purvis, M., & Savarimuthu, T. B. R. (2015). Agent-based modeling of resource allocation in software projects based on personality and skill. In F. Koch, C. Guttmann, & D. Busquets (Eds.), Advances in social computing and multiagent systems (pp. 130–146). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Fasbender, U., Wang, M., Voltmer, J.-B., & Deller, J. (2016). The meaning of work for post-retirement employment decisions. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2(1), 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feldman, D. C. (1994). The decision to retire early: A review and conceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hershey, D. A., & Henkens, K. (2014). Impact of different types of retirement transitions on perceived satisfaction with life. The Gerontologist, 54(2), 232–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim, V. K., & Feldman, D. (2003). The impact of time structure and time usage on willingness to retire and accept bridge employment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(7), 1178–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Manyaà, F., Negrete, S., Roig, C., & Soler, J. R. (2017). A MaxSAT-based approach to the team composition problem in a classroom. In G. Sukthankar & J. A. Rodriguez-Aguilar (Ed.), Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 164–173). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1995). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quine, S., Wells, Y., De Vaus, D., & Kendig, H. (2007). When choice in retirement decisions is missing: Qualitative and quantitative findings of impact on well-being. Australasian Journal of Ageing, 26(4), 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riumallo-Herl, C., Basu, S., Stuckler, D., Courtin, E., & Avendano, M. (2014). Job loss, wealth and depression during the great recession in the USA and Europe. Internationa Journal of Epidemiology, 43(5), 1508–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwingel, A., Niti, M. M., Tang, C., & Ng, T. P. (2009). Continued work employment and volunteerism and mental well-being of older adults: Singapore longitudinal ageing studies. Age and Ageing, 38(5), 531–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. van Solinge, H., & Henkens, K. (2007). Involuntary retirement: The role of restrictive circumstances, timing, and social embeddedness. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 62(5), S295–S303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Solinge, H., & Henkens, K. (2008). Adjustment to and satisfaction with retirement: Two of a kind? Psychology and Aging, 23(2), 422–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, M. (2007). Profiling retirees in the retirement transition and adjustment process: Examining the longitudinal change patterns of retirees’ psychological well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2014). Psychological research on retirement. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 209–233. PMID: 23751036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors work is partially funded by the Active and Assisted Living Joint Program under the Sponsor project (AAL-2013-6-118—http://sponsor-aal.eu/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amedeo Cesta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cesta, A., Coraci, L., Cortellessa, G., De Benedictis, R., Fracasso, F. (2019). Do the Right Task! Supporting Volunteers Timetabling with Preferences Through the Sponsor Platform. In: Casiddu, N., Porfirione, C., Monteriù, A., Cavallo, F. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2017. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 540. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04672-9_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04672-9_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04671-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04672-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics