Abstract
Swarm robotics describes a multi-robot system characterized by the simplicity of its agents, homogeneous architecture, limited communication skills, local detection, execution of parallel tasks, robustness, scalability, flexibility and decentralized control. However, being a technology in development, the security and vulnerability of the swarm of robots against possible cybernetic attacks have been commonly overlooked. This is of major concern when executing mission-critical activities that inherently require an adequate management of security. In this work, a bio-inspired security mechanism applied to a swarm of robots is proposed. Through computer simulations, it is observed how the mechanism, when executing a homing towards a stationary landmark, allows the swarm of robots to identify abnormal behaviors, caused by a certain cyberattack; subsequently, it establishes a certain tolerance to it and allows to improve the level of availability that is required to continue executing the task at hand.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Brambilla, M., Ferrante, E., Birattari, M., Dorigo, M.: Swarm robotics: a review from the swarm engineering perspective. Swarm Intell. 7(1), 1–41 (2013)
Brooks, R.: A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 2(1), 14–23 (1986)
Carneiro, J., et al.: When three is not a crowd: a crossregulation model of the dynamics and repertoire selection of regulatory CD4+T cells. Immunol. Rev. 216(1), 48–68 (2007)
Chen, X.: Enabling disconnected transitive communication in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Principles of Mobile Computing, Colocated with PODC 2001, pp. 21–27 (2001)
Cohen, I.: Tending Adam’s Garden: Evolving the Cognitive Immune Self. Elsevier Science (2000)
Dailey, K.: The FMEA Pocket Handbook: Failure Mode and Effects Analysis. DW Publishing (2004)
Dias, M.B., Zinck, M., Zlot, R., Stentz, A.: Robust multirobot coordination in dynamic environments. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004, Proceedings, ICRA 2004, vol. 4, pp. 3435–3442, April 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1308785
Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., Colorni, A.: Ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 26(1), 29–41 (1996)
Fagiolini, A., Dini, G., Bicchi, A.: Distributed intrusion detection for the security of industrial cooperative robotic systems. IFAC Proc. Vol. 47(3), 7610–7615 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02666
Feng, R., Xu, X., Zhou, X., Wan, J.: A trust evaluation algorithm for wireless sensor networks based on node behaviors and D-S evidence theory. Sensors 11(2), 1345–1360 (2011)
Gutiérrez, A., Campo, A., Dorigo, M., Amor, D., Magdalena, L., Monasterio-Huelin, F.: An open localization and local communication embodied sensor. Sensors 8(11), 7545–7563 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3390/s8117545
Hartmann, K., Steup, C.: The vulnerability of UAVs to cyber attacks - an approach to the risk assessment. In: 2013 5th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CYCON 2013), pp. 1–23, June 2013
Holldobler, B., Wilson, E.O.: The Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Holldobler, B., Wilson, E.O.: Journey to the Ants. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1994)
(ISO), I.S.O.: ISO/IEC 7498–2:1989. Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Basic Reference Model - Part 2: Security Architecture. Iso7498-2:1989, pp. 1–32 (1989)
Janeway, C.A.J., Travers, P., Walport, M., Shlomchik, M.J.: Immunobiology: The Immune System in Health and Disease, 5th edn. Garland Science, New York (2001)
Javaid, A.Y., Sun, W., Devabhaktuni, V.K., Alam, M.: Cyber security threat analysis and modeling of an unmanned aerial vehicle system. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), pp. 585–590, November 2012
Jones, E.G., Browning, B., Dias, M.B., Argall, B., Veloso, M., Stentz, A.: Dynamically formed heterogeneous robot teams performing tightly-coordinated tasks. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2006, pp. 570–575, May 2006
Kalech, M., Kaminka, G.A., Meisels, A., Elmaliach, Y.: Diagnosis of multi-robot coordination failures using distributed CSP algorithms. In: American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2006). AAAI Press (2006)
Khaldi, B., Harrou, F., Cherif, F., Sun, Y.: Monitoring a robot swarm using a data-driven fault detection approach. Robot. Auton. Syst. 97, 193–203 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.06.002
Kim, A., Wampler, B., Goppert, J., Hwang, I., Aldridge, H.: Cyber attack vulnerabilities analysis for unmanned aerial vehicles. In: Infotech@Aerospace (2012)
Kolling, A., Walker, P., Chakraborty, N., Sycara, K., Lewis, M.: Human interaction with robot swarms: a survey. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 46(1), 9–26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2015.2480801
León, K., Lage, A., Carneiro, J.: Tolerance and immunity in a mathematical model of T-cell mediated suppression. J. Theor. Biol. 225(1), 107–126 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00226-1
León, K., Peréz, R., Lage, A., Carneiro, J.: Modelling T-cell-mediated suppression dependent on interactions in multicellular conjugates. J. Theor. Biol. 207(2), 231–254 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2169
Mansfield, K., Eveleigh, T., Holzer, T.H., Sarkani, S.: Unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station cyber security threat model. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), pp. 722–728, November 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2013.6699093
Mansfield, K., Eveleigh, T., Holzer, T.H., Sarkani, S.: DoD comprehensive military unmanned aerial vehicle smart device ground control station threat model. Publ. Def. Acquis. Univ. 23(2), 240–273 (2015)
Meng, Y., Nickerson, J.V., Gan, J.: Multi-robot aggregation strategies with limited communication. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2691–2696, October 2006
Mondada, F., et al.: The e-puck, a robot designed for education in engineering. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–65 (2009). ISBN 978-972-99143-8-6
Nembrini, J., University of the West of England: Minimalist coherent swarming of wireless networked autonomous mobile robots. Ph.D. thesis, University of the West of England (2005)
Nickerson, J.V.: A concept of communication distance and its application to six situations in mobile environments. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 4(5), 409–419 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2005.60
Nickerson, J.V., Olariu, S.: A measure for integration and its application to sensor networks. In: Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems (WITS), August 2005
Parker, L.E.: Alliance: an architecture for fault tolerant multirobot cooperation. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 14(2), 220–240 (1998)
Pinciroli, C., et al.: ARGoS: a modular, parallel, multi-engine simulator for multi-robot systems. Swarm Intell. 6(4), 271–295 (2012)
Schoonderwoerd, R., Holland, O.E., Bruten, J.L., Rothkrantz, L.J.M.: Ant-based load balancing in telecommunications networks. Adapt. Behav. 5(2), 169–207 (1997)
Strohmeier, M., Lenders, V., Martinovic, I.: On the security of the automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast protocol. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(2), 1066–1087 (2015)
The Common Criteria: (22 de Junio de 2018). https://www.commoncriteriaportal.org
Timmis, J., Ismail, A., Bjerknes, J., Winfield, A.: An immune-inspired swarm aggregation algorithm for self-healing swarm robotic systems. Biosystems 146, 60–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.04.001. Information Processing in Cells and Tissues
Timmis, J., Andrews, P., Hart, E.: On artificial immune systems and swarm intelligence. Swarm Intell. 4(4), 247–273 (2010)
Vain, J., Tammet, T., Kuusik, A., Juurik, S.: Towards scalable proofs of robot swarm dependability. In: 2008 11th International Biennial Baltic Electronics Conference, pp. 199–202, October 2008. https://doi.org/10.1109/BEC.2008.4657513
Viksnin, I., Iureva, R., Komarov, I., Drannik, A.: Assessment of stability of algorithms based on trust and reputation model. In: Proceedings of the 18th Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT, FRUCT 2018, pp. 364–369. FRUCT Oy, Helsinki, Finland (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/FRUCT-ISPIT.2016.7561551
Zikratov, I.A., Lebedev, I.S., Gurtov, A.V.: Trust and reputation mechanisms for multi-agent robotic systems. In: Balandin, S., Andreev, S., Koucheryavy, Y. (eds.) NEW2AN 2014. LNCS, vol. 8638, pp. 106–120. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10353-2_10
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by IPN under Projects SIP-1894 and SIP-20180460. The first author gratefully acknowledge the support from the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT) and IPN-PIFI BEIFI grant to carry out this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hernández-Herrera, A., Espino, E.R., Escamilla Ambrosio, P.J. (2018). A Bio-Inspired Cybersecurity Schemeto Protect a Swarm of Robots. In: Batyrshin, I., Martínez-Villaseñor, M., Ponce Espinosa, H. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. MICAI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11289. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04497-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04497-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04496-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04497-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)