Skip to main content

Uruk and the Greco-Roman World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scholars and Scholarship in Late Babylonian Uruk

Part of the book series: Why the Sciences of the Ancient World Matter ((WSAWM,volume 2))

  • 366 Accesses

Abstract

Uruk seems hardly to have been known in the broader Greco-Roman world except in rather specialized circles. A version of its Greek name occurs in Ptolemy’s Geography and his Handy Tables . The people of Uruk, the Orchenoi or Orchenioi , also show up in the Geography, as well as in the astrological geography of Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos, where Ptolemy associates astronomy with three peoples, Babylonians, Chaldaioi and Orchenoi, though apparently in his eyes the Babylonians were somehow more exotic, while the Chaldaioi and Orchenoi were more ‘people like us’. Pliny and Strabo also know the Orchenoi primarily as practitioners of astral science. A recently discovered papyrus fragment, P.Oxy. astr. 4139, takes us beyond these literary references by associating the Orchenoi with specific doctrines in mathematical lunar theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kuhrt and Sherwin-White (1993: 149–155), Cohen (2013: 174–177).

  2. 2.

    On bullae from Hellenistic Uruk, the city’s name appears in the genetive or dative, as Ὄρχων or Ὄρχοις, so the nominative was either Ὄρχα or Ὄρχοι; see Aymard (1938: 6 n. 6) and Cohen (2013: 175 n. 1). The Septuagint’s form, recurring in later Christian writers, is Ὀρέχ.

  3. 3.

    The quoted readings and the reconstructed map in Fig. 9.1 are based on Stückelberger and Grasshoff (2006). Longitudinal intervals in the Geography notoriously tend to be systematically too large.

  4. 4.

    For discussion and an edition of the Table of Noteworthy Cities, see Stückelberger et al. (2009).

  5. 5.

    The descriptions of the course of the Euphrates in Book 5, Chaps. 18 and 20 are marred by corruptions. Ptolemy evidently provided either the branch of the river through Babylon or the one through Seleukeia with the additional name ‘Royal River’ (Βασίλειος ποταμός). The edition of Stückelberger et al. adopts the latter alternative, but I suspect that the Royal River was in fact the river through Babylon . At 5.18.8 I suggest reading ὧν ὁ μὲν (μεταξὺ codd.) καλεῖται Βασίλειος ποταμός, and at 5.20.2 I would delete the first καί.

  6. 6.

    Steele (2015).

  7. 7.

    Parker (1959).

  8. 8.

    Hughes (1951). See Winkler (2009: 365).

  9. 9.

    A related, anonymous eclipse omen text is published in Catalogus Codicum Astrologorum Graecorum v. 7, 129–149.

  10. 10.

    They are conveniently tabulated with excellent discussion in Heilen (2015: 303–309). See also de Callataÿ (19992000, 2002).

  11. 11.

    For a schematic diagram of Ptolemy’s system in the Tetrabiblos, see Heilen (2015: 324).

  12. 12.

    Orchenia is specified as an affected place for ominous phenomena in three passages of Ioannes Lydus’s De Ostentis (Sect. 25, 56, and 71 in Wachsmuth’s 1897 edition). But Lydus’s geographical lists are obviously derived from the Tetrabiblos (with the addition of a curious ‘Antorchenia’ as an alternative to Orchenia ).

  13. 13.

    Oelsner (1971, 1982).

  14. 14.

    Jones (1999: 1.97–99, 2.22–23).

References

  • Aymard, André. 1938. Une ville de la Babylonie séleucide, d’après les contrats cunéiformes. Revue des Études Anciennes 40: 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Getzel M. 2013. The Hellenistic settlements in the east from Armenia and Mesopotamia to Bactria and India. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Callataÿ, Godefroid. 2002. Die astrologische Geographie in der Antike. In Religiöse Landschaften, ed. J. Hahn and C. Ronning, 85–104. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Callataÿ, Godefroid. 1999–2000. Οἰκουμένη ὑπουράνιος: réflexions sur l’origine et le sens de la géographie astrologique. Geographia Antiqua 8–9: 25–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilen, Stephan. 2015. The Star of Bethlehem and Greco-Roman astrology, especially astrological geography. In The star of Bethlehem and the Magi: Interdisciplinary perspectives from experts on the Ancient Near East, the Greco-Roman world, and modern astronomy, ed. P. Barthel and G. van Kooten, 297–357. Leiden: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, George R. 1951. A demotic astrological text. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 10: 256–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Alexander. 1999. Astronomical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus, 2 vols. in 1. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhrt, Amélie, and Susan Sherwin-White. 1993. From Samarkhand to Sardis: A new approach to the Seleucid Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer, Otto. 1975. A history of ancient mathematical astronomy. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelsner, Joachim. 1971. War Nippur Sitz einer spätbabylonischen Astronomenschule? Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Gesellschafts- und sprachwissenschaftliche Reihe 20: 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelsner, Joachim. 1982. Nochmals ‘Hipparenum (Plinius Nat. Hist. VI 123) = Nippur?’ Altorientalische Forschungen 9: 259–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Richard A. 1959. A Vienna demotic papyrus on eclipse- and lunar-omina. Providence: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, John M. 2015. Mesopotamian astrological geography. In The star of Bethlehem and the Magi: Interdisciplinary perspectives from experts on the Ancient Near East, the Greco-Roman world, and modern astronomy, ed. P. Barthel and G. van Kooten, 199–216. Leiden: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stückelberger, Alfred and Gerd Grasshoff. 2006. Klaudios Ptolemaios Handbuch der Geographie: Griechisch-Deutsch, 2 vols. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stückelberger, Alfred, Florian Mittenhuber, and Lutz Koch. 2009. 2.2 Κανὼν πόλεων ἐπισήμων/Kanon bedeutender Städte (griechisch-deutsch). In Klaudios Ptolemaios Handbuch der Geographie: Ergänzungsband, ed. A. Stückelberger and F. Mittenhuber, 134–215. Basel: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, Andreas. 2009. On the astrological papyri from the Tebtunis Temple library. In Actes du IXe congrès international des études démotiques, ed. G. Widmer and D. Devauchelle, 361–375. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 269804.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jones, A. (2019). Uruk and the Greco-Roman World. In: Proust, C., Steele, J. (eds) Scholars and Scholarship in Late Babylonian Uruk. Why the Sciences of the Ancient World Matter, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04176-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04176-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04175-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04176-2

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics