Skip to main content

Union Canutes Cannot Halt PFI

The Reporting of Private Finance in British Public Services in 2002 and 2007

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Content of British Economic, Business and Financial Journalism
  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

The Private Finance Initiative (PFI) was one of the most contentious policies of Tony Blair’s government. In the first four years of his Labour administration, some 450 contracts had been signed for new schools, hospitals, infrastructure and other projects. Supporters argued that private finance would help rejuvenate public services and quickly compensate for decades of under-investment, while still allowing strict public sector spending targets to be achieved. Opponents of PFI, however, believed long-term cost far outstripped short-term benefit. There were also concerns about private companies becoming directly involved in health, education, defence and other parts of the British public sector. The competing arguments were forced into the open at the Labour Party Conference in September 2002. Over the period of analysis, the Guardian/Observer sided with the PFI sceptics, whereas the Daily and Sunday Telegraph favoured PFI. Although the quantitative analysis suggests the BBC gave equal exposure to both sides, its dominant discourse supported the government’s position. In a second sample period five years later, there was scant sign of mediated debate. Across all three news organisations, private finance was invariably presented in plain, descriptive terms and was framed as inevitable and non-problematic.

Jones (2002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With contracts between 30 and 60 years, PFI is akin to a mortgage (Schifferes 2002a).

  2. 2.

    Richard Brooks is a prolific journalistic critic of PFI . He has written numerous articles for Private Eye on the subject.

  3. 3.

    In the early 2000s, Professor Allyson Pollock was head of the Public Health Policy Unit at University College London and is arguably the most learned and vociferous critic of PFI in the health service.

  4. 4.

    For the sake of brevity, references to the Guardian/Observer sample will henceforth be shortened to the ‘Guardian’. Similarly, the Daily/Sunday Telegraph will become the ‘Telegraph’.

  5. 5.

    Public–private partnership (PPP ) can be defined as: ‘any collaboration between public bodies, such as local authorities or central government, and private companies’ and, hence, PFI is one type of PPP (BBC 2003b).

  6. 6.

    An alternative interpretation, given by an anonymous journalist, is that the Labour Party deliberately avoided using ‘PFI’ in the mid-2000s because of its association with projects that appeared to offer poor value-for-money.

  7. 7.

    At the Conference, there were 26 reporters and editors from the Guardian; all of the Telegraph’s political team and some leader writers; and around 200 BBC staff (Addley and Fleming 2002).

  8. 8.

    The averages were also inflated by 60 articles that contained three or more named sources .

  9. 9.

    This category includes academics, scientists, economists and think tanks.

  10. 10.

    For example, parent−teacher, passenger and hospital user associations.

  11. 11.

    The simplified ratios were: BBC 2:1; Guardian 3:1; Telegraph 6:1.

  12. 12.

    In 2002, Conservative MPs accounted for 2.2% of all named and unnamed sources . Although this group fared better proportionately in 2007 (4.2%), it was striking that the official parliamentary opposition made such a limited contribution to this debate.

  13. 13.

    See Chapter 2.

  14. 14.

    For example, BBC (2007c).

  15. 15.

    See below—critical discourse analysis .

  16. 16.

    For example, Henry (2007) and Gow (2002b).

  17. 17.

    The weighted total was calculated by multiplying the frequency of articles in the ‘detailed coverage’ category by 3; ‘limited coverage’ by 2; ‘acknowledged’ by 1, ‘critical coverage’ by minus 1, and ‘no mention’ by zero. See Chapter 2.

  18. 18.

    Sixty-one per cent of the public were against (BBC 2003a).

  19. 19.

    Taxpayers cash ‘wasted’ on PFI .

  20. 20.

    The Guardian also covered this story, but its lead paragraph began: ‘Tony Blair yesterday came under union pressure to condemn publicly the excessive pay awards given to senior directors of companies involved in a host of lucrative (PFI ) projects’ (Gow 2002a).

  21. 21.

    For example, Osler (2002: 122) and Toynbee (2002).

  22. 22.

    For example, Mathiason (2002) and Macalister (2002a, b).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary James Merrill .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Merrill, G.J. (2019). Union Canutes Cannot Halt PFI. In: The Political Content of British Economic, Business and Financial Journalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04012-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics