Skip to main content

A Living Systems Perspective for Stewarding Sustainability Transformations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stewarding Sustainability Transformations

Abstract

This Chapter introduces systems thinking with a focus on life-enhancing processes. It does so in a trans- and multidisciplinary way and shows the role of patterns as a relational and constituting element in the co-creative process of life. Drawing on socio-ecological research, it relates such constituting elements to vitality and resilience as a form of aliveness in living systems. It argues that transferring and translating the insights of this approach to understanding how socio-ecological systems as well as human interaction systems function (or fail to function) is key to conceptualizing stewarding sustainability transformations in a new way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pattern, retrieved on 8th August, 2016.

  2. 2.

    See the following remarks: “The Nature of Order is not only a summa summarum of what Oxford University Press has called “The World of Christopher Alexander”, but it is surely one of the most ambitious books ever published. Its profound argument ,, that order in both nature and in what we build is essentially the same ,, if ultimately understood and accepted by serious readers may prove to be one of the most consequential works Oxford has published in all its 500 years.” William McClung, special project editor for Oxford University Press, former senior editor of the University of California Press. Source accessed on second March 2017: http://www.regismedina.com/articles/christopher-alexander-theory-of-incremental-design

  3. 3.

    Source (accessed on third June 2917): http://www.oecd.org/statistics/measuring-well-being-and-progress.htm

References

  • Alexander, C. (1979). The timeless way of building (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (2002a). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book I The phenomenon of life. Berkeley, CA: The Center for Environmental Structure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (2002b). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book II The process of creating life. Berkeley, CA: The Center for Environmental Structure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (2005). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book III A vision of a living world. Berkeley, CA: The Center for Environmental Structure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (2004). The nature of order. An essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe: Book IV The luminous ground. Berkeley, CA: The Center for Environmental Structure.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. (2007). Empirical findings from the nature of order. Environmental and Architectural Phenomenology, 18(1), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. California: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., & Atran, S. (2001). The trouble with memes. Human Nature, 12(4), 351–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (2001). The trouble with memes. Human Nature, 12(4), 351–381.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, X., van der Leeuw, S., O’Brien, K., Berkhout, F., Biermann, F., Brondizio, E. S., & Revkin, A. (2016). Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda. Global Environmental Change, 39, 351–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, M., & Cummings, R. (Eds.). (2009). Wiki writing: Collaborative learning in the college classroom. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (2000). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. (1993). The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1962, 1962). Die Krisis des Menschen als eine Krisis des Zwischens. In M. Buber (Ed.), Werke Erster Band: Schriften zur Philosophie. München\Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1970). I and thou. Touchstone. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (2003). The hidden connection, a science for sustainable living. London: Flamingo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The system’s view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Information, systems, and information systems. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, A. (1996). The interaction of social issues and software architecture. Communications of the ACM, 39(10), 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: An interactive model. Social Indicators Research, 52(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. A. (2008). Review of David Granger, John Dewey, Robert Pirsig, and the art of living: Revisioning aesthetic education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(4), 395–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33(1), 25–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (2000). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). The feeling of what happens. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M., Peterson, G., Bengtsson, J., Walker, B., & Norberg, J. (2003). Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(9), 488–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favareau, D. (Ed.). (2010). Essential readings in biosemiotics. Anthology and commentary. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finidori, H. (2016). Patterns that connect: Potential of pattern/languages for sustainable futures. Model Report: Systems Thinking, Modeling and Simulation News. Retrieved from https://model.report/s/mjmowj/patterns_that_connect_potential_of_pattern_languages_for_sustainable_futures_-_finidori

  • Finidori, H., Borghini, I., & Henfrey, T. (2015). Towards a fourth generation pattern language: Patterns as epistemic threads for systemic orientation. Draft paper to be published in the Proceedings of the Pursuit of Pattern Languages for Societal Change Conference, Krems, Austria: Danube University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, P. R. (1999). Karma and chaos. Seattle: Vipassana Research Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Holling, C. S., & Perrings, C. (1996). Biological diversity, ecosystems, and the human scale. Ecological Applications, 6(4), 1018–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2009). Embodied cognitive neuroscience and its consequences for psychiatry. Poiesis, & Praxis, 6(3–4), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, J. (2015). Regenerative capitalism: How universal principles and patterns will shape our new economy. Capital Institute: Future of Finance Publication [online publication]. Retrieved from http://capitalinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-Regenerative-Capitalism-4-20-15-final.pdf

  • Gabriel, R. P. (1996). Patterns of software. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., McMeekin, A., Mylan, J., & Southerton, D. (2015). A critical appraisal of sustainable consumption and production research: The reformist, revolutionary and reconfiguration positions. Global Environmental Change, 34, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goepel, M. (2016). The great mindshift. How a new economic paradigm and sustainability transformations go hand in hand. New York: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotts, N. M. (2007). Resilience, panarchy, and world-systems analysis. Ecology and Society, 12(1): 24. [online] Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art24/.

  • Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T., & Redman, C. L. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience, 50, 571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological resilience in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31(1), 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. V. (1942). Scientism and the study of society. Part I. Economica, 9(35), 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilborn, R. C. (2000). Chaos and nonlinear dynamics: An introduction for scientists and engineers. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, K., & Kangas, O. (2003). When is a change big enough to be a system shift? Small system-shifting changes in German and Finnish pension policies. Social Policy, & Administration, 37(6), 573–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, B., Scarrow, G., & Schellenberg, M. (2012). Translating evidence into practice: The role of health research funders. Implementation Science, 7(39), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. Chichester: John Wiley, & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, J. (1996). Synchronicity: The inner path of leadership. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., Sun, J., & Wang, S. (2006). Pattern recognition: An overview. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 6(6), 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, S. E., Patten, B. C., & Straškraba, M. (1992). Ecosystems emerging: Toward an ecology of complex systems in a complex future. Ecological Modelling, 62(1–3), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juarero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action. Internal behaviour as a complex systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1996). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (2016). Humanity in a creative universe. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, V. (1989). Life, the multiverse and everything; An introduction to the ideas of Humberto Maturana. In A. L. Goudsmit (Ed.), Self-organisation in psychotherapy (pp. 17–47). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. C. (2007). The great turning: From empire to earth community. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. C. (2015). Change the story, change the future: A living economy for a living earth. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P. (2016). The art of leading collectively: How we can co-create a sustainable, socially just future. Claremont, NH: Chelsea Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuenkel, P., Gerlach, S., & Frieg, V. (2011). Working with stakeholder dialogues: Key concepts and competencies for achieving common goals. A practical guide for change agents from public sector, private sector and civil society. Potsdam: The Collective Leadership Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laloux, F. (2014). Reinventing organizations. Brussels: Nelson Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. (1995). The ages of Gaia: A biography of our living earth. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machery, E. (2010). Explaining why experimental behavior varies across cultures: A missing step in “the weirdest people in the world?”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 101–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. (1987). Patterns, thinking and cognition. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1998). Symbiotic planet: A new look at evolution. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, J. (1991a). The dharma of natural systems, mutual causality in Buddhism and general systems theory. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, J. (1991b). World as lover, world as self. Berkeley: Parallax Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1991). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (Vol. 42). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Mpodozis, J. (2000). The origin of species by means of natural drift. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 73(2), 261–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: Roots of human understanding. London: New Science Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. In R. S. Cohen & M. W. Wartofsky (Eds.), Boston studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 42). Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1975). Autopoietic systems: A characterisation of the living organisation. Biological Computer Laboratory Report 9.4, University of Illinois, Urbana. Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, A., & Wiggins, G. (2010). Tidal–pattern language for the live coding of music. In Proceedings of the 7th Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 331–334).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: Places to intervene into a system. Hartland,VT: Sustainability Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010). A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service Science, 2(1–2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2.1_2.126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems theory. New York: McGrow Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1985). General living systems theory. In P. Pichot (Ed.), Biological psychiatry, higher nervous activity (pp. 673–678). New York: Springer Science, & Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F. (1997). The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: Harper Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obolensky, N. (2014). Complex adaptive leadership: Embracing paradox and uncertainty. Farnham: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015). System innovation. Synthesis report. Retrieved from https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/sites/default/files/general/SYSTEMINNOVATION_FINALREPORT.pdf. June 30, 2017.

  • Pask, G. (1992). Different kinds of cybernetics. In G. Van de Vijver (Ed.), New perspectives on cybernetics (pp. 11–31). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1996). The end of certainty: Time chaos and the new laws of nature. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Nicolis, G. (1977). Self-organization in non-equilibrium systems. New Jersey: John Wiley, & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radin, D., Lund, N., Emoto, M., & Kizu, T. (2008). Effects of distant intention on water crystal formation: A triple-blind replication. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 22(4), 481–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates, R., & Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: The promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P., Electris, C., & Rosen, R. A. (2010). The century ahead: Searching for sustainability. Sustainability, 2(8), 2626–2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2082626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rising, L., & Janoff, N. S. (2000). The Scrum software development process for small teams. IEEE Software, 17(4), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabelli, H., & Carlson-Sabelli, L. (2006). Bios, a process approach to living system theory. In honour of James and Jessie Miller. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(3), 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahtouris, E., & Lovelock, J. E. (2000). Earthdance: Living systems in evolution. San Jose, CA: iUniverse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I. (2002). Does god play dice? Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, G.A., & Miller, J.G. (2009). Living systems theory. Systems Science and Cybernetics: Synergetics, 1(System Theories), 136–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A., & Alvin, T. (1981). The third wave. New York: Bantam books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tononi, G. (2005). Consciousness, information integration, and the brain. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNGC (United Nations Global Compact), & Bertelsmann Stiftung, Authors: Simeonov, S., Gradl, C., Knobloch, C., & Peters, A. (2012). A strategy for the commons. Business-driven networks for collective action and policy dialogue. The example of global compact local networks [Online Publication]. Available from http://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/bst/en/media/xcms_bst_dms_36090_36091_2.pdf Downloaded October 14 2013

  • Varela, F. J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Maturana, H. R., & Uribe, R. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems, 5(4), 187–196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. T., & Rosch, E. (1992). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser W. (Ed.). (2014). The principles of CSR 2.0. In CSR 2.0: Transforming corporate sustainability and responsibility, (pp. 51–65). Berlin\Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2015). Reflections: Intellectual shamans, sensemaking, and memes in large system change. Journal of Change Management, 15(4), 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, S., Waddock, S., Cornell, S., Dentoni, D., McLachlan, M., & Meszoely, G. (2015). Large systems change: An emerging field of transformation and transitions. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 58, 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5 Retrieved from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (2013). Enlivenment. Towards a fundamental shift in the concepts of nature, culture and politics. Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (2016). Biology of wonder: Aliveness, feeling and the metamorphosis of science. New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A., & Varela, F. J. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(2), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020368120174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, H. (2001). Group process and group phenomena on the internet. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 51(3), 361–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, M. (1999). Leadership and the new science, discovering order in a chaotic world. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948, 1965). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (1990). The quantum self: Human nature and consciousness defined by the new physics. New York: Quill/William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. (1994). The quantum society: Mind, physics and a new social vision. New York: Quill/William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuenkel, P. (2019). A Living Systems Perspective for Stewarding Sustainability Transformations. In: Stewarding Sustainability Transformations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03691-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics