Skip to main content

Variation in Space Use and Social Cohesion Within and Between Four Groups of Woolly Monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) in Relation to Fruit Availability and Mating Opportunities at the Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Ecuador

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Movement Ecology of Neotropical Forest Mammals

Abstract

Like other members of their subfamily (e.g., spider monkeys and muriquis), woolly monkeys have long been suspected to have flexible association patterns. Yet, the dispersed nature of woolly monkey groups as they perform their daily activities has made it difficult for previous studies to quantitatively describe how spatial cohesion and ranging dynamics, both within and between groups, may vary over time and in relation to temporal fluctuations in resources, such as fruit and mating opportunities. Using a combination of location and subgroup composition records collected by multiple observers on animals belonging to four neighboring social groups, we found that lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) at the Tiputini Biodiversity StationĀ in Amazonian Ecudaor demonstrate relatively high degrees of fission-fusion dynamics, with groups dividing frequently into subgroups and showing temporally variable cohesion among group members. Associations were not limited to members of a single social group, and tolerant associations between members of some neighboring social groups occurred with relatively high frequency. As observed in other woolly monkey populations, home range overlap between neighboring groups was extensive, with particular pairs of groups showing higher degrees of overlap than others. Although woolly monkeys are considered non-territorial, the four focal social groups retained some exclusivity of their core areas as evidenced by minimal core area overlap during most months of sampling for most pairs of groups. Surprisingly, habitat-wide estimates of fruit availability had little to no influence on the observed variation in group cohesion and ranging patterns among the four groups, while indices of mating opportunities did, suggesting that grouping and ranging dynamics in woolly monkeys may not primarily be the result of competition over food, but rather of competition over mates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227ā€“266

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Anderson DP, Nordheim EV, Boesch C, Moermond TC (2002) Factors influencing fission-fusion grouping in chimpanzees. In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant L (eds) Behavioral diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 90ā€“101

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Asensio N, Korstjens AH, Aureli F (2009) Fissioning minimizes ranging costs in spider monkeys: a multiple-level approach. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:649ā€“659

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Aureli F, Schaffner CM, Boesch C et al (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. Curr Anthropol 49:627ā€“654

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Barton K (2016) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.15.6. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn

  • Bates D, MƤchler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1ā€“48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bermejo M (2004) Home-range use and intergroup encounters in western gorillas (Gorilla g. gorilla) at Lossi forest, North Congo. Am J Primatol 64:223ā€“232. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20073

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bezanson M, Garber PA, Murphy JT, Premo LS (2008) Patterns of subgrouping and spatial affiliation in a community of mantled howling monkeys (Alouatta palliata). Am J Primatol 70:282ā€“293. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20486

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Blake JG, Guerra J, Mosquera D et al (2010) Use of mineral licks by white-bellied spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth) and red howler monkeys (Alouatta seniculus) in Eastern Ecuador. Int J Primatol 31:471ā€“483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-010-9407-5

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Blake JG, Mosquera D, Loiselle BA et al (2012) Temporal activity patterns of terrestrial mammals in lowland rainforest of eastern Ecuador. Ecotropica 18:137ā€“146

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Boesch C (1996) Social grouping in Tai chimpanzees. In: McGrew W, Marchant L, Nishida T (eds) Great ape societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 101ā€“113

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Boesch C, Boesch-Achermann H (2000) The chimpanzees of the TaĆÆ forest: behavioural ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bradley BJ, Doran-Sheehy DM, Lukas D et al (2004) Dispersed male networks in Western gorillas. Curr Biol 14:510ā€“513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.062

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Burt WH (1949) Territoriality. J Mammal 30:25ā€“27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1375192

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Caillaud D, Ndagijimana F, Giarrusso AJ et al (2014) Mountain gorilla ranging patterns: influence of group size and group dynamics. Am J Primatol 76:730ā€“746. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22265

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Calenge C (2006) The package ā€œadehabitatā€ for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol Model 197:516ā€“519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.03.017

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chapman CA (1990) Association patterns of spider monkeys: the influence of ecology and sex on social organization. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:409ā€“414

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chapman CA, Chapman LJ (2000) Determinants of group size in social primates: the importance of travel costs. In: Boinski S, Garber PA (eds) On the move: how and why animals travel in groups. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 24ā€“42

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Wrangham R et al (1992) Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica 24:527ā€“531

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chapman CA, Chapman LJ, Wrangham RW (1995) Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:59ā€“70

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Crofoot MC, Gilby IC, Wikelski MC, Kays RW (2008) Interaction location outweighs the competitive advantage of numerical superiority in Cebus capucinus intergroup contests. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:577ā€“581. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707749105

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Defler TR (1996) Aspects of the ranging pattern in a group of wild woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha). Am J Primatol 38:289ā€“302

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Defler TR, Defler SB (1996) Diet of a group of Lagothrix lagothricha lagothricha in southeastern Colombia. Int J Primatol 17:161ā€“190

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dew JL (2005) Foraging, food choice, and food processing by sympatric ripe-fruit specialists: Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii and Ateles belzebuth belzebuth. Int J Primatol 26:1107ā€“1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-005-6461-5

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Di Fiore A (1997) Ecology and behavior of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii, Atelinae) in eastern Ecuador. University of California, Davis

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Di Fiore A (2003) Ranging behavior and foraging ecology of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) in YasunĆ­ National Park, Ecuador. Am J Primatol 59:47ā€“66. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.10065

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Di Fiore A (2004) Diet and feeding ecology of woolly monkeys in a western Amazonian rain forest. Int J Primatol 25:767ā€“801

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Di Fiore A, Rodman PS (2001) Time allocation patterns of lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) in a neotropical terra firma forest. Int J Primatol 22:449ā€“480

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Di Fiore A, Strier KB (2004) Flexibility in social organization in atelin primates. In: XXth Congress of the International Primatological Society. Folia Primatologica, Turin, Italy, p 140

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Di Fiore A, Link A, Schmitt CA, Spehar SN (2009) Dispersal patterns in sympatric woolly and spider monkeys: integrating molecular and observational data. Behaviour 146:437ā€“470

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Di Fiore A, Link A, Campbell C (2011) The atelines: behavioral an socioecological diversity in a New World monkey radiation. In: Primates in perspective. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 155ā€“188

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Dias LG, Strier KB (2003) Effects of group size on ranging patterns in Brachyteles arachnoides hypoxanthus. Int J Primatol 24:209ā€“221. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023054513354

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ellis K, Pain E, Schmitt CA, Di Fiore A (2014) Ranging and association patterns of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix poeppigii) in lowland Ecuador. Am J Phys Anthropol 153:119

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ellis K, Abondano L, Montes-Rojas A et al (in review) Reproductive seasonality in two sympatric primates (Ateles belzebuth and Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) from Amazonian Ecuador. Am J Primatol

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Fashing PJ (2001) Male and female strategies during intergroup encounters in guerezas Colobus guereza: evidence for resource defense mediated through males and a comparison with other primates. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:219ā€“230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650100358

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Fieberg J, Kochanny CO (2005) Quantifying home-range overlap: the importance of the utilization distribution. J Wildl Manag 69:1346ā€“1359. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1346:QHOTIO]2.0.CO;2

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ganas J, Robbins MM (2005) Ranging behavior of the mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: a test of the ecological constraints model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58:277ā€“288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0920-z

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Grueter CC, Chapais B, Zinner D (2012) Evolution of multilevel social systems in nonhuman primates and humans. Int J Primatol 33:1002ā€“1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-012-9618-z

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hashimoto C, Furuichi T, Tashiro Y (2001) What factors affect the size of chimpanzee parties in the Kalinzu Forest, Uganda? Examination of fruit abundance and number of estrous females. Int J Primatol 22:947ā€“959

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hurlbert SH (1978) The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology 59:67ā€“77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936632

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Isbell LA, Pruetz JD, Young TP (1998) Movements of vervets (Cercopithecus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) as estimators of food resource size, density, and distribution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:123ā€“133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050420

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Janson CH, Goldsmith ML (1995) Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risks. Behav Ecol 6:326ā€“336

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kavanagh M, Dresdale L (1975) Observations on the woolly monkey (Lagothrix lagothricha) in northern Colombia. Primates 16:285ā€“294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381556

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kays R, Crofoot MC, Jetz W, Wikelski M (2015) Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science 348:aaa2478. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa2478

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kenward RE, Hodder KH (1996) Ranges V. An analysis system for biological location data. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Dorset

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kie JG (2013) A rule-based ad hoc method for selecting a bandwidth in kernel home-range analyses. Anim Biotelemetry 1:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-3385-1-13

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kie JG, Matthiopoulos J, Fieberg J etĀ al (2010) The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:2221ā€“2231. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0093

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Klein LL, Klein DJ (1977) Feeding behaviour of the Colombian spider monkey, Ateles belzebuth. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology: studies in feeding and ranging behavior in lemurs, monkeys, and apes. Academic, London, pp 153ā€“181

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Koch F, Signer J, Kappeler PM, Fichtel C (2016) The role of the residence-effect on the outcome of intergroup encounters in Verreauxā€™s sifakas. Sci Rep 6:28457. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28457

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kummer H (1968) Social organization of hamadryas baboons. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kummer H (1971) Primate societies: group techniques of ecological adaptation. Aldine, Chicago

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2014) lmerTest: tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R. Package version 2.0-20. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html

  • Langrock R, Hopcraft JGC, Blackwell PG et al (2014)Ā Modelling group dynamic animal movement. Methods Ecol Evol 5:190ā€“199. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12155

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Laver PN, Kelly MJ (2008) A critical review of home range studies. J Wildl Manag 72:290ā€“298. https://doi.org/10.2193/2005-589

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lehmann J, Boesch C (2004) To fission or to fusion: effects of community size on wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) social organisation. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:207ā€“216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0781-x

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Link A (2011) Social and ecological determinants of ā€œfission-fusionā€ sociality and grouping strategies in the white bellied spider monkey (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) in a lowland rainforest in Western Amazonia. New York University, New York

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Link A, Galvis N, Fleming E, Di Fiore A (2011) Patterns of mineral lick visitation by spider monkeys and howler monkeys in Amazonia: are licks perceived as risky areas? Am J Primatol 73:386ā€“396. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20910

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Majolo B, Ventura R, Koyama NF (2005) Sex, rank and age differences in the Japanese macaque (Macaca fuscata yakui) participation in inter-group encounters. Ethology 111:455ā€“468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2005.01087.x

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Markham AC, Guttal V, Alberts SC, Altmann J (2013) When good neighbors donā€™t need fences: temporal landscape partitioning among baboon social groups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:875ā€“884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1510-0

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Matsumoto-Oda A, Hosaka K, Huffman MA, Kawanaka K (1998) Factors affecting party size in chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains. Int J Primatol 19:999ā€“1011. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020322203166

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Mitani JC, Watts DP, Lwanga JS (2002) In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant L (eds) Ecological and social correlates of chimpanzee party size and composition. Cambrige University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 102ā€“111

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nakamura M, Corp N, Fujimoto M et al (2013) Ranging behavior of Mahale chimpanzees: a 16 year study. Primates 54:171ā€“182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-012-0337-z

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nathan R, Getz WM, Revilla E et al (2008) A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research. PNAS pnas.0800375105. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800375105

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Newton-Fisher NE, Reynolds V, Plumptre AJ (2000) Food supply and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) party size in the Budongo forest reserve, Uganda. Int J Primatol 21:613ā€“628. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005561203763

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nishimura A (1990) A sociological and behavioral study of woolly monkeys, Lagothrix lagotricha, in the upper Amazon. Sci Eng Rev Doshisha Univ 31:87ā€“121

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nishimura A (1994) Social interaction patterns of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha): a comparison among the atelines. Sci Eng Rev Doshisha Univ 35:91ā€“110

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Nishimura A (2003) Reproductive parameters of wild female Lagothrix lagotricha. Int J Primatol 24:707ā€“722

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Peres CA (1994) Diet and feeding ecology of gray woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha cana) in central Amazonia: comparisons with other atelines. Int J Primatol 15:333ā€“372

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Peres CA (1996) Use of space, spatial group structure, and foraging group size of gray woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha cana) at Urucu, Brazil. In: Adaptive radiations of neotropical primates. Springer, New York, pp 467ā€“488

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ramos-FernĆ”ndez G (2005) Vocal communication in a fission-fusion society: do spider monkeys stay in touch with close associates? Int J Primatol 26:1077ā€“1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-005-6459-z

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Schmitt CA, Di Fiore A (2014) Life history, behavior, and development of wild immature lowland woolly monkeys (Lagothrix poeppigii) in Amazonian Ecuador. In: The woolly monkey. Springer, New York, pp 113ā€“146

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Seiler N, Boesch C, Mundry R et al (2017) Space partitioning in wild, non-territorial mountain gorillas: the impact of food and neighbours. R Soc Open Sci 4:170720. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170720

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  PubMed CentralĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Shanee S (2014) Ranging behaviour, daily path lengths, diet and habitat use of yellow-tailed woolly monkeys (Lagothrix flavicauda) at La Esperanza, Peru. In: Defler TR (ed) The woolly monkey: behavior, ecology, systematics, and captive research. Springer, New York, pp 167ā€“185

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Shimooka Y (2003) Seasonal variation in association patterns of wild spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) at La Macarena, Colombia. Primates 44:83ā€“90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-002-0028-2

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Snodderly, D.M., Ellis, K.M., Lieberman, S.R., Link., A., Fernandez-Duque, E., and Di Fiore, A. [in review]. Initiation of feeding by four sympatric Neotropical primates (Ateles belzebuth, Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii, Plecturocebus (Callicebus) discolor, and Pithecia aequatorialis) in Amazonian Ecuador: Relationships to photic and ecological factors. PLoS ONE

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Stevenson PR (1992) Diet of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha) at La Macarena, Colombia. Field Stud New World Monkeys Macarena Colomb 6:3ā€“14

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Stevenson PR (2004) Phenological patterns of woody vegetation at Tinigua Park, Colombia: methodological comparisons with emphasis on fruit production/Patrones fenolĆ³gicos de vegetaciĆ³n leƱosa en el Parque Tinigua, Colombia: comparaciones metodolĆ³gicas con Ć©nfasis en la producciĆ³n de frutos. Caldasia 26:125ā€“150

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Stevenson PR (2006) Activity and ranging patterns of Colombian woolly monkeys in North-Western Amazonia. Primates 47:239ā€“247

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Stevenson PR, Quinones MJ, Ahumada JA (1994) Ecological strategies of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha) at Tinigua National Park, Colombia. Am J Primatol 32:123ā€“140

    ArticleĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Symington MM (1987) Sex ratio and maternal rank in wild spider monkeys: when daughters disperse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:421ā€“425

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Symington MM (1990) Fission-fusion social organization in Ateles and Pan. Int J Primatol 11:47ā€“61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02193695

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Watts DP (1998) Long-term habitat use by mountain gorillas (Gorilla gorilla beringei). 1. Consistency, variation, and home range size and stability. Int J Primatol 19:651ā€“680. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020324909101

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Westley PAH, Berdahl AM, Torney CJ, Biro D (2018) Collective movement in ecology: from emerging technologies to conservation and management. Philos Trans R Soc B 373:20170004. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0004

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Whitehead H (2008) Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wrangham RW (1977) Feeding behavior of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology. Academic, London

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wrangham RW (1980) An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75:262ā€“300

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wrangham RW (1986) Ecology and social relationships in two species of chimpanzee. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecology and social evolution: birds and mammals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 352ā€“378

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Wrangham RW (2000) Why are male chimpanzees more gregarious than mothers? A scramble competition hypothesis. In: Kappeler PM (ed) Studies of feeding and ranging behavior in lemurs, monkeys, and apes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 248ā€“258

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ZĆ”rate DA, Stevenson PR (2014) Behavioral ecology and interindividual distance of woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagothricha) in a rainforest fragment in Colombia. In: The woolly monkey. Springer, New York, pp 227ā€“245

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Zhao Q-K (1997) Intergroup interactions in Tibetan macaques at Mt. Emei, China. Am J Phys Anthropol 104:459ā€“470. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199712)104:4<459::AID-AJPA3>3.0.CO;2-N

    ArticleĀ  CASĀ  PubMedĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Ecuadorian government and the Ministerio de Ambiente for permission to work in the YasunĆ­ region and the wonderful directors and staff of the Universidad San Francisco de Quito and Tiputini Biodiversity Station for facilitating our primatological research at the site. Special thanks are due to David and Consuelo Romo, Kelly Swing, Diego Mosquera, Gaby Vinueza, Tomi Sugahara, Majo RendĆ³n, and all of the stationā€™s ā€œtigresā€ who have provided immeasurable logistical support and friendship to our research team in the field. We are grateful for the hard work and dedication of many of our fellow Proyecto Primates team members (Laura Abondano, Rebekah Ellis, Miguel GarcĆ­a, Nausica de Gibert, Janel Mayo, Pearson McGovern, Lucy Millington, Evelyn Pain, SebastiĆ”n RamĆ­rez, Robyn Reeder, Kelly Sampeck) who spent extended periods in the field collecting the behavioral and phenological data on which the study relies. We further thank our colleagues Becca Lewis, Mariah Hopkins, AndrĆ©s Link, and DennĆ© Reed who assisted with the design of this study and Maryjka Blaszczyk and Amanda Perofsky who provided helpful editorial comments in the early stages of writing. This research was funded by NSF BCS-1062540, NSF BCS-1540403, NSF BCS-1638822; the Wenner-Gren, L.S.B. Leakey, and Nacey Maggioncalda Foundations; the National Geographic Society; the Explorers Club; Idea Wild; New York University; and the University of Texas at Austin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelsey Ellis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Table 10.5 Candidate models and subsequent selection (in bold) examining the influence of group size (GS), subgroup size (SGS), fruit availability (FA), and mating opportunity index (MO) on estimates of subgrouping behavior, within-group cohesion, ranging patterns, and range overlap. Random effects include group ID (ID) and the combination of month and year (MY) data was collected. Models are ranked from lowest AICc to highest

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ellis, K., Di Fiore, A. (2019). Variation in Space Use and Social Cohesion Within and Between Four Groups of Woolly Monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha poeppigii) in Relation to Fruit Availability and Mating Opportunities at the Tiputini Biodiversity Station, Ecuador. In: Reyna-Hurtado, R., Chapman, C. (eds) Movement Ecology of Neotropical Forest Mammals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03463-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics