Skip to main content

The Myth of the Dark Side of the Energiewende

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The European Dimension of Germany’s Energy Transition

Abstract

Germany’s large-scale deployment of RES-based power generation has not resulted in a significant decline of its energy-related CO2 emissions. The reason for this emissions trend was the constantly high level of coal-fired power generation in Germany. Consequently, it has been argued that the German coal binge may be the “dark side” of the Energiewende. We point out that this argumentation is flawed. In fact, the increase in coal-fired generation has been strongly driven by developments on international fuel and carbon markets—and not only, if at all, by the phase-out of nuclear and ongoing RES deployment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AGEB. (2017). Auswertungstabellen zur Energiebilanz Deutschland – 1990 bis 2016. Berlin: Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen (AGEB) e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arte. (2014, March 30). Deutschland: Die Energie-Wende und die Sorben. Retrieved January 21, 2015, from http://info.arte.tv/de/deutschland-die-energie-wende-und-die-sorben

  • BAFA. (2018). Drittlandskohlepreis. Eschborn: Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle (BAFA). Retrieved February 19, 2018, from http://www.bafa.de/DE/Energie/Rohstoffe/Drittlandskohlepreis/drittlandskohlepreis_node.html

  • BMWi. (2016). Fifth “energy transition” monitoring report: The energy of the future. 2015 reporting year. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi).

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer, C., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2010). Green Promotes the Dirtiest: On the Interaction between Black and Green Quotas in Energy Markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 37, 316–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer, C., & Rosendahl, K. E. (2011). Greening electricity more than necessary: On the cost implications of overlapping regulation in EU climate policy. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 131, 469–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruninx, K., Madzharov, D., Delarue, E., & D’haeseleer, W. (2013). Impact of the German nuclear phase-out on Europe’s electricity generation—A comprehensive study. Energy Policy, 60, 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEX. (2018). European emission allowances. Leipzig: European Energy Exchange (EEX). Retrieved February 19, 2018, from https://www.eex.com/de/marktdaten/umweltprodukte/spotmarkt/european-emission-allowances%2D%2D-global-environmental-exchange/47258#!/2018/02/19

  • Gawel, E., Lehmann, P., Korte, K., Strunz, S., Bovet, J., Köck, W., Massier, P., Löschel, A., Schober, D., Ohlhorst, D., Tews, K., Schreurs, M., Reeg, M., & Wassermann, S. (2014a). The future of the energy transition in Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 4, 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawel, E., Strunz, S., & Lehmann, P. (2014b). A public choice view on the climate and energy policy mix in the EU—How do the emissions trading scheme and support for renewable energies interact? Energy Policy, 64, 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guardian. (2014, August 27). New coal power stations threat to EU’s emissions target. Retrieved February 5, 2018, from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/aug/27/coal-power-stations-eu-emissions-target

  • Hintermann, B., Peterson, S., & Rickels, W. (2016). Price and market behavior in Phase II of the EU ETS: A review of the literature. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 10, 108–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppmann, J., Huenteler, J., & Girod, B. (2014). Compulsive policy-making—The evolution of the German feed-in tariff system for solar photovoltaic power. Research Policy, 43, 1422–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2016). Coal medium-term market report 2016 – executive summary. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, C., & Becker, S. (2014). Energy democracy in Europe: A survey and outlook, july 2014, energy democracy in Europe: A survey and outlook. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, P., & Gawel, E. (2013). Why should support schemes for renewable electricity complement the EU emissions trading scheme? Energy Policy, 52, 597–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, P., Gawel, E., & Strunz, S. (2019). EU climate and energy policy beyond 2020: Are additional targets and instruments for renewables economically reasonable? In E. Gawel, S. Strunz, P. Lehmann, & A. Purkus (Eds.), The European dimension of Germany’s energy transition: Opportunities and conflicts. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Geographic. (2014, February 13). Germany plans to raze towns for brown coal and cheap energy. Retrieved February 04, 2018, from https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2014/02/140211-germany-plans-to-raze-towns-for-brown-coal/

  • New York Times. (2014, February 19). German village resists plans to strip it away from the coal underneath. Retrieved February 2, 2018, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/19/world/europe/german-village-resists-plans-to-strip-it-away-for-the-coal-underneath.html?_r=0

  • Nicolosi, M. (2010). Wind power integration and power system flexibility – An empirical analysis of extreme events in Germany under the new negative price regime. Energy Policy, 38, 7257–7268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahle, M. (2010). Germany’s dash for coal: Exploring drivers and factors. Energy Policy, 38, 3431–3442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Chewpreecha, U., Mercure, J.-F., & Pollitt, H. (2019). EU climate and energy policy beyond 2020: Is a single target for GHG reduction sufficient? In E. Gawel, S. Strunz, P. Lehmann, & A. Purkus (Eds.), The European dimension of Germany’s energy transition: Opportunities and conflicts. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strunz, S., Gawel, E., & Lehmann, P. (2015). Towards a general “Europeanization” of EU member states’ energy policies? Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 4, 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strunz, S., Gawel, E., & Lehmann, P. (2016). The political economy of renewable energy policies in Germany and the EU. Utilities Policy, 42, 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UBA. (2017). National trend tables for the German atmospheric emission reporting 1990–2015. Dessau: Umweltbundesamt (UBA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueckerdt, F., Hirth, L., Luderer, G., & Edenhofer, O. (2013). System LCOE: What are the costs of variable renewables? Energy, 63, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Lehmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kunze, C., Lehmann, P. (2019). The Myth of the Dark Side of the Energiewende . In: Gawel, E., Strunz, S., Lehmann, P., Purkus, A. (eds) The European Dimension of Germany’s Energy Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03374-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03374-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-03373-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-03374-3

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics