Skip to main content

Measurement of Stress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stress and Somatic Symptoms
  • 1185 Accesses

Abstract

The assessment of stress is essential in clinical approaches as well as in psychosomatic research, particularly for exploring the relationship between stress and diseases. Such assessment has been done in terms of stimulus-oriented, response-oriented, and interaction-oriented measurement. Three categories of variables which need to be assessed are stressors, stress responses (cognitive, physiological, and behavioral), and personal characteristics (personal resources, behavioral patterns, and coping styles). The purpose of stress assessment in these three aspects is to make clear the client’s problem areas and help the therapist plan therapeutic approaches appropriately. In addition, such assessment can be used to evaluate changes between pre-treatment and posttreatment states. There are three approaches to stress measurement, such as interview, paper-and-pencil measures (use of rating scales or checklists), and direct observation. Each of these approaches has its own strength and weakness. Therefore, the therapist needs to be aware of both the strengths and weaknesses of the assessment tools to select the tool specifically fit for the individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Derogatis LR, Coons HL. Self-report measures of stress. In: Goldberg L, Breznitz S, editors. Handbook of stress – theoretical and clinical aspects. 2nd ed. New York: The Free Press; 1993. p. 200–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. 1967;1:213–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lazarus RS. Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vingerhoets AJ, Marcelissen FH. Stress research: its present status and issues for future developments. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26:279–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delongis A, Coyne JC, Dakof G, et al. Relationship of daily hassles uplifts and major life events to health status. Health Psychol. 1982;1:119–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazarus RA, Delongis A. Psychological stress and coping in aging. Am Psychol. 1983;38:245–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cannon WB. Bodily changes in fear, hunger, pain, and rage: an account of recent researches into the function of emotional excitement. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton; 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cannon WB. The wisdom of the body. 2nd ed. New York: Norton; 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Selye H. The physiology and pathology of exposure to stress. Montreal: Acta; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Selye H. The evolution of the stress concept. Am J Cardiol. 1970;26:289–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazarus RS. Patterns of adjustment. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lazarus RS. The stress and coping paradigm. In: Edisdorfer C, Cohen D, Kleinman A, et al., editors. Models for clinical psychopathology. New York: Spectrum; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Linn MW. A global assessment of recent stress (GARS) scale. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1985;15:47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Derogatis LR, Rickels K, Rock AF. The SCL-90 and MMPI: a step in the validation of a new report scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1976;128:280–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Covi L. SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale: preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1973;9:13–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koh KB, Park JK, Kim CH, et al. Development of the stress response inventory and its application in clinical practice. Psychosom Med. 2001;63:668–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beck AT, Ward C, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RC, Lushene RE. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jenkins CD, Rosenman RH, Friedman M. Development of an objective psychological test for the determination of the coronary-prone behavior pattern in employed men. J Chronic Dis. 1967;20:371–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav. 1980;21:219–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cotton DHG. Stress management: an integrated approach to therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel; 1990. p. 80–110.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kanner AD, Coyne JC, Schaefer C, et al. Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. J Behav Med. 1981;4:1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weissman AN. Assessing depressogenic attitudes: a validation study. Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Hartford; 1980

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shorkey CT, Whiteman VL. Development of the rational behavior inventory: initial validity and reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1977;37:527–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zung WK. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12:371–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koh KB, Park JK, Cho SH. Development of the somatic stress response scale and its application in clinical practice. Yonsei Med J. 2005;46:614–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Meichenbaum D. A cognitive-behavior modification approach to assessment. In: Hersen M, Bellack AS, editors. Behavioral assessment: a practical handbook. New York: Pergamon Press; 1976. p. p143–71.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hollon SD, Kendall PC. Cognitive self-statements in depression: development of an automatic thoughts questionnaire. Cogn Ther Res. 1980;4:383–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwartz GE, Davidson RJ, Goleman DT. Patterning of cognitive and somatic processes in self-regulation of anxiety: effects of meditation versus exercise. Psychosom Med. 1978;40:321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hartman LM. Cognitive components of anxiety. J Clin Psychol. 1984;40:137–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Koh KB, Park JK, Cho SH. Development of the stress-induced cognition scale. Yonsei Med J. 2006;47:384–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gambrill ED, Richey CA. An assertion inventory for use in assessment and research. Behav Ther. 1975;6:550–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hersen M, Bellack AS. Behavioral assessment: a practical handbook. New York: Peragamon Press; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Levenstein S, Prantera C, Varvo M, et al. Development of the perceived stress questionnaire: a new tool for psychosomatic research. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37:19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Spielberger CD. Manual for the state-trait anger expression inventory–2. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, et al. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;50:992–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Koh KB, Park JK. Development of the anger coping scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2005;44:477–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Stress Response Inventory

Stress Response Inventory

DIRECTIONS: A number of statements which people have used to describe themselves under stress are given below. Read each statement carefully, and then circle under the statement that best indicates how you have been feeling or what you have been experiencing during the past seven (7) days including today. There are no right or wrong answers. Do not spend too much time on any one statement, but make sure to answer all the given statements. One example is given below.

(Example)

 

Not at all

Somewhat

Moderately

Very much

Absolutely

I have no appetite

  

       ○

  

********

 

Not at all

Somewhat

Moderately

Very much

Absolutely

1. I make many mistakes at work

     

2. I don’t feel like talking

     

3. My chest feels tight

     

4. I feel angry

     

5. I feel agitated and restless

     

6. I suffer from indigestion

     

7. My stomach hurts

     

8. I feel like screaming

     

9. I often sigh

     

10. I feel dizzy

     

11. Everything bothers me

     

12. I have distracting thoughts

     

13. I am easily fatigued

     

14. I feel totally exhausted

     

15. I have lost my self-confidence

     

16. I feel tense

     

17. My body trembles

     

18. I feel like hitting someone

     

19. I have lost incentive to do anything

     

20. I feel like crying

     

21. I feel on edge

     

22. I have no future in my current work

     

23. I often stare blankly

     

24. I hate someone

     

25. I can’t get that thought out of my head

     

26. My voice is louder than it usually is

     

27. I easily get impatient

     

28. I act violently (such as reckless driving, cursing, fighting)

     

29. I feel like breaking something

     

30. I talk less than I used to

     

31. My head hurts or it feels heavy

     

32. My heart throbs

     

33. I feel like killing someone

     

34. My face gets flushed or it feels hot

     

35. I feel bored

     

36. I have lost my patience

     

37. My face looks rigid

     

38. I am useless (or unworthy)

     

39. I don’t like moving any part of my body

     

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Koh, K.B. (2018). Measurement of Stress. In: Stress and Somatic Symptoms. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02783-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics