Skip to main content

Abstract

We have seen that for Dewey, the classical argument in favor of the theoretic life is rendered obsolete by the reality of modern progress. The scientific and technological revolutions represent “an advance so marvelous that the progress in knowledge in almost uncounted previous millenniums is almost nothing in comparison.” The theory of progress – itself a fruit of Baconianism and the Enlightenment – poses the central challenge to any traditional view which venerates the classical ideals of the past. There are however a number of issues with this notion of progress. The first thing is that the scientific revolution itself cannot be set against the classical theoretical ideal, because it was built on it as its own foundation. It is true that the Greeks possessed no scientific-technological project comparable to what emerges in modernity. At the same time, what was absolutely necessary for this project was a product of the Greek theoretical mind. The modern scientific method brings together the Aristotelian principle of empirical induction with an advanced mathematics developed largely on the foundation of Greek mathematics (Euclid, Diophantus, etc.…). This debt was, as we have seen, acknowledged by Aristotle’s putative anti-type Bacon when he wrote of Aristotle:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dewey , 267.

  2. 2.

    Robert Hutchins . “The Great Conversation” at http://blogs.britannica.com/wp-content/pdf/The_Great_Conversation.pdf (accessed 5/19/2017). https://archive.org/stream/worksfrancisbaco02bacoiala/worksfrancisbaco02bacoiala_djvu.txt – acces date 11/12/2015.

  3. 3.

    The quote comes from a report summing up faculty position by a Chemistry Professor A.W. Hoffman of Oct 15, 1880 cited in Richard Winn Livingstone. A Defence of Classical Education . (London, UK: Macmillan Press, 1917 – reprinted by Forgotten Books): 6–7.

  4. 4.

    The claim is made by E. Christian Kopf. “Greek to Us: The Death of Classical Education and its Consequences”. http://www.theimaginativeconservative.org/2012/03/greek-to-us-death-of-classical.html (Accessed March 8, 2017).

  5. 5.

    In Kramnick, 26.

  6. 6.

    Ibid. 982b.

  7. 7.

    Nicholas Berdyaev . The Fate of Man in the Modern World.(London, UK: Student Christian Movement Press,1935 reprinted n the USA): 112.

  8. 8.

    Marrou. 222.

  9. 9.

    Aristotle. Metaphysics.

  10. 10.

    Paul Oskar Kristeller. “Humanism ” in Minerva, Vol. 16, No. 4 (Winter, 1978): 587 and A,J. Clark “Renaissance Court Schools” in The New Catholic Encyclopedia . Volume 12. (Washington, D.C.: CUA Press, 1967): 369 and.

  11. 11.

    From Protrepticus, B42 quoted A.W. Nightingale(ed.) Spectacles of Truth in Classical Greek Philosophy, (Cambridge University Press, 2004):194 (Greek texts removed).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rosenthal-Pubul, A.S. (2018). A Reply to Dewey. In: The Theoretic Life - A Classical Ideal and its Modern Fate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02281-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics