Skip to main content

Usability Assessment as a Guide to Improve the System Design of a Corneal Topographer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2018)

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the efficiency, efficacy and satisfaction of a redesigned portable corneal topography system to identify design solutions for system improvement. Twelve participants had to complete different tasks interacting with the software and the other elements of the system in a controlled scenario. After, a Retrospective Think Aloud was carried out focusing on the most challenging tasks during the system interaction. Finally, a satisfaction questionnaire was used to assess user perception. The most frequent errors and difficulties were identified along with the participants’ insights into the design elements for improvement of the system. Design solutions were generated to address software deficiencies and to improve the design of all aspects of the system. Usability analysis of software showed high relevance in the correct usage of the entire system, and along with the quick guide provides most of the feedback to understand the proper use of the handheld device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brooke, R.E., Isherwood, S., Herbert, N.C., Raynor, D.K., Knapp, P.: Hearing aid instruction booklets: employing usability testing to determine effectiveness. Am. J. Audiol. 21(2), 206–214 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fries, R.C.: Reliable Design of Medical Devices. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiklund, M.E., Kendler, J., Strochlic, A.Y.: Usability Testing of Medical Devices. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams, A.: Usability testing in information design. In: Zwaga, H., Boersema, T., Hoonhout, H. (eds.) Visual Information for Everyday Use: Design and Research Perspectives, pp. 3–20. CRC Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aceves-González, C., Galindo-Estupiñan, Z.T., Landa-Avila, I.C., Díaz-Gutiérrez, C., Prado-Jiménez, S.D.: Usability assessment of a portable corneal topography device. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 639–650. Springer, Cham (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paz, F., Pow-Sang, J.A.: A systematic mapping review of usability evaluation methods for software development process. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 10(1), 165–178 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leventhal, L., Barnes, J.: Usability Engineering: Process, Products and Examples. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, J.R.: IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 7(1), 57–78 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. De Leon Zuloaga, C.D.: Evaluación del efecto de tres tipos de interfaz en la usabilidad de una receta en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2, Tesis de Maestría en Ergonomía. Universidad de Guadalajara, México (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vu, K.P.L., Proctor, R.W.: Handbook of Human Factors in Web Design. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hutchins, E.L., Hollan, J.D., Norman, D.A.: Direct manipulation interfaces. Hum. Comput. Interact. 1(4), 311–338 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Myers, B.A., Bhatnagar, R., Nichols, J., Peck, C.H., Kong, D., Miller, R., Long, A.C.: Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 33–40. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jordan, P.W.: An Introduction to Usability. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saffer, D.: Microinteractions: Designing with Details. O’Reilly Media Inc., Sebastopol (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ganier, F.: Factors affecting the processing of procedural instructions: implications for document design. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 47(1), 15–26 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

CONACYT supported this work through the Fondo de Innovación Tecnológica FIT [grant number ECO-2016-C01-274898]. We thank Oscar A. Ramos Montes and Esther Alejandra Malagon Rojas from the FESI, UNAM for helping with the process of participant recruitment and managing the facilities to run this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Aceves-Gonzalez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aceves-Gonzalez, C., de Leon-Zuloaga, C.D., Galindo-Estupiñan, Z.T., Díaz-Gutierrez, C. (2019). Usability Assessment as a Guide to Improve the System Design of a Corneal Topographer. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design. IHSED 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_55

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics