Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 875))

Abstract

Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN) provide a comprehensible framework for representing complex systems that allows including expert knowledge and statistical data simultaneously. We explored BBN models for estimating risky behavior rate and compared several network structures, both expert-based and data-based. To learn and evaluate models we used generated behavior data with 9393 observations. We applied both score-based and constraint-based structure learning algorithms. The score-based structures represented better quality scores according to BIC and log-likelihood, prediction quality was almost the same for data-based models and lower but sufficient for expert-based models. Hence, in case of limited data we can reduce computations and apply expert-based structure for solving practical issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barton, D.N., Benjamin, T., Cerdan, C.R., DeClerck, F., Madsen, A.L., Rusch, G.M., Villanueva, C.: Assessing ecosystem services from multifunctional trees in pastures using Bayesian belief networks. Ecosyst. Serv. 18, 165–174 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boets, P., Landuyt, D., Everaert, G., Broekx, S., Goethals, P.L.: Evaluation and comparison of data-driven and knowledge-supported Bayesian Belief Networks to assess the habitat suitability for alien macroinvertebrates. Environ. Model. Softw. 74, 92–103 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu, Z., Wang, W., Wang, B., Zhuang, J.: Research on factors influencing municipal household solid waste separate collection: Bayesian belief networks. Sustainability 8(2), 152 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Darwiche, A.: Modelling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Kabir, G., Tesfamariam, S., Francisque, A., Sadiq, R.: Evaluating risk of water mains failure using a Bayesian belief network model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 240(1), 220–234 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Margaritis, D.: Learning Bayesian network model structure from data, Ph.D. thesis. Carnegie-Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Pittsburgh (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2017). http://www.R-project.org/

  9. Scutari, M.: Learning Bayesian networks with the bnlearn R package. arXiv preprint arXiv:0908.3817 (2009)

  10. Spiegelman, D., Hertzmark, E.: Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am. J. Epidemiol. 162(3), 199–200 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stepanov, D.V., Musina, V.F., Suvorova, A.V., Tulupyev, A.L., Sirotkin, A.V., Tulupyeva, T.V.: Risky behavior Poisson model identification: heterogeneous arguments in likelihood. Trudy SPIIRAN [SPIIRAS Proceedings], vol. 23, pp. 157–184 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Su, C., Andrew, A., Karagas, M.R., Borsuk, M.E.: Using Bayesian networks to discover relations between genes, environment, and disease. BioData Mining 6(1), 6 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suvorova, A.V., Tulupyev, A.L., Sirotkin, A.V.: Bayesian belief networks for risky behavior rate estimates. Nechetkie sistemy i myagkie vychisleniya [Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing] 9(2), 115–129 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Suvorova, A., Tulupyev, A.L.: Evaluation of the model for individual behavior rate estimate: social network data. In: 2016 XIX IEEE International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements (SCM), pp. 18–20. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suvorova, A., Tulupyeva, T.: Bayesian belief networks in risky behavior modelling. In: Proceedings of the First International Scientific Conference Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry (IITI 2016), pp. 95–102. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the by RFBR according to the research project No. 16-31-60063 and No. 18-01-00626.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alena Suvorova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Suvorova, A., Tulupyev, A. (2019). Learning Bayesian Network Structure for Risky Behavior Modelling. In: Abraham, A., Kovalev, S., Tarassov, V., Snasel, V., Sukhanov, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’18). IITI'18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 875. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01821-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics