Skip to main content

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANN) are well-known effective parallel systems which have successfully approved themselves in solving of complicated artificial intelligence problems. The practice of the widespread ANN application due to their high efficiency in solving non-formalized or hard-formalized problems associated with the need for ANN training on experimental material particularly in pattern recognition. In solving problems of pattern recognition the feedforward neural network is usually used due to the simplicity of algorithmic implementation, the availability of advanced training methods, the possibilities of multi-parallel computations. When neural network classifier implementing within decision support systems, it is necessary to assess the ANN results reliability based upon interpretation of the output signals to establish trust between users and the neural network algorithm. In this paper the ANN output results reliability evaluation method in terms of the degree of belonging of the recognized patterns to the originally specified classes is considered. The proposed method is based on the computation of Euclidean distance between the actual ANN output vector characterizing the class of the object recognition and a set of sample vectors defining a priori known classes at the training stage followed by its evaluation by the curve construction of the normal probability distribution law coinciding with the Gaussian function. A feature of this method is the construction of an individual probability distribution curve computed for each ANN output vector. An experimental research of the proposed method in MATLAB is presented on the example of solving the known Fisher’s Iris Database classification for input data without noise and with noise. The obtained results confirm the adequacy of the proposed method which can be used both in independent neural network pattern recognition systems and within decision support complexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Khong, L.M.D., Gale, T.J., Jiang, D., Olivier, J.C., Ortiz-Catalan, M.: Multi-layer perceptron training algorithms for pattern recognition of myoelectric signals. In: Proceedings of 6th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON-2013), pp. 1–5. IEEE, Piscataway (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Fatlawi, A.H., Ling, S.H., Lam, H.K.: A comparison of neural classifiers for graffiti recognition. J. Intell. Learn. Syst. Appl. 6(2), 94–112 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lipton, Z.C.: The mythos of model interpretability. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ICML Workshop on Human Interpretability in Machine Learning (WHI-2016), New York, NY (2016). arXiv:1606.03490

  4. Kotenko, I.V., Shorov, A.V., Nesteruk, P.G.: Analysis of bio-inspired approaches for protection of computer systems and networks. SPIIRAS Proc. 3(18), 19–73 (2011). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benitez, J.M., Castro, J.L., Requena, I.: Are artificial neural networks black boxes? IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 8(5), 1156–1164 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chorowski, J., Zurada, J.M.: Extracting rules from neural networks as decision diagrams. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 22(12), 2435–2446 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Marshakov, D.V.: About the method of probabilistic interpretation for the results of the artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of the VII International Workshop “Sistemnyy analiz, upravleniye i obrabotka informatsii”, pp. 102–106. Don State Technical University, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation (2016). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kachaykin, E.I., Ivanov, A.I., Bezyaev, A.V., Perfilov, K.A.: Reliability estimation of the automated neural network expertise of authorship hand-written handwriting. Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti 2(10), 43–48 (2015). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Savchenko, A.V.: Statistical pattern recognition based on probabilistic neural network with homogeneity testing. Knowl. Acquis. Autom. Reason. 4, 45–56 (2013). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chauhan, S., Goel, V., Dhingra, S.: Pattern recognition system using MLP neural networks. IOSR J. Eng. 2(5), 990–993 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma, L., Sharma, U.: Neural network based classifier (pattern recognition) for classification of iris data set. Int. J. Recent Dev. Eng. Technol. 3(2), 64–66 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniil V. Marshakov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marshakov, D.V., Galushka, V.V., Fathi, V.A., Fathi, D.V. (2019). Evaluation of Neural Network Output Results Reliability in Pattern Recognition. In: Abraham, A., Kovalev, S., Tarassov, V., Snasel, V., Sukhanov, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’18). IITI'18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 874. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01818-4_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics