Skip to main content

Simulating: Bridging the Gap Between Practice and Theory in Higher Professional Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter draws on three case studies of higher education courses conducted as part of the larger research project Quality of Norwegian Higher Education: Pathways, Practices and Performances. These cases had important elements of simulation in their curriculum as part of their nursing, law and management studies. We look more closely into how simulations are designed and used in these courses. The overall questions are: How are simulations used in these teaching practices, and in what ways do they serve to bridge the gap between theory and practice? Nursing education use sophisticated manikins, manipulated by specially trained nurses who interact with nursing students through, predominantly digital technologies as well as tactile hardware. They pose challenges to the students who try to develop mastery of procedures and handle the uncertainties that follow a “true” nursing situation. The management education course used a role play developed in-house with the purpose of training students to perform interviews and selecting candidates for hiring. The setup for simulation in law studies was to establish a stage for a trial court room, with students filling the roles of prosecutors and defenders and members of the audience. We discuss how the cases display risks and promises for the use of simulations in teaching practices in higher education, especially where potentials for knowledge integration are concerned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The project is financed by the Research Council of Norway (2014–2017) and is led from the research institute NIFU in collaboration with the Department of Education, University of Oslo. More information about the methodology and findings from the case studies is available in Nerland and Prøitz (2018).

References

  • Bradley, P. (2006). The history of simulation on medical education and possible future directions. Medical Education, 40(3), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02394.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colley, S. (2003). Nursing theory: Its importance to practice. Nursing Standard, 17(46), 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croxford, L. (2001). Global university education: Some cultural considerations. Higher Education in Europe, 26(1), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Y. M., & Higgins, N. (2011). The place and efficacy of simulations in legal education: A preliminary examination. AISHE-J, 3(2), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damsa, C., de Lange, T., Elken, M, Esterhazy, R., Fossland, T., Frølich, N., …, Aamodt, P. O. (2015). Quality in Norwegian higher education: A review of research on aspects affecting student learning. NIFU Report 2015: 24. Oslo: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2008). Learning from other people in the workplace. In K. Hall, P. Murphy, & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 40–57). Los Angeles: Sage and The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresalfi, M., & Barab, S. (2011). Learning for a reason: Supporting forms of engagement by designing tasks and orchestrating environments. Theory into Practice, 50(4), 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, J. (2010). Understanding academic drift: On the institutional dynamics of higher technical and professional education. Minerva, 48(4), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9156-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, N. (2017). Practice architectures of simulation pedagogy: From fidelity to transformation. In K. Mahon, S. Francisco, & S. Kemmis (Eds.), Exploring education and professional practice (pp. 63–81). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, P. R. (2005). A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating: Simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26(2), 96–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, S., Skyttermoen, T., & Syversen, T. L. (2013). I pose og sekk? Mot en prakademisk utdanning i organisasjons- og ledelsesfag—et studieutviklingsprosjekt som ble «kronet med gull» [Report from the design of a ‘pracademic’ program in management education]. In I. G. Bjørke, O. Eikeland, & H. Jarning (Eds.), Ny Praksis—ny kunnskap (pp. 211–226). Oslo: ABM Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskitalo, T., & Ruokamo, H. (2016). Students’ expectations and experiences of meaningful simulation-based medical education. Seminar.net. International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 12(2), 110–123. Retrieved from http://seminar.net/104-frontpage/269-students-expectations-and-experiences-of-meaningful-simulation-based-medical-education

  • Keys, B., & Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management game and simulation in education and research. Journal of Management, 16(2), 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2006). Mutual subversion: A short history of the liberal and the professional in American higher education. History of Education Quarterly, 46(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markauskaite, L., & Goodyear, P. (2016). Epistemic fluency and professional education. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCHE (The Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions). (2016). Kvalitet i praksisstudiene i helse- og sosialfaglig høyere utdanning: Praksisprosjektet. [Quality in the practice studies in health and social provision higher education. The practice project]. Oslo: Universitets- og høgskolerådet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerland, M., & Prøitz, T. S., Eds. (2018, January). Quality in higher education: Case studies of educational practices in eight courses. NIFU Report 2018:1. Oslo: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOU. (2015: 3). Advokaten i samfunnet—Lov om advokater og andre som yter rettslig bistand [The Lawyer in Society—The Law concerning lawyers and others who provide legal advice]. Oslo: Ministry of Justice and Public Security.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rall, M., & Dieckmann, P. (2005). Safety culture and crisis resource management in airway management: General principles to enhance patient safety in critical airway situations. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 19(4), 539–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid-Searl, K., Eaton, A., Vieth, L., & Happell, B. (2011). The educator inside the patient: Students’ insights into the use of high fidelity silicone patient simulation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(19–20), 2752–2760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03795.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D., & Greene, L. (2011). The theatre of high-fidelity simulation education. Nurse Education Today, 31(7), 694–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rule, A. C. (2006). Editorial: The components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, D. W. (2012). Models of situated action: Computer games and the problem of transfer. In C. Steinkuehler, K. Squire, & S. Barab (Eds.), Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age (pp. 403–431). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (2002). Making differences. A table of learning. Change, 34(6), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C. A. (2004). The meaning of curriculum: Content to be covered or stories to be heard. Journal of Nursing Education, 43(1), 383–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, P. J., & Unwin, D. (1969). Simulation and gaming in education. London: Methuen Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H., & Wilson, A. D. (2011). “Physics envy”, cognitive legitimacy or practical relevance: Dilemmas in the evolution of management research in the UK. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosterud, R. (2015a). Simulation used as a learning approach in nursing education. Students’ experiences and validation of evaluation questionnaires. Doctoral thesis, Karlstad University Studies, 2015: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosterud, R. (2015b). Simulering—en hensiktsmessig læringsmetode? [Simulating—A productive learning approach?]. In T. Ødegården, S. Struksnes, & B. Hofmann (Eds.), Pasientsimulering i helsefag: en praktisk innføring (pp. 78–87). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Bærøe Nerland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nordkvelle, Y., Stalheim, O.R., Fossland, T., de Lange, T., Wittek, A.L., Nerland, M.B. (2019). Simulating: Bridging the Gap Between Practice and Theory in Higher Professional Education. In: Trimmer, K., Newman, T., Padró, F. (eds) Ensuring Quality in Professional Education Volume I. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01096-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01096-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01095-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01096-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics