Abstract
Continuous automated ST-segment analysis during thoracic surgery is especially important given the potential for cardiac ischemia, arrhythmias, and hemodynamic instability. Oxygenation during one-lung ventilation is determined by many factors including cardiac output, blood pressure, ventilation-perfusion matching, anesthetic effects on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, airway mechanics and reactivity, oxygen consumption, and preexisting pulmonary disease. Pulse oximetry with occasional intermittent arterial blood gas analysis provides warning of significant hypoxemia. The typical CO2 vs. time waveform, displayed on most anesthesia monitors, has characteristic intervals that represent different physiologic events during ventilation. Continuous breath-by-breath spirometry (monitoring of inspiratory and expiratory volumes, pressures, and flows) enables the early detection of a malpositioned double-lumen tube and can reduce the potential for ventilatory-induced lung injury by guiding the optimization of ventilatory settings. Invasive arterial pressure monitoring is commonly used to assess beat-by-beat blood pressure, and it can also be used to derive functional hemodynamic information. However, systolic pressure variation (SPV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) can reflect fluid responsiveness by measurement of cardiorespiratory interaction at controlled mechanical ventilation with tidal volumes >8 cc/kg, but most thoracic surgical operations are conducted with lower tidal volumes, and hence SVV and PPV do not have the ability to reveal fluid responsiveness. Minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring (such as the esophageal Doppler, arterial pressure waveform-based devices, and/or central venous oximetry) may be coupled with certain maneuvers to identify whether “flow (cardiac output) is adequate to meet global tissue demands” during and after surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Wendon J. Cost effectiveness of monitoring techniques. In: Pinsky MR, Payen D, editors. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2005.
Grocott MPW, Mythen MG, Gan TJ. Perioperative fluid management and clinical outcomes in adults. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1093–106.
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–77.
Sandham JD, Hull RD, Brant RF, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:5–14.
Kaplan J, Slinger P, editors. Thoracic anesthesia. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2006.
Schroeder RA, Barbeito A, Bar-Yosef S, Mark JB. Cardiovascular monitoring. In: Miller R, Eriksson L, Fleisher L, Wiener-Kronish J, Young W, editors. Miller’s anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2010. p. 1267–328.
Anesthesiology 1988 Aug;69(2):232-41. Intraoperative myocardial ischemia: localization by continuous 12-lead electrocardiography. London MJ1, Hollenberg M, Wong MG, Levenson L, Tubau JF, Browner W, Mangano DT.
Landesberg G, Mosseri M, Wolf Y, Vesselov Y, Weissman C. Perioperative myocardial ischemia and infarction. Identification by continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram with online ST-segment monitoring. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:264–70.
Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:481–7.
Cannesson M, Delannoy B, Morand A, et al. Does the Pleth variability index indicate the respiratory-induced variation in the plethysmogram and arterial pressure waveforms? Anesth Analg. 2008;106(4):1189–94.
Natalini G, Rosano A, Taranto M, et al. Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients: a clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2006;103(6):1478–84.
Brodsky JB, Shulman MS, Swan M, Mark JBD (1985) Pulse oximetry during onelung ventilation. Anesthesiology 63:212—214
Perel A. Automated assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(4):1031–3.
Components of a time capnogram. http://www.capnography.com/new/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72&Itemid=95. Accessed 10 Feb 2010.
Lohser J. Evidence-based management of one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26:241–72.
Van Limmen JGM, Szegedi LL. Peri-operative spirometry: tool or gadget? Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2008;59:273–82.
Pinsky MR, Payen D. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care. 2005;9:566–72.
Barbeito A, Mark JB. Arterial and central venous pressure monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin. 2006;24:717–35.
Courtois M, Fattal PG, Kovacs SJ Jr, et al. Anatomically and physiologically based reference level for measurement of intracardiac pressures. Circulation. 1995;92(7):1994–2000.
Magder S, Georgiadis G, Cheong T. Respiratory variations in right atrial pressure predict the response to fluid challenge. J Crit Care. 1992;7:76–85.
Marik P, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008;134:172–8.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2213–24.
Caterino U, Dialetto G, Covino FE, et al. The usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in the staging of locally advanced lung cancer. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2007;67(1):39–42.
Arthur ME, Landolfo C, Wade M, Castresana MR. Inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) measured with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be used to derive the central venous pressure (CVP) in anesthetized mechanically ventilated patients. Echocardiography. 2009;26(2):140–9.
Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000–8.
Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2002;97(4):820–6.
Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, Rhodes A, Grounds M, Bennett D. Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care. 2005;9:R687–93.
Donati A, Loggi S, Preiser J, Orsetti G, et al. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy reduces morbidity and length of hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients. Chest. 2007;132:1817–24.
Venn R, Steele A, Richardson P, et al. Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88:65–71.
Diaper J, Ellenberger C, Villiger Y, et al. Transoesophageal Doppler monitoring for fluid and hemodynamic treatment during lung surgery. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22(5):367–74.
Lobo S, Lobo F, Polachini C, Patini D, et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing fluids and dobutamine optimization of oxygen delivery in high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care. 2006;10(R72):1–11.
Lobo S, Salgado P, Castillo V, Borim A, et al. Effects of maximizing oxygen delivery on morbidity and mortality in high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(10):3396–404.
Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:419–28.
Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:134–8.
Phan TD, Ismail H, Heriot AG, et al. Improving perioperative outcomes: fluid optimization with the esophageal Doppler monitor, a metaanalysis and review. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(6):935–41.
Slinger PD, Campos JH. Anesthesia for thoracic surgery. In: Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL, editors. Miller’s anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2009.
Morgan P, Al-Subaie N, Rhodes A. Minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:322–6.
De Waal EC, Wappler F, Wolfgang F. Cardiac output monitoring. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2009;22:71–7.
Manecke GR, Auger WR. Cardiac output determination from the arterial pressure wave: clinical testing of a novel algorithm that does not require calibration. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:3–7.
Breukers RM, Sepehrkhouy S, Spiegelenberg SR, et al. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:632–5.
Mayer J, Boldt J, Wolf MW, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:867–72.
Scheeren TW, Wiesenack C, Compton FD, et al. Performance of a minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo). Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:279–80.
Mehta Y, Chand RK, Sawhney R, et al. Cardiac output monitoring: comparison of a new arterial pressure waveform analysis to the bolus thermodilution technique in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008;22:394–9.
McGee WT. A simple physiologic algorithm for managing hemodynamics using stroke volume and stroke volume variation. J Intensive Care Med. 2009;24(6):352–60.
Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P. Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Jul;293(1):H583–9.
Fuller HD. The validity of cardiac output measurement by cardiothoracic impedance: a meta-analysis. Clin Invest Med. 1992;15:103–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mena, G.E., Raghunathan, K., McGee, W.T. (2019). Intraoperative Monitoring. In: Slinger, P. (eds) Principles and Practice of Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00859-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00859-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00858-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00859-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)