Skip to main content

Conceptual Modeling of Legal Relations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11157))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Legal relations abound in conceptual modeling. Despite that, the representation of these relations in the area has not yet received sufficient theoretical support. We address this by establishing a basis for the well-founded representation of legal relations. We capture a comprehensive set of legal relations (and legal positions within these legal relations) that arise from widely accepted legal theories into a legal core ontology called UFO-L [14, 15], which is grounded on the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO). We rely on the Theory of Constitutional Rights proposed by the philosopher of law Robert Alexy. This theory extends the system of legal positions proposed by the jurist Wesley Hohfeld, which has been used as a theoretical basis for several works in the conceptual modeling literature. The result is a modeling strategy for legal relations that in- corporates patterns from the legal core ontology. We present here a synthesis of empirical studies conducted to evaluate the aforementioned results. The studies show that the approach based on UFO-L produces models that are more comprehensible and clear for the representation of legal contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Breuker, J., et al.: OWL Ontology of Basic Legal Concepts (LKIF-Core), Deliverable 1.4. Information Society Technologies (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gangemi, A., Sagri, M.-T., Tiscornia, D.: A constructive framework for legal ontologies. In: Benjamins, V.R., Casanovas, P., Breuker, J., Gangemi, A. (eds.) Law and the Semantic Web. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3369, pp. 97–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32253-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Palmirani, M., Governatori, G., Rotolo, A., Tabet, S., Boley, H., Paschke, A.: LegalRuleML: XML-based rules and norms. In: Olken, F., Palmirani, M., Sottara, D. (eds.) RuleML 2011. LNCS, vol. 7018, pp. 298–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24908-2_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ingolfo, S., Siena, A., Mylopoulos, J.: Goals and compliance in nomos 3. In: CAiSE 2014 Proceedings, pp. 1–6 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffo, C., Paulo, J., Almeida, A., Guizzardi, G., Nardi, J.C.: From an ontology of service contracts to contract modeling in enterprise architecture. In: EDOC Proceedings (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alexy, R.: A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: What’s in a relationship: an ontological analysis. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 83–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87877-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G.: “We need to discuss the relationship”: revisiting relationships as modeling constructs. In: Zdravkovic, J., Kirikova, M., Johannesson, P. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9097, pp. 279–294. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruy, F.B., Guizzardi, G., Falbo, R.A., Reginato, C.C., Santos, V.A.: From reference ontologies to ontology patterns and back. Data Knowl. Eng. 109, 41–69 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hohfeld, W.N.: Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law J. 23, 16–59 (1913)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Model. Universal Press, Veenendaal (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Towards P_{{CS}}. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., Paulo, J., Almeida, A., Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: the unified foundational ontology (UFO) story. Appl. Ontol. 10, 259–271 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffo, C.: UFO-L: Uma Ontologia Núcleo de Aspectos Jurídicos construída sob a Perspectiva das Relações Jurídicas. Published PhD Dissertation, Departamento de Informática, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (Ufes), Vitória, ES, Brasil (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Griffo, C., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: Towards a legal core ontology based on Alexy’s theory of fundamental rights. In: MWAIL-ICAIL 2015, San Diego, CA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Griffo, C., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: A pattern for the representation of legal relations in a legal core ontology (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Amazon: AWS Service Terms. https://aws.amazon.com/service-terms/

  18. Amazon: AWS Customer Agreement. https://aws.amazon.com/agreement/

  19. Griffo, C., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: A systematic mapping of the literature on legal core ontologies. In: Brazilian Conference on Ontologies, Ontobras 2015., São Paulo (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Governatori, G., Milosevic, Z.: A formal analysis of a business contract language. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 6, 1–26 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prisacariu, C., Schneider, G.: A formal language for electronic contracts. In: Bonsangue, M.M., Johnsen, E.B. (eds.) FMOODS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4468, pp. 174–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72952-5_11

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Prisacariu, C., Schneider, G.: A dynamic deontic logic for complex contracts. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 81, 458–490 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Farmer, W.M., Hu, Q.: FCL : A formal language for writing contracts. In: IEEE 17th International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration (IRI), pp. 134–141 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kabilan, V.: Contract workflow model patterns using BPMN. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp. 171–182 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kabilan, V., Johannesson, P.: Semantic representation of contract knowledge using multi tier ontology. In: 1st International Conference on Semantic Web and Databases, pp. 395–414 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bagby, J., Mullen, T.: Legal ontology of sales law application to eCommerce. Artif. Intell. Law 15, 155–170 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rodriguez-Doncel, V., Delgado, J., Llorente, S., Rodriguez, E., Boch, L.: Overview of the MPEG-21 media contract ontology. Semant. Web. 7, 311–332 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Grosof, B.N., Poon, T.C.: SweetDeal: representing agent contracts with exceptions using XML rules, ontologies, and process descriptions. In: WWW 2003 Proceedings, pp. 340–349 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pace, G.J., Schapachnik, F., Schneider, G.: Conditional permissions in contracts. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 279, 61–70 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Governatori, G., Rotolo, A.: Modelling contracts using RuleML. In: T.G. (ed.) Jurix 2004: The 17th Annual Conference, pp. 141–150. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Palmirani, M., Governatori, G., Athan, T., Boley, H., Paschke, A., Wyner, A.: LegalRuleML core specification version 1.0. http://docs.oasis-open.org

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by CNPq (407235/2017-5, 312123/2017-5, and 312158/2015-7), CAPES (23038.028816/2016-41), FAPES (69382549) and FUB (OCEAN Project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristine Griffo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Griffo, C., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G. (2018). Conceptual Modeling of Legal Relations. In: Trujillo, J., et al. Conceptual Modeling. ER 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11157. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00846-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00847-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics